期刊文献+

月骨假体形态的研究及其临床应用 被引量:4

Study of the lunate shape and its clinical application
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 了解国人的月骨形态 ,为月骨假体的制作提供依据。方法 采用标准 X线摄片技术 ,对 10 0例 (左右各 5 0例 )拍摄腕关节侧位片 ,并测量 X线片上月骨的宽、高、凹面跨度及凹面曲线。结果 国人的月骨可分为 3种类型 ,其凹面曲线方程分别是 y=- 0 .0 5 8x2 +0 .95 6 9x+0 .10 89,y=- 0 .0 76 5 x2 +1.15 99x +0 .0 6 0 2 ,y =- 0 .0 919x2 +1.2 813x +0 .0 938。按此结果用硅橡胶制作出 3种大小的月骨假体 ,用于治疗 11例月骨无菌性坏死 ,术后平均随访 5 2个月 ,优良率达 10 0 % ,疗效满意。结论 利用月骨的宽、高、凹面跨度及凹面曲线来表示月骨的形态 。 Objective To observe the morphology of the lunate bone in Chinese population and provide parameters for production of lunate prosthesis. Methods Lateral projection X ray films of the wrist were taken in 100 individuals (50 of the left wrist and 50 of the right). The height, width, concave distance were measured and the concave formula was calculated. Results The shape of the lunate bone in Chinese population can be divided into three types, the concave formula of which are y = -0 058x 2 + 0 9569x + 0 1089, y = -0 0765x 2 + 1 1599x + 0 0602, y = -0 0919x 2 + 1 2813x + 0 0938 According to the results, three types of lunate prosthesis were designed and produced 11 cases of Kienbock's disease were treated by implantation of the silicone rubber prosthesis 100 % satisfactory rate was observed after an average of 52 months' follow up Conclusions The shape of the lunate bone is characterized by its width,height,concave distance and concave formula. Modeling of the lunate prosthesis should be in accordance with these parameters.
出处 《中华手外科杂志》 CSCD 1999年第3期138-140,共3页 Chinese Journal of Hand Surgery
基金 浙江省卫生厅科研基金!资助项目 (编号 940 1 4 )
关键词 月骨 骨坏死 生物假体 假体设计 临床应用 Semilunar bone Osteonecrosis Bioprosthesis Prosthesis design
  • 相关文献

同被引文献32

  • 1裴福兴,杨志明,黄富国,沈怀信.腕骨间融合联合带蒂豌豆骨移位治疗月骨缺血性坏死[J].中华手外科杂志,1995,11(3):131-134. 被引量:17
  • 2裴福兴,杨志明,黄富国,张世琼.带蒂豌豆骨移位替代月骨治疗月骨缺血性坏死[J].中华骨科杂志,1996,16(1):28-30. 被引量:18
  • 3路来金 王首夫 尹维田 等.晚期月骨无菌性坏死一种新的治疗方法[J].白求恩医科大学学报,1998,14:447-447.
  • 4Douglas M, Michael J, Richard H. Vascularity of the carpus[J]. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2001,383:47-59.
  • 5Bonzar M, Firrell J C, Hainer M, et al. Kienbock's disease and negative ulnar variance[J]. J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 1998, 80A 1154-1157.
  • 6Chung K C, Spilson S V, Kim H M. Is negative ulnar variance a risk factor for Kienbock's disease? A meta-analysis[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2001,47:494-499.
  • 7D'Hoore K, De Smet L, Verellen K, et al. Negative ulnar variance is not a risk factor for Kienbock's disease[J]. J Hand Surg (Am), 1994, 19A:229-231.
  • 8Jafarnia K, Collins E, Kohl III H, et al. Reliability of the Lichtman classification of Kienbock's disease[J]. J Hand Surg, 2000, 25A: 529-534..
  • 9Goldfarb C, Hsu J, Gelberman R, et al. The Lichtman classification for Kienbock's disease: an assessment of reliability [J]. J Hand Surg, 2003,28A:74-80.
  • 10Gregory I, Malcolm Begg. Arthroscopic assessment and classification of Kienbock's disease[J]. Technjques in Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery, 2006, 1 (1):8-13.

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部