期刊文献+

64排CT冠状动脉成像几种管电流控制方式的比较分析 被引量:7

Comparison of different tube current control strategies at 64-row multidetector CT coronary angiography
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的比较64排CT冠状动脉成像的三种管电流曝光技术,探讨其最为合适的管电流控制方式。方法从900例CT冠状动脉成像患者中,回顾性地分析180例CT冠状动脉成像的图像质量,分A、B、C三组,每组60例,使每组病例在年龄、性别、体重、心率四方面无显著性差异(P〉0.05),A组固定管电流700mA扫描;B组按体重为50~65kg、66~80kg、〉80kg分三小组,分别用330~430mA、430~530mA、530~630mA扫描;C组用ECG调制管电流曝光技术扫描;A、B、C三组其余扫描和重建方式相同:120kV、0.35s/360°、层厚0.625mm、螺距pitch0.20~0.26,按标准算法重建图像。由两名副主任医师以双盲法分别对A、B、C三组图像进行质量评分,比较A、B、C三组各自平均CT剂量指数(CTDI)、累计受照射剂量(DLP)和有效剂量(ED)的差值。结果①A、B、C三组图像质量评分分别为3.77分±0.22、3.74分±0.32、3.75分±0.36,对A、B组间,A、C组间差异进行t检验,P〉0.05,无显著性差异。②A、B、C三组各自平均CTDI、DLP和ED分别为122.84±8.82mGy/slice、2356.80mGy-cm、40.07mSv;92.37±5.92mGy/slice、1772.20mGy-cm、30.13mSv;75.02±4.36mGy/slice、1314.00mGy-cm、22.34mSv。C组指标值低于B组,且C组明显低于A组,组间差异有显著性,P〈0.05结论运用ECG调制管电流曝光技术能获得优质的冠状动脉成像质量,同时能有效地减少曝光量及辐射剂量,减少患者的辐射危害。 Objective To investigate the optimal tube current control strategies on 64-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography. Methods One hundred and eighty consecutive patients underwent 64-row multidetector CT coronary angiography (CCTA) for coronary artery disease. They were divided into three groups (each group, n=60) according to different tube current control strategies. Age, weight, generator and mean heart rate were not significantly different among the groups.Group A had undergone CCTA with fixed tube current of 700 mA, group B with 330-430 mA, 43-530 mA and 530-630 mA, respectively, according to weight of 50-65 kg, 66-80 kg and 〉80 kg. However, group C with AutomA exposure control. The scan and reconstruction parameters were as follows: 120 kV, 0.35 s/360°, 0.6 mm section thickness and 0.20-0.26 pitch. The imaging scores were evaluated by two reviewers and the value of noise, CT does index-volume (CTDI), dose length product (DLP) and effective dose (ED) were calculated among the groups, respectively. Results The mean score of imaging quality in group A, group B and group C was 3.77±0.22, 3.74±0.32 and 3.75±0.36, respectively.No significant difference of the mean score was found between group A and group B, group A and group C, respectively(P〉0.05). The value of CTDI in group A, group B and group C was 122.84±8.82, 92.37±5.92 and 75.02±4.36 mGy/slice, respectively, DLP was 2356.80, 1772.20 and 1314.00 mGy-cm, respectively, ED was 40.07, 30.13 and 22.34 mSv, respectively. The value of CTDI, DLP and ED in group C were significant lower than those in group A or group B (P〈0.05). Conclusion The application of ECG-gated AutomA exposure control at 64-row multidetector CT coronary angiography result in significant reduction of effective radiation dose, without significant loss of image quality.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2008年第9期1473-1475,共3页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
关键词 冠状动脉疾病 体层摄影术 X线计算机 血管造影术 Coronary disease Tomography, X-ray computed Angiography
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Haaga JR. Radiation dose management: weighing risk versus benefit. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2001,177(2) :289-291.
  • 2Slovis TL. CT and computed radiography:the pictures are great, but is the radiation dose greater than required? AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2002,179(1) :39-41.
  • 3Kalra M, Maher M, Toth T, et al. Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology, 2004,230(3):619-628.
  • 4Willis C, Slovis T. The ALARA concept in pediatric CR and DR: close reduction in pediatric radiographic exams--a white paper conference. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2005,184(2) :343-344.
  • 5Menzel HG, Schibilla H, Teunen D. GuideLines on radiation dose on the patient. European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Computed Tomography, 2006:32-33.
  • 6Hunold P, Vogt FM, Schmermund A, et al. Radiation exposure during cardiac CT: effective doses at multi-detector row CT and electron-beam CT. Radiology, 2003,226 ( 1 ) : 145-152.
  • 7Li J, Mohr K, Okerlurd D. Dose reduction for CT coronary Artery imaging using a Special Bowtie. Med Phys, 2004,31:1841.
  • 8高建华,戴汝平,郑静晨,王贵生,李剑颖,崔英,赵雯.应用后过滤重组降低64层螺旋CT心脏检查X线剂量的初步研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2007,41(10):1014-1018. 被引量:38
  • 9张森,杜湘珂,李剑颖.心电图调制电流对于容积CT心脏扫描图像质量及曝光剂量影响的评估[J].中华放射学杂志,2006,40(9):974-976. 被引量:45

二级参考文献16

  • 1王晓峰,彭明辰.关于多排螺旋CT剂量的探讨[J].医疗设备信息,2004,19(12):23-25. 被引量:20
  • 2闵祥强,武爱勤,孟祥福,韩广.减少CT扫描辐射剂量的方法探讨[J].中国中西医结合影像学杂志,2004,2(4):298-300. 被引量:10
  • 3高建华,孙宪昶,李剑颖,王贵生,李娜,戴汝平.后置滤过器C_2对64层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像质量的影响[J].中国医学影像技术,2007,23(1):73-76. 被引量:31
  • 4Nikolaou K,Flohr T,Knez A,et al.Advances in cardiac CT imaging:64-slice scanner.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging,2004,20:535-540.
  • 5Flohr TG,Schoepf UJ,Kuettner A,et al.Advances in cardiac imaging with 16-section CT systems.Acad Radiol,2003,10:386-401.
  • 6Slovis TL.CT and computed radiography: the pictures are great, but is the radiation dose greater than required? AJR, 2002,179: 39-41.
  • 7Rogers LF. Dose reduction in CT:how low can we go? AJR ,2002, 179:299.
  • 8Menzel HG, Schibilla H, Teunen D. Guidelines on radiation dose on the patient. European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. 2006:32-33.
  • 9Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, et al. Estimated risks of radiation- induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR ,2001,176:289-296.
  • 10Hunold P, Vogt FM, Schmermund A,et al. Radiation exposure during cardiac CT: effective doses at multi-detector row CT and electron-beam CT. Radiology ,2003,226 : 145-152.

共引文献70

同被引文献55

引证文献7

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部