期刊文献+

儿童先天性心脏病双源CT胸部增强扫描剂量分析 被引量:14

Evaluation of radiation dose in chest scan with enhanced dual-source computed tomography in children with congenital heart disease
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析儿童先天性心脏病接受双源cT扫描时辐射剂量。方法70例患儿,年龄1个月至8岁,均接受双源CT胸部增强扫描。将患儿按年龄分为〈1岁组(44例)、1—5岁组(14例)、〉5岁组(12例),使用方差分析比较3个年龄组的双源CT检查辐射剂量,再使用SNK检验两两组间差异;使用多元线性回归分析剂量长度乘积(DLP)与年龄、体重、管电压、管电流、螺距、扫描层数间的关系。结果70例患儿双源cT辐射剂量为DLP=(144.46±74.07)mGy·cm,有效剂量(ED)=(4.68±2.34)mSy。3个年龄组DLP均不完全相同[〈1岁组(104.00±56.26)mGy·cm,1~5岁组(199.00±76.22)mGy·cm,〉5岁组(208.00±73.87)mGy·cm,F=8.26,P=0.0009I,〈1岁组与1~5岁组,〈1岁组与〉5岁组差异均有统计学意义(q值分别为5.21、6.52,P值分别为0.009、0.004),1—5岁组与〉5岁组间差异无统计学意义(q=0.28,P=0.48)。3个年龄组ED[≤1岁组中位数为3.20mSv,1~5岁组为(5.17±1.98)mSv,〉5岁组为(3.74±1.33)mSv,F=0.54,P=0.59],差异没有统计学意义。DLP与年龄(中位数为4.3岁,r=0.54186,P=0.0008)、体重(中位数为12.1kg,r=0.56371,P:0.0004)、管电压[(95.48±6.99)kV,r=0.63269,P〈0.01]、管电流[(138.55±40.67)mA,r=0.79608,P〈0.01]、扫描层数[(236.10±46.51)层,r=0.72192,P〈0.01]均呈正相关,与螺距(0.48±0.03,r=-0.46693,P=0.0047)呈负相关。结论1岁以上先天性心脏病患儿接受双源CT检查的DLP显著高于1岁以下患儿,但由于1岁以下患儿的ED系数高于其他各组,各年龄组ED差异无统计学意义。 Objective To evaluate the radiation dose from enhanced dual-source computed Tomography(DSCT) scan on children with congenital heart disease(CHD). Methods Seventy children with CHD, age from 1 month to 8 years old, were scanned with enhanced DSCT. Children were divided by age into 〈 1 year old group, 1--5 years old group, 〉 5 years old group. The differences among three groups were tested by F test. Then, the SNK test was used to compare the difference between each group. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to test the relationship of dose length product (DLP) with the age, weight, voltage, current, pitch and scan sheet. Results The average value of DLP was (144. 46 ± 74. 07) mGy · cm for all theT0 cases, and that of effective does(ED) was (4. 68 ±2. 34) mSv. There were significant differences of DLP among the 3 groups [ 〈 1 year ( 104. 00 ± 56. 26 ) mGy ·cm, 1--5 years (199.00±76.22) mGy. cm, 〉5 years (208.00±73.87) mGy-cm, F=8.26, P=0.0009]. TheSNK test showed statistical differences of DLP between 〈 1 year old group and 1-5 years old group, and between 〈 1 year old group and 〉 5 years old group ( q = 5.21,6. 52, P = 0. 009,0. 004 ). The difference of DLP between 1-5 years old group and 〉 5 years old group did not reach significant ( q = 0. 28, P = 0. 48 ). The differences of ED was not statistically significant among the three groups [ 〈 1 year 3.20 mSv, 1-5 years (5. 17 ±1. 98) mSv, 〉5 years(3.74 ±1.33) mSv,F =0. 54,P =0. 591. DLP was positively correlatedwith age (4.3 years,r=0.541 86, P= 0.0008), weight (12. 1 kg,r =0.563 71, P= 0. 000d),vohage [(95.48±6.99) kV,r=0.632 69, P〈0.01], current [(138.55 ±40.67) mA,r=0.796 08, P〈 0. 0001 ] and scan sheet (236. 10 ±46. 51, r = 0. 721 92, P 〈 0.01 ). DI,P was negative correlated with pitch (0.48±0.03,r= - 0.46693, P= 0.0047). Conclusion Higher DLP was observed in children over 1 year old under enhanced DSCT scan, but ED was not statistically significant among the three groups due to the higher K value in the children under 1 year old.
出处 《中华放射学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第1期18-21,共4页 Chinese Journal of Radiology
关键词 儿童 心脏缺损 先天性 体层摄影术 X线计算机 辐射剂量 Child Heart defects, congenital Tomography, X-ray computed Radiation dosage
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Dendy PP,Whitehouse GH.Workshop on medical X-ray imaging:potential impact of new EC directive.Report on a meeting held in Malm(o),Sweden,on 13-15 June 1999.Br J Radio1,2000,73:799-801.
  • 2Menzel HG,Schibilla H,Teunen D.European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography.EUR 16262 EN,Luxembourg:European Commission,1999:1-4.
  • 3Food and Drug Administration.FDA public health notification:reducing radiation risk from computed tomography for pediatric and small adult patients.Pediatr Radiol,2002,32:314-316.
  • 4AAPM task group 23 of the diagnostic imaging council CT committee.The measurement,reporting,and management of radiation dose in CT[AAPM Report 96].Washington:American Association of Physicists in Medicine,2008:13.
  • 5潘志立.低剂量螺旋CT扫描技术在儿童中的应用[J].安徽医学,2005,26(1):80-81. 被引量:30
  • 6Paul JF,Rohnean A,Sigal-Cinqualbre A.Multidetector CT for congenital heart patients:what a paediatric radiologist should know.Pediatr Radio1,2010,40:869-875.
  • 7刘昌盛,李茂进,查云飞,谢宝君,魏文洲,潘鄂武,彭宙峰.64排CT冠状动脉成像几种管电流控制方式的比较分析[J].中国医学影像技术,2008,24(9):1473-1475. 被引量:7
  • 8Sun Z,Ng C.Dual-source CT angiography in aortic stent grafting:an in vitro aorta phantom study of image noise and radiation dose.Acad Radiol,2010,17:884-893.
  • 9Goetti R,Leschka S,Baumiller S,et al.Low dose high-pitch spiral acquisition 128-slice dual-source computed tomography for the evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency.Invest Radiol,2010,45:324-330.
  • 10Rogalla P,Blobel J,Kandel S,et al.Radiation dose optimisation in dynamic volume CT of the heart:tube current adaptation based on anterior-posterior chest diameter.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging,2010,26:933-940.

