摘要
目的:探讨D型人格个体情绪反应的强度与认知性情绪调节策略的特征,及其影响D型人格个体发生抑郁的相关因素。方法:采用D型人格量表(DS14)评估759名受试的D型人格特征,比较D型人格个体与非D型人格个体在情感强度量表(SAIS)和认知性情绪调节问卷(CERQ)等测验上的得分差异。采用Logistic回归分析影响D型人格个体发生抑郁的相关因素。结果:①D型人格组的正性情感强度得分(3.84±0.77)显著低于非D型人格组的得分(4.14±0.73),负性情感强度得分(4.16±0.72)则显著高于非D型人格组的得分(3.74±0.83)。②D型人格组消极应对的得分(47.43±5.95)显著高于非D型人格组的得分(43.26±5.78),积极应对的得分(65.91±6.94)则显著低于非D型人格组(67.95±6.63)。③正性情感强度、负性情感强度、积极应对及消极应对在D型人格个体抑郁的发生中有显著的影响作用(P<0.05)。结论:D型人格个体存在更强烈的负性情绪反应,且存在认知性情绪调节缺陷。
Objective：To examine the characteristics of emotion intensity and cognitive emotion regulation in subjects with Type D personality,and explore what factors affecting the depression.Methods：The Type D Scale-14（DS14） was used to screen subjects with Type D personality,and they were compared with the controls in SAIS,CERQ and CES-D.Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the related factors affecting the depression.Results：①Compared with the control group,subjects with Type D personality got higher scores in negative intensity,while lower scores in positive intensity.②Subjects with Type D personality had higher scores in negative coping dimension,while lower scores in positive coping than the controls.③The logistic regression analysis showed that positive intensity,negative intensity,positive coping and negative coping affected the prevalence of depression in subjects with Type D personality.Conclusion：Subjects with type D personality have significant negative affect intensity and deficits in cognitive emotion regulation,which affected the prevalence of depression.
出处
《中国临床心理学杂志》
CSSCI
CSCD
2011年第1期96-99,共4页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金
高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金新教师基金项目(200805331003)
十一五国家科技支撑计划(2007BAI17B00)
关键词
D型人格
情绪
强度
认知性调节
Type D personality
Emotion
Intensity
Cognitive regulation
