中国工业环境效率的库兹涅茨曲线检验被引量：97

Examining Kuznets Curve in Environmental Efficiency of China's Industrial Sector

导出

摘要本文测算了我国284个城市工业部门的环境效率,并分析了环境效率与经济增长的关系,从一个新视角检验了环境库兹涅茨曲线。结果表明,2003—2008年环境效率平均值的范围为0.934—0.951,年均的潜在产出损失为6.1%;环境效率与经济增长之间存在倒U型曲线关系,即随着经济增长,环境效率先提高,但在人均GDP超过转折点后开始下降,这与传统的环境库兹涅茨曲线的含义正好相反;虽然当前大部分城市位于倒U型曲线的上升阶段,但已临近转折点。要避免掉入倒U型曲线的下降通道,必须走新型工业化道路,鼓励企业采用更加环保的生产技术,除严格执行环境监管政策外,还应该采取污染税、排污权市场交易机制等经济措施。 The paper measures the environmental efficiency of industry sector of 284 cities in China,and analysis the relations between environmental efficiency and economic growth.It is a new perspective to examine Environmental Kuznets Curve.The results show that：During 2003 to 2008,the average value of environmental efficiency is 0.934 to 0.951 and the average potential output per year is 6.3%.There is a inverted U curve relation between environmental efficiency and economic growth,that means environmental efficiency increases in pace with economic growth,but declines when GDP per capita overtakes the turning point of the curve.It is just the reverse to the traditional Environmental Kuznets Curve.Although the most of cities are on the ascent stages of the inverted U curve at present,the turning point arrivals soon.To avoid the decline passway of the inverted U curve of environmental efficiency-economic growth,new road toward industrialization should take the place of the old,and the enterprises using more environmental technology should be encouraged,and economic policy such as pollution tax,mechanisms of tradable emission permits system etc.must be adopt in addition to the strict execution of the environment regulation policy.

作者袁鹏程施

机构地区大连理工大学经济学院

出处《中国工业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第2期79-88,共10页 China Industrial Economics

基金教育部人文社会科学基金"我国二氧化硫排污权交易政策选择与影响分析:基于CGE模型的动态分析"(批准号09YJC790022) 教育部博士点基金(新教师类)"我国碳减排方案设计与政策模拟研究"(批准号20100041120042) 辽宁哲学社会科学基金"辽宁碳排放与产业结构优化调整研究"(批准号L09CJL033) 中央高校基本科研业务费引进人才科研项目"一般均衡框架下我国碳减排与产业结构调整研究"(批准号852004)

关键词环境效率环境库兹涅茨曲线经济增长 environmental efficiency environmental Kuznets curve economic growth

分类号 F403.3 [经济管理—产业经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献27

1Akbostanci E.,T. R. T-Asik S., and Tun G. I. The Relationship between Income and Environment in Turkey: Is There an Environmental Kuznets Curve[J]. Energy Policy, 2009, 37(3).
2Arrow K.,Bolin B., and Costanza R., et al. Economic Growth, Carrying Capacity, and the Environment[J]. Ecological Economics, 1995, 15 (2).
3Azomahou T.,Laisney F., and Van P. N. Economic Development and Co2 Emissions: A Nonparametric Panel Approach[J]. Journal OF Public Economics, 2006, 90(6-7).
4Cropper M., and Griffith C. The Interaction of Population Growth and Environmental Quality [J]. American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings, 1994, 84(12).
5Dinda S. Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey[J]. Ecological Economics, 2004, 49(4).
6Eskeland G. S., and Harrison A. E. Moving to Greener Pastures? Multinationals and the Pollution Haven Hypothesis[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2003, 70(1).
7Fare R.,Grosskopf S., and Lovell C. A. K., et al. Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs Are Undesirable[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1989, (71).
8Fare R.,Gmsskopf S., and Pasurka C. The Effect of Environmental Regulations on the Efficiency of Electric Utilities: 1969 Versus 1975[J]. Applied Economics,1989,(21).
9Friedl B.,and Getzner M. Determinants of Co2 Emissions in a Small Open Economy [J]. Ecological Economics, 2003, 45 (1).
10Grossman G. M., and Krueger A. B. Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement[M]. The US Mexico Free Trade Agreement,Garber P, Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 1993.