期刊文献+

农业生产风险评估方法评述及展望 被引量:22

Agricultural Yield Risk Assessment:Review and Outlook
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 严谨科学的农业生产风险评估是准确厘定农业保险费率的基础和前提,对于降低农业保险中的逆选择和道德风险问题具有十分重要的作用。通过对国内外已有研究成果进行系统梳理,认为基于风险损失的农业生产风险评估方法最适合中国农业保险发展的实际情况,虽然该方法范式已基本成熟,但在风险损失估计和风险分布拟合两个方面都需要进一步完善,如何完善农业生产风险评估方法、如何从空间维度和时空维度评估农业生产风险可能成为未来研究的方向。 The robust assessment on agricultural yield risk has been considered as the vital step to price actuarial agricultural insurance which is important for eliminating the influence of adverse selection and moral hazard. Reviewing on the approaches of agricultural risk assessment comprehensively, we argued that the assessment approaches based on risk loss were the most appropriate ones for China. Although the approaches were well developed in previous studies, there were limitations/weakness in the process of loss estimation and the simulation of risk distribution. Finally three issues on improving risk assessment approach, and temporal & spatial assessment for agricultural yield risk were proposed in this paper for the consideration of future study.
作者 王克 张峭
出处 《农业展望》 2013年第2期38-43,共6页 Agricultural Outlook
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(41171410)
关键词 农业风险 生产风险评估 方法评述 研究展望 agricultural risk yield risk assessment review outlook
  • 相关文献

参考文献54

  • 1庹国柱.中国农业保险发展报告2012[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2012.
  • 2张峭,徐磊,王克.加强农业生产风险评估与区划,保障农业保险持续健康发展[EB/OL].(2011-05-09)[2013-01-08].http://finance.people.com.cn/nc/GB/14547094.html.
  • 3叶涛,聂建亮,武宾霞,李曼,史培军.基于产量统计模型的农作物保险定价研究进展[J].中国农业科学,2012,45(12):2544-2551. 被引量:24
  • 4张峭,王克.农作物生产风险分析的方法和模型[J].农业展望,2007,3(8):7-10. 被引量:42
  • 5Goodwin ,B. K. and Mahul O. Risk Modeling Concepts Re- lating to the Design and Rating of Agricultural Insurance Contracts[ R]. Working Paper,World Bank,2004.
  • 6张峭,等.中国农业生产风险评估与区划:理论与实践[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2013.
  • 7赵思健.情景驱动的淮河流域水稻洪涝灾害风险评估[C].中国灾害防御协会风险分析专业委员会第四届年会论文集,2010:392-399.
  • 8Coble,K. H. , B.J. Barnett. An assessment of risk exposure in agricultural: a literature review [J ]. Working paper of OECD,2008.
  • 9Harri, A, C. Erdem, K. H. Coble, T. O. Knight. Crop Yield Distributions : a reconciliation of Previous Research and Statis- tical Tests for Normality[J]. Review of Agricultural Eco- nomics 2009,31 ( 1 ) :163 -182.
  • 10Coble,K. H. , et al. A Comprehensive Review of the RMA APH and COMBO Rating Methodology [ R ] . Final Re- port,2010.

二级参考文献153

共引文献489

同被引文献269

引证文献22

二级引证文献175

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部