期刊文献+

腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术网片钉合技术与免钉合技术疗效比较的系统评价 被引量:9

Stapled versus unstapled mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair:a systematic review
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的系统评价腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中应用钉合与免钉合技术的疗效。方法检索截至2010年9月PubMed、EMBASE、CENTREN、中国生物医学文献数据库等中所有关于钉合与免钉合腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术疗效比较的临床随机对照试验,并辅以手工检索,对检索文献进行质量评价及筛选,采用RevMan5.0软件对最终纳入文献的研究结果进行meta分析。结果共纳入8个随机对照试验,meta分析结果显示,钉合组与免钉合组疝修补术后复发率(RR=1.24,95%CI0.36~4.26,P=0.74)、并发症发生率(RR=1.18,95%CI0.84~1.65,P=0.34)、术后恢复正常活动天数(MD=0.14,95%CI-0.16~0.44,P=0.37)均无差异,但钉合组手术时间长于免钉合组(MD=4.52,95%CI1.46~7.59,P=0.004)且手术费用高,两组患者术后疼痛情况尚不确定。结论钉合与免钉合技术的临床疗效无明显差异,但钉合技术所需手术时间更长,费用更高,术后疼痛仍需更多设计合理的大样本随机对照试验以明确结论。 Objective To conduct a systematic review on the clinical effectiveness and relative efficiency of stapled and unstapled mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.Methods PubMed,EMBASE,CENTREN,Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL),CBMdisk,and National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI) database were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing stapled and unstapled mesh in the laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia; manual search was also conducted.The obtained literatures were rated and eligible trails were subjected to meta-analysis using RevMan5.0 software.Results Eight trials assessing 1,619 participants were finally included.Meta-analysis showed that there were no significant differences between the compared arms in post-operation recurrence rate (RR=1.24,95%CI 0.36-4.26,P=0.74),total complication (RR=1.18,95% CI 0.84-1.65,P=0.34 ),time to return to normal activity(MD=0.14,95%CI-0.16-0.44,P=0.37).The mesh staple group needed more operative time(MD=4.52,95%CI 1.46-7.59,P=0.004),cost more,and there was no definite conclusion on the post-operative pain in the two groups.Conclusion There is no noticeable difference in the clinical effectiveness between the stapled and unstapled mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair; the stapled mesh costs more,needs more time; and the post-operative pain still needs to be studied by more well-designed and large sample randomized controlled trials.
出处 《第二军医大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第12期1337-1340,共4页 Academic Journal of Second Military Medical University
基金 广西省卫生厅课题(桂卫Z2009082)~~
关键词 腹股沟疝 修补术 腹腔镜 补片 inguinal hernia; repair; laparoscopes; mesh;
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1戎祯祥,陆光生,陈小伍,剧永乐,伍锦浩,朱达坚,张才铭,耿岩,欧阳满照.腹腔镜下完全腹膜外补片植入术治疗腹股沟疝269例报告[J].中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(12):1142-1143. 被引量:28
  • 2Lau H,Patil N G. Selective non-stapling of mesh during unilateral endoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty: a case-control study[J]. Arch Surg, 2003,138 : 1352-1355.
  • 3吴泰相,刘关键.隐蔽分组(分配隐藏)和盲法的概念、实施与报告[J].中国循证医学杂志,2007,7(3):222-225. 被引量:182
  • 4Higgins J P,Thompson S G. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta analysis[J]. Star Med,2002,21 : 1539-1558.
  • 5Ferzli G S,Frezza E E,Pecoraro A M Jr,Ahern K D. Prospective randomized study of stapled versus unstapled mesh in a laparoseopie preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 1999,188 : 461-465.
  • 6Koch C A,Greenlee S M,Larson D R,Harrington J R,Farley D R. Randomized prospective study of totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: fixation versus no fixation of mesh[J]. JSLS, 2006,10 : 457-460.
  • 7Moreno-Egea A, Torralba Martinez J A, Morales Cuenca G, Aguayo Albasini J L. Randomized clinical trial of fixation vs nonfixation of mesh in total extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty[J]. Arch Surg,2004,139:1376-1379.
  • 8Parshad R,Kumar R, Hazrah P, Bal S. A randomized comparison of the early outcome of stapled and unstapled techniques of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair[J]. JSLS, 2005,9 : 403-407.
  • 9Smith A I,Royston C M,Sedman P C. Stapled and nonstapled laparoscopie transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair. A prospective randomized trial[J]. Surg Endosc, 1999,13 : 804-806.
  • 10Taylor C, Layani L, Liew V, Ghusn M, Crampton N, White S. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair without mesh fixation, early results of a large randomised clinical trial[J]. Surg Endosc, 2008,22 :757-762.

二级参考文献28

共引文献276

同被引文献95

  • 1戎祯祥,陆光生,陈小伍,剧永乐,伍锦浩,朱达坚,张才铭,耿岩,欧阳满照.腹腔镜下完全腹膜外补片植入术治疗腹股沟疝269例报告[J].中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(12):1142-1143. 被引量:28
  • 2支永发.疝环充填式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的体会[J].青海医药杂志,2008,38(5):28-29. 被引量:1
  • 3中华医学会外科学分会疝和腹壁外科学组.成人腹股沟疝、股疝和腹部手术切口疝手术治疗方案(2003年修订稿)[J].中华外科杂志,2004,42(14):834-835. 被引量:636
  • 4蔡小勇,卢榜裕.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补的历史、现状及展望[J].微创医学,2007,2(2):122-124. 被引量:32
  • 5Ger R. The management of certain abdominal herniae by intra- abdominal closure of the neck of the sac. Preliminary communi- cation [J]. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 1982, 64(5): 342-344.
  • 6Dion YM, Morin J. Laparoscopic inguinal hemiorrhaphy [J]. Can J Surg, 1992, 35(2): 209-212.
  • 7McKeman JB, Laws HL. Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias using a totally extraperitoneal prosthetic approach [J]. Surg Endosc, 1993, 7(1): 26-28.
  • 8McCormack K, Wake BL, Fraser C, et al. Transabdominal pre- peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review [J]. Hernia, 2005, 9(2): 109-114.
  • 9Wake BL, McCormack K, Fraser C, et al. Transabdominal pre- peritoneal (TAPP) vs totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2005, (1): CD004703.
  • 10Krishna A, Misra MC, Bansal VK, et aL Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach: a prospective randomized contr- olled trial [J]. Surg Endosc, 2012, 26(3): 639-649.

引证文献9

二级引证文献88

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部