期刊文献+

尼可地尔与单硝酸异山梨酯治疗稳定型心绞痛疗效对比观察 被引量:16

暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的比较尼可地尔与单硝酸异山梨酯治疗冠心病稳定型心绞痛的疗效。方法将60例冠心病稳定型心绞痛随机分为观察组(n=30例)和对照组(n=30例)。在常规治疗的基础上,观察组口服尼可地尔5mg,3次/d,对照组口服单硝酸异山梨酯20mg,2次/d,两组均治疗4周,观察患者心绞痛及心电图变化。结果治疗4周后观察组治疗效果较对照组明显好转,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组心电图疗效较对照组明显好转,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗期间观察组出现轻微头痛2例(6.6%),对照组出现轻微头痛9例(30.0%),两者比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗期间两组患者均无明显低血压现象发生,也无明显肝肾损害情况。结论尼可地尔治疗冠心病稳定型心绞痛的疗效与单硝酸异山梨酯近似,但其对心电图的改善优于后者,且头痛的不良反应更低。
作者 胡建华
出处 《实用心脑肺血管病杂志》 2011年第1期64-64,66,共2页 Practical Journal of Cardiac Cerebral Pneumal and Vascular Disease
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献53

  • 1李新立,卢新政.钾通道激动剂尼可地尔用于高危稳定型心绞痛患者的疗效[J].世界临床药物,2005,26(4):209-211. 被引量:17
  • 2吴文利,梅霞,罗羽慧.尼可地尔治疗冠心病稳定型心绞痛68例[J].中国药业,2005,14(5):65-66. 被引量:13
  • 3无.慢性稳定性心绞痛诊断与治疗指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(3):195-206. 被引量:2187
  • 4Lawson WE, Hui JC, Lang G. Treatment benefit in the enhanced external counterpulsation consortium. Cardiology, 2000,94 ( 1 ) :31-35.
  • 5Ryden L, Standl E, Bartnic M, et al. Guideline on diabetes, prediabetes and cardiovascular disease:executive summary. The Task Force on Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease of European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the Euopean Association for the Study of Diabetes(EASD). Eur Heart J,2007,28( 1 ) :88-136.
  • 6Crawford MH, Bernstein SJ, Deedwania PC, et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines for Ambulatory Electrocardiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines ( Committee to Revise the Guidelines for Ambulatory Electrocardiography). Developed in collaboration with the North American Society for Pacing and Electrophysiology.J Am Coll Cardiol,1999,34(3) :912-948.
  • 7Campeau L. Letter: Grading of angina pectoris. Circulation 1976 :54(3) :522-523.
  • 8O'Rourke RA, Brundage BH, Froelicher VF, et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Expert Consensus Document on electron-beam computed tomography for the diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000,36(1) :326-340.
  • 9Gibbons Pal, Abrams J, Chatterjee K, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina-sunanary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003,41 ( 1 ) : 159-168.
  • 10Malik S, Wong ND, Franklin SS, et al. Impact of the metabolic syndrome on mortality from coronary heart disease, cardiovascular disease, and all causes in United States adults. Circulation, 2004,110(10) :1245-1250.

共引文献3713

同被引文献119

引证文献16

二级引证文献125

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部