2Hailer et al., 1990, School Size and Program Comprehensive ness .. Evidence from High School and Beyond,Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 12,109-120.
3Benton, Davis.A Consolidation Success Story. American School Board Jottrnal,V179n4p42-43Apr 1992.
4Melnick, Steven A. ; And Others.A Comparativc Study of the Relationships between School District Size and Selected Indicators of Educational Quality. [EB/OL]http ://www.etic.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/21/8a/2c ,pdf.1986-02-12.
5Walberg,Herbert J.;Fowler,WiUiam J., Jr.Expenditure and Size Efflciencies of Public School Districts.[EB/OL]http://www.eric.ed.gov/ EklCWebPottal/Home.portal? nfpb=true & EklCExtSearch Operator_2,1986.
6Michael J. Hicks;Viktoriya Rusalkina School Consolidation and educational performance. [EB/OL]http ://www.marshalLedu/cber/ research/School Consolidation.pdf.May 2004.
8JEerry Johnson: More doesn't Mean Better: Larger High, Schools and More Courses do not Boost Student Achievement in Iowa High Schools [EB/OL].http..//www.ruraledu.org.2006.3/2007-9- 20.
9Robert Bickel;Craig Howley;Tony Williams;Catherine Glascock.High School Size,Achievement Equity,and Cost:Bobust Interaction Effects and Tentativc Results.Education Policy Analysis Archives, v9 n40 October 8,2001.
10Coe,Pam. Thc Condition of Rural Education in Kentucky:A Profile. [EB/OL]http ://www.eric.ed.gov/EP, ICDocs/data/ericdocs2s ql/ content_storage 01/000019b/80/20/61/f8 .pdf. 1989.
