期刊文献+

两种PRB反应介质去除地下水中硝酸盐效果对比 被引量:5

The Contrast about Removal Effects on Nitrate in Groundwater for Two Reaction Medium of PRB
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]研究可渗透反应屏(PRB)技术不同介质对地下水中硝酸盐的去除效果。[方法]模拟地下水环境,以硝酸盐污染的地下水为研究对象,设计2个PRB反应器,分别采用负载生物介质、零价铁-活性炭两组反应材料作为PRB装置的反应介质,考察其对污染的地下水中硝酸盐的去除效果。[结果]当水温为13~15℃、PH值7.2~7.5时,负载生物介质硝酸氮去除率可持续达到90%左右,COD的去除率也稳定保持在80%左右;零价铁-活性炭反应介质硝酸氮去除率稳定停留在50%左右,COD得去除率保持在15%~30%之间。[结论]负载生物介质的去除效果更稳定,相对较好,以负载生物介质作为反应材料的PRB用于原位浅层地下水中硝酸盐污染的治理具有潜在的应用价值。 [Objective]The aim was to research the removal effects on nitrate in groundwater for different reaction medium of PRB.[Method]According to the simulated groundwater and with the nitrate contamination of groundwater as material,the removal effects on nitrate in groundwater for immobilized microorganisms and zero-valent iron and activated carbon reaction mediums of PRB were reviewed.[Result]The results showed that when the water temperature is 13-15 ℃ and pH 7.2-7.5,nitrate removal rate of immobilized microorganisms could sustainably achieve 90%,COD removal rate was also maitained at 80%;nitrate removal rate of zero-valent iron and activated carbon reaction medium maitained 50%,COD removal rate was 15%-30%.[Conclusion]The removal rate of Immobilized microorganisms was higher and better.so the PRB with immobilized microorganisms as reaction media had potential applications for the treatment of nitrate polluted groundwater.
出处 《安徽农业科学》 CAS 北大核心 2011年第9期5172-5174,共3页 Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences
基金 辽宁省省级重点实验室(高校)开放基金资助课题(SZ-200908) 辽宁省自然科学基金(20072012) 建设部重点科技项目(2007-K4-24)
关键词 可渗透反应墙 硝酸盐 反应介质 去除效果 PRB Nitrate Reactive media Removal effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1杨维,王恩德,陈曦.基于AQUA3D的地下水流模拟实例[J].工程勘察,2004,32(3):32-34. 被引量:3
  • 2RODRIGUEZ-MAROTO J M,GARCIA-HERRUZO F,GARCIA-RUBIO A,et al.Kinetics of the chemical reduction of nitrate by zero-valent iron[J].Chemosphere,2009,74(6):804-809.
  • 3CHEN J Y,TANG C Y,SHEN Y J,et al.Nitrate pollution of groundwater in a wastewater irrigated field of Hebei Province,Chian[J].Wastewater Re-Use and Groundwater Quality,2004,285(7):23-27.
  • 4THIRUVENKATACHARI R,VIGNESWARAN S,NAIDU R.Permneable reactive barrier for groundwater remediation[J].Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry,2008,14(2):145-56.
  • 5OLIVER S,MARKUS E,MARGIT F,et al.Degradating of TCE with iron:the role of competing chromate and nitrate reduction[J].Ground Water,2000,38(3):403-409.
  • 6GANDHI S,OH B T,SCHNOOR J L,et al.Degradation of TCE,Cr(Ⅵ),sulfate,and nitratemixtures by granular iron in flow-through columns under different microbial conditions[J].Water Res,2002,36(8):1973-1982.
  • 7KENNEKE J F,MCCUTCHEON S C.Use of pretreatment zones and zerovalent iron for the remediation of chloroalkenes in an oxie aquifer[J].Environ Sci Technol,2003,37(12):2829-2835.
  • 8GILLHAM R W,O'HANNESIN S F.Enhanced Degradationo Halogenated Aliphatics by Zero-Valent Iron[J].Gronnd Water,1994,32(6):958-967.
  • 9MORRISON S J,METZLER D R,DWYER B P.Removal of As,Mn,Mo,Se,U,V and Zn form Groundwater by Zero-valent Iron in a Passive Treatment Cell:Reaction Progress Modeling[J].Journal of Contaminant Hydrology,2002,56(1/2):99-116.
  • 10LOOKMAN R,BASTIAENS L,BORRE MANS B,et al.Batch-test Study on the Dechlorination of 1,1,1-Trich Loroethanein Contaminated Aquifer Material by Zero-valence[J].Journal of Contaminant Hydrology,2004,74(1/4):133-144.

二级参考文献92

共引文献156

同被引文献88

引证文献5

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部