摘要
目的比较中药、西药、中西医结合三种方法治疗亚临床甲状腺功能减退症(亚临床甲减)的作用,进而评价温肾方加减对亚临床甲减的临床疗效。方法将75例患者随机分为中药组、西药组、中西医结合组,每组各25例。中药组给予温肾方加减口服;西药组给予西药优甲乐常规治疗;中西医结合组采用温肾方加减配合优甲乐常规治疗。1个月为1个疗程,3个疗程后进行疗效评定。结果中西医结合组总有效率及甲状腺激素水平优于其他两组(P<0.05)。结论中西医结合治疗亚临床甲减,疗效优于单纯中药或西药治疗。
Objective To compare the effects of Chinese medicine,western medicine and integrative traditional Chinese and western medicine in treating subclinical hypothyroidism,and evaluate the therapeutic effect of Wenshenfang.Methods 75 patients were randomly divided into Chinese medicine group treated by Wenshenfang,western medicine group treated by L-T4,and integrative medicine group treated by both Wenshenfang and L-T4,with 25 cases in each group.The duration of a course of treatment was one month,and the therapeutic effect was assessed after three courses of treatment.Results The total effective rate and the level of thyroid hormone in the integrative medicine group were significantly higher than the other groups（P0.05）.Conclusion Integrative traditional Chinese and western medicine has better therapeutic effect than either Chinese medicine or western medicine alone in treating subclinical hypothyroidism.
出处
《中西医结合研究》
2011年第2期62-64,共3页
Research of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine
关键词
亚临床甲减
温肾方
中西医结合
subclinical hypothyroidism
Wenshenfang
integrative traditional Chinese and western medicine
