期刊文献+

论国际刑事法院证据规则的混合模式——以大陆法系和英美法系证据规则比较为视角 被引量:1

Study on the Hybrid Evidence Rule in the International Court of Crminal Justice:from the Perspective of Comparative Study of evidence Rule in Civil law and Common Law Jurisdiction.
原文传递
导出
摘要 国际刑事法院诉讼规则是一种混合模式,证据规则也不例外。而这种混合模式融合了大陆法系证据采纳的宽泛规定和普通法系证据收集、出示和审查中的对抗制因素。这种混合模式有其特定的成因,而大陆法系和普通法系对这一混合模式则存在不同的看法,本文从比较视角对这一问题进行了分析,并指出了其对我国证据立法的启示。 International Court of Criminal Jusitce takes a hybrid approach in evidence rule-making. On the one side, it adopts no technical rules on evidence admission which is similar to civil law practice; on the other hand, it adopts common law approach with a trend towards civil law practice in evidence collecting, presenting and examination. There are different voices from civil law and common law perspective. This article introduces the current situation, gives the analysis on the above issues and points out the hinds on the evidence rule-making in China.
作者 董京波
出处 《证据科学》 2011年第1期85-91,共7页 Evidence Science
基金 中国政法大学"全球化与全球问题"创新团队资助
关键词 国际刑事法院 证据规则 混合模式 International Court of Criminal Justice, Evidence rule, Hybrid approach
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1肖铃.国际刑事诉讼中证据自由原则的确立和发展——兼论国际刑事法院的模式选择[J].中国刑事法杂志,2010(6):114-120. 被引量:2
  • 2程味秋.两大法系刑事诉讼模式之比较[J].比较法研究,1997,11(2):74-80. 被引量:18
  • 3Gary Wilson.William A. Schabas: The UN International Criminal Tribunals: The Former Yugoslavia, Rwanda and Sierra Leone[J]. Liverpool Law Review . 2008 (3)
  • 4Delalie.DecLLonon Motion of the Prosec on for Admissibility of Evidence. . 1998
  • 5"Instructions for the Organization and Activity of the Organs of the Serbian People in Bosnia and Herzegovina inExtraordinary Circumstances.". .
  • 6Evidence,Proof and Facts:A Book of Souiaces. . 2003
  • 7Brdanin.Order on the Standards Governing the Admission of Evidence. . 2002
  • 8Richard May,Marieke Wierda.International Criminal Evidence. . 2002
  • 9Peter Murphy."Excluding justice or facilitating justice? International criminal law would benefit from rules of evidence". EvPro . 2008
  • 10Mirjan Damaska.Evidential Barriers to Conviction and Two Models of Criminal Procedure: A Comparative Study. University of Pennsylvania Law Review . 1973

二级参考文献35

  • 1Blaskic,Judgment,Mar.3,2000.
  • 2Richard May and Marieke Wierda,International Criminal Evidence,Transnational Publishers,Inc.,2002,p.97.
  • 3Richard May and Marieke Wierda,'Trends in International Criminal Evidence:Nuremberg,Tokyo,The Hague,and Arusha',(1999)37 Columbis Journal of Transnational Law 725,at pp.729-730.
  • 4Delalic et al.,Decision on the Prosecution's Motion for the Redaction of the Public Record,June 5,1997 at para.41.
  • 5Tadic,Separate and Dissenting Opinion of Judge McDonald on Prosecution Motion for Production of Defence Witness Statements,Nov.27,1996,at para.34.
  • 6《前南刑庭规则》第89条第一款.
  • 7《卢旺达刑庭规则》第89条第一款.
  • 8Gideon Boas,"Admissibility of Evidence under the Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the ICTY:Development of the ' Flexibility Principle'",in Richard May,ed.Essays on ICTY Procedure and Evidence in Honour of Gabrielle Kirk McDonald,Kluwer Law International,2001,p.264.
  • 9《罗马规约》第69条.
  • 10《ICC规则》第63条.

共引文献18

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部