摘要
法律人孜孜以求的法治究竟如何实现?关注司法实践,从微观和方法层面对其进行反思、批判和改进,可能是迈向这一理想境界的重要途径。判决书为宣示法官依法解决纠纷的过程及其结果的公告,它所表达的内容只能是基于法治立场的合法性论证。该论证至少应当在形式上摒弃政治、经济、舆论、私人情感等法外因素的不当干扰,从法律规则和事实出发论证判决的正当性。为此,笔者以"李庄案"判决书为素材,基于某种法律方法论立场分析了司法裁决证立过程中的修辞现象,并对此进行了一些评价和反思,希望能够促使人们正确认识并认真对待这一判决正当化的有力工具,从而为趋近理想法治提供现实的方法支撑。
How to realize the rule of law which legal professionals desperately pursue for Maybe the answer thereto lies in the concern of judicial practice based on reflection,criticism and improvement from both micro-aspects and methodology.A judgment is the publication for the judge to demonstrate the process and result of dispute resolution according to law.Thus,the judgment should be legitimately argued based on ruling of law.Such argumentation should avoid the unjust interfere from political,economic,public opinion,private sentiment and other factors,rather it should only reach the justifiability on legal norms and facts.Accordingly,through the case study on Li Zhuang,this paper aims to analyze the rhetoric in the demonstration process of the judicial verdict from perspective of legal methodology,accompanied by some comments and reflection.It offers help to understand the effective instrument of justification for judgment so as to provide the actual methodology support for accomplishing the ideal ruling of law.
出处
《北方法学》
2011年第1期67-77,共11页
Northern Legal Science
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究基金项目“论民俗习惯司法适用之制度构建”(项目编号09YJC820064)
中国博士后科学基金项目“民俗习惯司法适用的理论与方法”(项目编号20090461206)的研究成果
关键词
司法裁决证立
法律修辞
李庄案
判决书
demonstration for judicial verdict
rhetoric of law
case of Li Zhuang
judgment
