期刊文献+

清洁生产和末端治理环境绩效对比分析 被引量:20

Environmental performance analysis of clean production and end-pipe treatment
原文传递
导出
摘要 以吉林省为例,应用无残差完全分解模型,将工业污染产生量和排放量的变化分解为规模效应、空间结构效应和技术效应,分析清洁生产和末端治理不同产业生态化策略导向下的环境绩效,探索产业生态化发展改进方向。结果表明:清洁生产的控污效果在数量上大于末端治理的减排效果,产业生态化发展表现出以预防策略为主的特征。但是,环境目标主要通过清洁生产和末端治理来实现,产业生态化集聚发展滞后;清洁生产和末端治理之间的技术效应相关性较差,清洁生产主要通过技术进步来实现污染控制,而技术水平进步和规模的扩长都可以带来末端治理排污强度的降低;吉林省需要在源头预防策略指导下积极推动面向产品过程的污染控制转向面向系统过程的环境管理,促进产业生态系统的形成和发展。 Based on statistics of industrial pollutant yields and discharge quantity in Jilin Province, the non-residual decomposition model was applied to quantify the net amount of environmental benefits of clean production and end-pipe treatment respectively. Environ- mental performances of end-of-pipe and pollution prevention strategies were further analyzed to explore an appropriate way of improving regional industrial ecological transition. The results showed that industrial symbiosis did not exert a positive effect on environment improvement. Technical factor promoted environmental performance improvement in clean production, while both technical factor and scale factor did in end-pipe treatment. Clean production was superior to end-pipe treatment in pollution volume reduction, which implied that prevention strategy dominated over end-of-pipe strategy, but the improvement of clean production tended to slow down. It is necessary to construct a proper industrial ecological system for the realization of environmental goals.
出处 《地理研究》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第3期505-512,共8页 Geographical Research
基金 中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目(KZCX2-YW-342-2) 国家自然科学基金重点项目(40635030)
关键词 环境绩效 完全分解模型 清洁生产 末端治理 吉林省 environmental performance complete decomposition model clear production end-pipe treatment Jilin Province
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Lundberg K, Balfors B, Folkeson L. Framework for environmental performance measurement in a Swedish public sector organization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2009,17(11) :1017-1024.
  • 2Ramos T B. Alves I, Subtil R, et al. The state of environmental performance evaluation in the public sector: The case ofthe Portuguesedefence sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2009, 17(1):36-52.
  • 3Zhou P, Ang B W, Poh K L. Measuring environmental performance under different environmental DEA technolo gies. Energy Economics, 2008,30 ( 1 ) : 1 - 14.
  • 4Srebotnjak T. The role of environmental statisticians in environmental policy: The case of performance measure ment. Environmental Science and Policy, 2007,10(5):405-418.
  • 5Mayer A L. Strengths and weaknesses of common sustainability indices for multidimensional systems. Environment International, 2008,34 (2):277-291.
  • 6Lundberg K, Balfors B, Folkeson L. Framework for environmental performance measurement in a Swedish public sector organization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 9009,17(11):1017-1024.
  • 7关伟.区域水资源与经济社会耦合系统可持续发展的量化分析[J].地理研究,2007,26(4):685-692. 被引量:33
  • 8Wagner M. How to reconcile environmental and economic performance to improve corporate sustainability: Corpo rate environmental strategies in the European paper industry. Journal of Environmental Management, 2005, 76(2) :105-118.
  • 9Basu A J, Zyl D J A. Industrial ecology framework for achieving cleaner production in the mining and minerals industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2006,14(3-4):299-304.
  • 10Wagner M. How to reconcile environmental and economic performance to improve corporate sustainability: Corporate environmental strategies in the European paper industry. Journal of Environmental Management, 2005,76 (2) :105-118.

二级参考文献79

共引文献96

同被引文献273

引证文献20

二级引证文献228

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部