期刊文献+

急性冠脉综合征患者GRACE评分与冠脉病变的相互关系 被引量:3

GRACE score in patients with acute coronary syndrome and the relationship with coronary artery lesions
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的 探讨急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者全球急性冠状动脉事件注册(GRACE)评分与冠状动脉病变程度的关系,评价GRACE评分对冠状动脉病变预测的价值.方法 收集2008年5月至2010年10月住院的ACS患者共360例,对其进行GRACE评分.以评分差异分组,分为高危组、中危组和低危组,分析不同组别中患者冠状动脉病变的严重程度,以及与GRACE评分的关系.结果 随着GRACE评分分值的增加,ACS患者冠状动脉狭窄支数及狭窄程度呈增加的趋势.结论 GRACE评分对ACS患者冠状动脉病变支数、狭窄严重程度有一定的预测价值. Objective To investigate the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in patients with acute coronary events worldwide up (GRACE) score and coronary artery disease and to evaluate the GRACE score predictive value of coronary artery disease. Methods From May 2008 to October 2010 360 patients hospitalized for ACS patients, its GRACE score, to score were grouped into high-risk group, the risk group, low-risk group of patients in different groups the severity of coronary artery disease, and with the GRACE score. Results With the increase in score GRACE score, ACS count in patients with coronary artery stenosis and the degree of stenosis was increasing. Conclusion GRACE score on the number of ACS patients with coronary artery lesions, the severity of stenosis have some predictive value.
作者 张琮
出处 《中国心血管病研究》 CAS 2011年第3期188-190,共3页 Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Research
关键词 急性冠脉综合征 危险评分 全球急性冠脉综合征注册 冠状血管造影术 Acute coronary syndrome Risk score GRACE Coronary angiography
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献60

  • 1《中国糖尿病防治指南》(试行本)(节选)[J].中国慢性病预防与控制,2004,12(6):283-285. 被引量:308
  • 2张成立,黄晓勇,吕树铮,杨秀华,杨凤军.青年与老年冠心病危险因素和冠状动脉造影比较分析[J].心肺血管病杂志,2005,24(2):101-102. 被引量:17
  • 3徐荣,高国旺,刘长虹,王颖.不同年龄急性心肌梗死患者的临床特征与冠脉造影情况比较[J].中国心血管病研究,2006,4(7):511-513. 被引量:11
  • 4Granger C B, Goldberg R J, Dabbous O H, et al. Global registry of acute coronary events investigators. Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events [J]. Arch Intern Med, 2006, 163 (19) : 2345-2353.
  • 5Antman E M, Cohen M, Bemink P J, et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI : a method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making [J]. JAMA ,2000, 284(7) : 835-842.
  • 6Sheridan S, Pignone M, Mulrow C, et al. Framingham-based tools to calculate the global risk of coronary heart disease: a systematic review of tools for clinicians [J]. J Gen Intern Med,2003,18( 12): 1039-1052.
  • 7Clayton T C, Lubsen J, Pocock S J, et al. Risk score far predicting death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in patients with stable angina, based on a large randomised trial cohort of patients [J]. BMJ, 2005, 331(7521 ) : 869-876.
  • 8Keeley E C, Boura J A, Grines C L. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytie therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials [J]. Lancet,2003,361 (9351) : 13-20.
  • 9Conway Morris A, Caesar D, Gray S, et al. TIMI risk score accurately risk stratifies patients with undifferentiated chest pain presenting to an emergency department [J]. Heart, 2006,92(9): 1333-1334.
  • 10Terkelsen C J, Vach W. Can risk score models help in reducing serious outcome events [ J ]. BMJ, 2005,331 (7521) : 869.

共引文献112

同被引文献19

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部