期刊文献+

指代消解的主要方法及其机制 被引量:4

Main Methods and Mechanisms of Anaphora Resolution
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 指代消解是人工智能研究领域的重点和难点内容之一,因而产生了各种各样的指代消解的方法。从逻辑学的角度介绍了十四种指代消解的方法,通过研究和对比发现,指代消解的机制包括:中介机制、动态约束机制、加标机制、复合机制、范畴机制。围绕这五种机制重点研究话语表现理论、动态谓词逻辑、动态蒙太格语法、增量动态逻辑、范畴类型逻辑。 How anaphoric relations in natural languages should be formulated and investigated is one of important and difficult issues in artificial intelligence. Various systems which deal with them have been come up with. This paper presents fourteen systems in logic which be investigated by the writer. The mechanisms of anaphora resolution are as follows: intermediary mechanism; dynamic binding mechanism; indexing mecha- nism; compound mechanism; categorical mechanism. The paper is mainly concerned with Discourse Represen- tation Theory, Dynamic Predicate Logic, Dynamic Montague Grammar, Incremenral Dynamic Logic and Cate- gorical Type Logic. The five mechanisms are illustrated by the five systems respectively.
作者 张晓君
机构地区 厦门大学哲学系
出处 《毕节学院学报(综合版)》 2012年第10期36-42,共7页 Journal of Bijie University
基金 国家社科基金重大招标项目"自然语言信息处理的逻辑语义学研究"阶段性成果之一 项目编号:10&ZD 073
关键词 话语表现理论 动态谓词逻辑 动态蒙太格语法 增量动态逻辑 范畴类型逻辑 Discourse Representation Theory Dynamic Predicate Logic Dynamic Montague Gram- mar Incremental Dynamic Logic Categorical Type Logic
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1周国栋,孔芳,朱巧明.指代消解:国内外研究现状及趋势[C] //内容计算的研究与应用前沿--第九届全国计算语言学学术会议论文集.北京:清华大学出版社,2007:264-269.
  • 2候敏,孙建军.基于汉英机器翻译的名词回指分析[C]//孙茂松,陈群秀.语言计算与基于内容的文本处理.北京:清华大学出版社,2003:418-424.
  • 3王晓斌,周昌乐.基于语篇表述理论的汉语人称代词的消解研究[J].厦门大学学报(自然科学版),2004,43(1):31-35. 被引量:4
  • 4H. Kamp. A theory of truth and semantic representation[C]. In J.A.G. Groenendijk et al. (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Amsterdam, 1981:277-322.
  • 5I. Heim. File Change Semantics and the Familiarity Theory of Definiteness[C]. In R. Baaut et al. (eds.), Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language. Berlin, 1983: 164-189.
  • 6J. Groenendijk & M. Stokholf. Dynamic Predicate Logic[J]. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1991, (14): 39-100.
  • 7J. van Eijck. Incremental Dynamics[J]. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 2001, (10): 319-351.
  • 8R. Muskens. Combining Montague Semantics and Discourse Representation[J]. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1996,(19): 143-186.
  • 9邹崇理.逻辑、语言和信息[M].北京:人民出版社,2002.335.
  • 10L. Latecki and M. Pinkal. Syntactic and Semantic Conditions for Quantifier Scope[M]. Graduirung und Komparation, Arbeitspapier Nr. 13, Universitat des Saarlandes, 1990.

二级参考文献35

  • 1邹崇理.从语言到逻辑——范畴类型逻辑序列[J].重庆工学院学报,2006,20(4):1-7. 被引量:6
  • 2邹崇理.《语言,逻辑和信息--逻辑语法研究》,人民出版社,2002,第293-355页.
  • 3[1]Grosz B J,Sinder C. Attentions intentions,and the structure of discourse[J]. Computational Linguistics,1986,12(3):175-204.
  • 4[2]Huls C, Classen W,Bos E. Automatic reference resolution of deitic and anaphora expressions[J]. Computational Linguistics,1995,21(1):51-80.
  • 5[3]Ruslan Mitkov, Richard Evans, Constantin Orasn. A New,Fully Automatic Version of Mitkov′s Knowledge-Poor Pronoun Resolution Method. A.Gelbukh. CICLing 2002[M].Berlin, Heidelberg:Springer-Verlag,2002.168-186.
  • 6[4]Grosz B J, Joshi A K,Weinstein Scott. Centering: a framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse[J]. Computational Lingustics,1995,21(2):203-225.
  • 7[5]Botley Simon. Corpus_based and Computational Approaches to Discourse Anaphora[J]. Amsterdam,Philadelphia:J.Benjamins Pub.,2000.
  • 8谌志群,周昌乐,郑洪.汉语语篇中人称指代消歧研究[J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),1998,(增刊):121-124.
  • 9[9]Kamp H, Reyle U. From Discourse to Logic[M]. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers,1993.
  • 10[10]邹崇理. 自然语言逻辑研究[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1996.

共引文献23

同被引文献23

  • 1冯志伟.自然语言处理中的歧义消解方法[J].语言文字应用,1996(1):55-60. 被引量:25
  • 2周国栋,孔芳,朱巧明.指代消解:国内外研究现状及趋势[C] //内容计算的研究与应用前沿--第九届全国计算语言学学术会议论文集.北京:清华大学出版社,2007:264-269.
  • 3KAMP H, REYLE U. From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Model-theoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory [M]. Dordrcht: K|uwer, 1993.
  • 4GROENENDIJK J, STOKHOF M. Dynamic Predicate Logic[J]. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1991,14(3).
  • 5KOLLER A, NIEHREN J. On Underspeeified Processing of Dynamic Semantics[C]//Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Computational Linguistics, 2000,1-7.
  • 6VISSER A. Contexts in Dynamic Predicate Logic [J]. Journal of Logic Language and Information, 1998,7(1).
  • 7VAN EIJCK J, STOKHOF M. The Gamut of Dynamic Logics[C]//WOODS J GABBAY D M., (eds.) Handbook of the History of Logic, Vol. 7: Logic and the Modalities in the Twentieth Century. Nether lands.. North Holland, 2006.
  • 8邹崇理.语言、逻辑和信息一逻辑语法研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2002.
  • 9张晓君,郝一江.动态谓词逻辑的动态机制[J].哲学动态,2010(9):83-89. 被引量:5
  • 10高山.自然语言中同一性语句的逻辑分析[J].毕节学院学报(综合版),2010,28(12):41-44. 被引量:1

引证文献4

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部