期刊文献+

战略性新兴产业培育的知识产权与标准竞争战略研究 被引量:10

A Study on Intellectual Property Right and Technical Standard Competition Strategy during Nurturing of Strategic Emerging Industries
原文传递
导出
摘要 知识产权和技术标准是战略性新兴产业国际竞争的制高点,基于专利池构建的知识产权和标准竞争战略对战略性新兴产业的发展至关重要。社会分工的深化和专利网战略的盛行直接导致专利丛林和"反公地悲剧"的出现。后发国家进行全球标准竞争需要立足发展中大国的用户安装基础和本土市场优势,依托标准组建"前端控制"型专利池,大力提升企业的技术能力和自主创新能力,积极布局核心技术和外围技术,逐步提升专利池构建和标准制定中的话语权,并要建立健全防范对专利池、技术标准权利垄断和滥用的法律机制。 Being the commanding point of the global industrial competition, intellectual property rights and technical standards based on patent pool is vital to the development of strategic emerging industries. The intensifying of social labor division and the prevalence of patent network strategy directly leads to the emergence of patent thicket and the tragedy of the anti - commons. Late comers who are engaged in standard competition should take advantage of its users installed base and local market privilege, and construct front -controlled patent pool with the support of standards, greatly enhancing corporate technical capability and self innovation capability. While core technology and peripheral technology being planned out, and discourse power during patent pool construction and standard stipulation to be gradually improved, legal system should be established and perfected to protect patent pool and technical standard rights against being monopolized and abused.
作者 朱瑞博
出处 《上海经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第4期79-88,共10页 Shanghai Journal of Economics
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"基于模块化理论的自主创新机制与标准化战略研究"(批准号:06CJL011) 上海市科学技术委员会科技发展基金软科学研究重点项目"战略性新兴产业的发展规律及政府作用机制研究"(编号11692101200) 中国浦东干部学院长江三角洲研究院资助项目(编号celap2010-YBA-04)
关键词 专利池 专利丛林 知识产权 标准竞争 专利标准化 patent pool patent thicket Intellectual Property Right standard competition patent standardization
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1Abramovitz Moses. 1956, Resource and Output Trends in the United States Since 1870, American Economic Re-view, 46 : 5 - 23.
  • 2Cornelli, Francesca and Schankerman, Mark A. , Patent Renewals and R&D Incentives. RAND Journal of Eco-nomics, 1999. Vol. 30(2). 197-213.
  • 3Day, George S., Paul Schoemaker, Robert Gunther, 2000. Wharton on Managing Emerging. Technologies. JohnWiley & Sons.
  • 4Dijk V T. Patent height and competition in product improvements [ J ]. Journal of Industrial Economics, 1996,44:151 -167.
  • 5Ebersole, T. J. Patent Pools as a Solution to the Licensing Problems of Diagnostic Genetics . Intellectual Property &Technology Law Journal. 2005, 17(1 ) :6 - 13 .
  • 6Gilbert R, Shapiro C. Optimalpatent length and breadth[ J]. RAND Journal of Economics, 1990,21 ( 1 ) : 106 -112.
  • 7Heller, Michael A. 1998. The Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition from Marx to Markets.Harvard Law Review 111(3) : 621 -88.
  • 8Heller, Michael A. , Rebecca S Eisenberg. Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Re-search[ J]. Science, 1998, (1) :698 - 701 .
  • 9Klemperer, Paul. How Broad Should the Scope of Patent Protection Be? [J]. The RAND Journal of Economics.1990. Vol. 21(1). 113 -130.
  • 10Krechmer, K. Communications standards and patent rights: Conflict or coordination? [ C ]. Economics of theSoftware and Internet Industries Conference, Toulouse, France: 2005.

二级参考文献170

共引文献793

同被引文献139

引证文献10

二级引证文献76

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部