摘要
司法权标准存在先验性,经不起追问;研究缺乏价值论的引导,忽视宪法的罗盘作用;缺乏以普遍联系的、发展的、矛盾发展动力观的唯物辩证法思想为指导,存在孤立、静止、片面地看待问题的形而上学倾向;缺乏实践论引导,比较法的运用过于简单,甚至将本体论当作方法论来对待。
The jurisdiction standard existence apriority,cannot withstand presses;The research lacks the theory of value the guidance,the neglect constitution compass function;Lacks take the universal relation,the development,the contradictory development power view materialistic dialectics thought as the instruction,the existence isolated,static,regards the question one-sidedly metaphysics tendency;Lacks on practice guidance,the comparison test utilization is too simple,even treats the ontology as the methodology.
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第3期108-113,共6页
Legal Forum
关键词
检察权
价值论
形而上学
prosecutorial power theory of value metaphysics
