期刊文献+

中国农业巨灾风险评估方法研究 被引量:30

Assessment Approach for Agricultural Catastrophic Risk in China
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 【目的】研究中国农业巨灾风险评估的方法。【方法】利用农作物受灾面积、成灾面积和绝收面积获得中国农业灾害损失数据,同时运用蒙特卡罗模拟技术以解决样本数据不足的难题;运用极值POT模型实现对农业灾害损失尾部分布的有效拟合,建立农业巨灾损失的广义Pareto分布模型;建立基于VaR方法的农业巨灾风险的精确度量模型;选择河南省粮食生产的旱灾巨灾风险作为中国农业巨灾风险评估的案例。【结果】构建了中国农业巨灾风险评估的基本框架;旱灾巨灾对河南省粮食生产的影响总体上相对有限,其损失的平均值在10%左右,但在面临50年一遇甚至是百年一遇的旱灾巨灾时,粮食损失率将分别高达22.60%和25.24%,须引起决策层的高度重视。【结论】本研究所提出的中国农业巨灾风险评估方法是切实可行的。 【Objective】 The purpose of this paper is to provide an evaluation method for agricultural catastrophic risk.【Method】 Data on agricultural disaster loss were collected based on hectares covered by natural disasters,hectares affected by natural disasters,and hectares destroyed by natural disasters using the standard process,and Monte Carlo simulation was used to expand sample size.Peak over threshold(POT) approach based on the extreme value theory was used to model the distribution of agricultural catastrophic loss,and value at risk(VaR) was used to assess agricultural catastrophic risk.The paper cited drought catastrophe in Henan province of China as an example and assessed grain-production risk using the method proposed.【Result】The basic framework for assessment of agricultural catastrophic risk in China has been constructed.Drought catastrophe slightly affects grain-production in Henan province of China generally,and the mean loss of drought catastrophic is about 10%;however,the drought catastrophic risk is severe in the scenario of 50 years or 100 years for a return,and the grain loss caused by drought catastrophe will exceed 20%.More attention for policy designer must be taken into account.【Conclusion】The evaluation method of agricultural catastrophic risk is found to be appropriate and feasible.
作者 徐磊 张峭
出处 《中国农业科学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第9期1945-1952,共8页 Scientia Agricultura Sinica
基金 "十一五"国家科技支撑计划重点项目(2009BADA9B01) 中国农业科学院农业信息研究所公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金(2011-J-09)
关键词 农业巨灾 农业灾情数据 蒙特卡罗模拟 POT模型 VAR 风险评估 agricultural catastrophe agricultural loss data Monte Carlo simulation POT VaR risk assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1徐磊,张峭.构建粮食生产风险管理体系,完善粮食安全保障长效机制[J].中国食物与营养,2010,16(11):4-6. 被引量:8
  • 2Goodwin B K, Mahul O. Risk Modeling Concepts Relating to the Design and Rating of Agricultural Insurance Contracts. Washington DC, 2004.
  • 3Sherrick B J, Zanini F C, Schnitkey G D, Irwin S H. Crop insurance valuation under alternative yield distributions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2004, 86(2): 406-419.
  • 4Turvey C, Zhao J H. Parametric and Non-parametric Crop Yield Distributions and their Effects on All-risk Crop Insurance Premiums, University of Guelph, Toronto, 2008.
  • 5Ramirez O A, Misra S, Field J. Crop-yield distributions revisited. American Journal of .4 gricultural Economic, 2003, 85(1 ): 108-120.
  • 6Coble K H, Knight T O, Pope R D, Williams J R. Modeling farm-level crop insurance demand with panel data. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1996, 78(2): 439-447.
  • 7Goodwin B.K, Ker A E Nonparametric estimation of crop yield distributions: implications for rating group-risk crop insurance contracts. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1998, 80(1): 139-153.
  • 8Hao J Q. Modeling and financing weather risk: three essays[D]. Lexington: University of Kentucky, 2005.
  • 9解强.极值理论在巨灾损失拟合中的应用[J].金融发展研究,2008(7):68-71. 被引量:7
  • 10欧阳资生.巨灾保险索赔数据的极值风险度量[J].统计与决策,2007,23(22):26-28. 被引量:8

二级参考文献43

共引文献61

同被引文献511

引证文献30

二级引证文献173

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部