摘要
鉴于并存债务承担制度在立法及理论研究上的缺憾,文章对该制度进行系统研究。正确理解并存债务承担制度,必须考虑到我国特定的学术与立法背景。文章分析了并存债务承担制度的内涵与外延,并通过对《合同法》第84条的解释论分析,认为并存债务承担并不包含在"部分移转"之中,我国立法并未承认并存债务承担制度,存在立法漏洞。文章突出债务承担合同的中心地位,并以此为基础讨论并存债务承担中履行障碍的解决机制。
Considering the defect of legislation and research on the institution of cofigurative debt delegation,the thesis makes a systematical research.It is necessary to recognize the special academic and legislative backgroud in China to understand the position of the institution of cofigurative debt delegation in our legal system.The intension and extension of the institution are studied in the paper.Through analysis of article 84 of Contract Law of PRC and summary of academic viewpoints,the paper holds that cofigurative debt delegation is not contained in partial debt delegation and It is not accepted by Chinese legislation either.There is legislative loophole needed to be repaired.The paper takes the contract aiming at debt delegation as the core to study the settlement mechanism of obstacle in implementation of cofigurative debt delegation.
出处
《北京科技大学学报（社会科学版）》
2011年第1期61-68,共8页
Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
并存债务承担
债务承担合同
部分债务承担
cofigurative debt delegation
the contract aiming at debt delegation
partial debt delegation