二级参考文献21

  • 1张森,杜湘珂,李剑颖.心电图调制电流对于容积CT心脏扫描图像质量及曝光剂量影响的评估[J].中华放射学杂志,2006,40(9):974-976. 被引量:45
  • 2Naidich D, Marshall C, Gribbin C, et al. Low - dose CT of the lungs: preliminary observations. Radiology, 1990; 175 (3): 729~731.
  • 3Prasad SR, Wittram C, Shepard JA, et al. Standard - dose and 50 % - reduced - dose chest CT: comparing the effect on image quality. AJR, 2002; 179(2) :461~465.
  • 4Brener DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, et al. Estimated risks of radiation- induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR, 2001;176: 289~ 296.
  • 5Rusinek H, Naidich D, Mc Guinness G, et al. Pulmonary nodule detection: low dose versus conventional CT. Radiology,1998;209(1) :243~249.
  • 6Ambrosino MM, Genieser NB, Roche KJ, et al. Feasibility of high-resolution, low-dose chest CT in evaluation the pediatric chest. Pediatr Radiol, 1994; 24: 6~10.
  • 7Jayier L, Joaquim P, Pilar G, et al. Low- dose high- resolution CT of the chest in children and young adults: dose cooperation, artifact incidence, and image quality. AJR, 2000; 175:985~ 992.
  • 8Rogolla P, Stover B, Scheer I, et al. Low- dose spiral CT:applicability to paediatric chest imaging. Pediatr Radiol,1999;29(8) :565~569.
  • 9Polacin A, Kalender WA, Marchal G. Evaluation of section sensitivity profiles and image noise in spiral CT. Radiology,1992; 185(1) :29~35.
  • 10Haaga JR. Radiation dose management: weighing risk versus benefit. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2001,177(2) :289-291.

共引文献35

同被引文献126

引证文献14

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部