期刊文献+

头状骨短缩术治疗月骨无菌性坏死的生物力学研究 被引量:4

Biomechanical analysis of capitate shortening for treatment of Kienbock's disease
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 为头状骨短缩术治疗月骨无菌性坏死提供生物力学依据。方法 对 10侧新鲜上肢标本 ,应用背侧粘贴电阻应变片的方法 ,通过电子万能实验机加载 ,在头状骨短缩前后 ,分别测量头状骨、舟骨、月骨和三角骨的应力变化。结果 完整的腕关节在承受轴向压缩负荷时 ,月骨及舟骨背侧的贴片点表现为拉伸应变 ,而头状骨及三角骨则表现为压缩应变。头状骨短缩术后 ,月骨表现为压缩应变 ,而头状骨的压缩应变则明显减小 ,舟骨拉伸应变明显增加 ,三角骨压缩应变无明显变化。结论 头状骨短缩术可通过桡腕关节使应力重新分布 ,使月骨承受由头状骨传递来的轴向负荷明显减小 ,有利于月骨的血运重建。 Objective To provide biomechanical basis for capitate shortening in treatment of Kienbock's disease. Methods The study was carried out on 10 fresh cadaveric upper limbs.Using dorsally mounted gauge, the stress changes of capitate, lunate, scaphoid and triangular bone under load were measured pre and post operatively by electric testing apparatus. Results When intact wrist was loaded,tensile strain was detected in lunate and scaphoid. On the contrary, capitate and triangular bone sustained compressive strain. After capitate was shortened, lunate bone compressive strain.The compressive stress of capitate and the tensile stress of scaphoid increased significantly, whereas stress on the triangular bone didn't change much. Conclusions Capitate shortening redistributes stress of the wrist and decreases the longitudinal compressive load on the lunate,which in turn facilitates revascularization of the lunate.
出处 《中华手外科杂志》 CSCD 1999年第3期146-148,共3页 Chinese Journal of Hand Surgery
基金 吉林省科研基金!资助项目 (编号 970 569)
关键词 月骨 骨坏死 腕骨 应力物理 治疗 Semilunar bone Osteonecrosis Carpal bones Stress, Mechanical
  • 相关文献

同被引文献54

  • 1王云亭,洪光祥,朱通伯,王发斌,黄省秋,万圣祥,张建新.近排腕骨切除治疗经舟月骨周围脱位的疗效[J].中华手外科杂志,1996,12(3):159-161. 被引量:21
  • 2裴福兴,杨志明,黄富国,张世琼.带蒂豌豆骨移位替代月骨治疗月骨缺血性坏死[J].中华骨科杂志,1996,16(1):28-30. 被引量:18
  • 3Douglas M, Michael J, Richard H. Vascularity of the carpus[J]. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2001,383:47-59.
  • 4Bonzar M, Firrell J C, Hainer M, et al. Kienbock's disease and negative ulnar variance[J]. J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 1998, 80A 1154-1157.
  • 5Chung K C, Spilson S V, Kim H M. Is negative ulnar variance a risk factor for Kienbock's disease? A meta-analysis[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2001,47:494-499.
  • 6D'Hoore K, De Smet L, Verellen K, et al. Negative ulnar variance is not a risk factor for Kienbock's disease[J]. J Hand Surg (Am), 1994, 19A:229-231.
  • 7Jafarnia K, Collins E, Kohl III H, et al. Reliability of the Lichtman classification of Kienbock's disease[J]. J Hand Surg, 2000, 25A: 529-534..
  • 8Goldfarb C, Hsu J, Gelberman R, et al. The Lichtman classification for Kienbock's disease: an assessment of reliability [J]. J Hand Surg, 2003,28A:74-80.
  • 9Gregory I, Malcolm Begg. Arthroscopic assessment and classification of Kienbock's disease[J]. Technjques in Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery, 2006, 1 (1):8-13.
  • 10Kozuki K, Tanaka H, Chicrei Y. Use of skeletal for early Kien- bock's disease[J]. Techniques in Hand and Upper Extremmity Surgery, 1999, 3(3):163-168.

引证文献4

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部