期刊文献+

成都市城市居民SF-12评价研究 被引量:55

Assessing Quality of Life in An Urban Population in Chengdu Using the SF-12
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探索SF-12在我国城市人群中的评价结果。方法对成都市1365名城市居民的生命质量进行评价,并与香港及澳大利亚城市居民常模结果比较。结果成都市城市居民SF-12评价结果与香港及澳大利亚城市居民常模结果基本一致,更接近香港常模结果;成都市不同性别、年龄城市居民的评价结果差异有统计学意义。随着年龄增长,无论是男性还是女性,城市居民的PCS评分均呈下降趋势,但其MCS评分却均呈上升趋势。结论获得成都市不同性别及年龄城市人群SF-12评价结果,为在国内使用SF-12作为生命质量评价工具提供了借鉴参考。 Objective To assess the health-related quality of life in an urban population in Chengdu China using the SF-12. Methods A random sampling strategy stratified by age and sex was adopted to select the participants in Chengdu. A total of 1365 respondents with an age of older than 18 years completed the interviewer- administered SF-12 survey. The physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component summary measures of the SF-12 were calculated using the standard US scoring method and compared to the urban population norms of Hong Kong and Australia. Results Similar PCS and MCS scores were obtained for the urban Chengdu population compared to the Hong Kong and Australian population norms, albeit a closer similarity between the Chengdu and Hong Kong populations. The PCS and MCS scores of the SF-12 changed with sex and age. Condusion The age- and sexadjusted PCS and MCS scores of the SF-12 in the urban Chengdu population can serve as a reference for future studies using the SF-12 in China.
出处 《四川大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第6期1044-1046,共3页 Journal of Sichuan University(Medical Sciences)
基金 国家自然科学基金(批准号30571594)资助项目
关键词 生命质量 SF-12 城市居民 Quality of life SF-12 Urban population
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1方积乾,万崇华,郝元涛.与健康有关的生存质量的研究概况[J].中国康复医学杂志,2000,15(1):40-43. 被引量:147
  • 2江玲.与健康有关的生存质量评定探讨[J].中国康复理论与实践,2002,8(12):768-768. 被引量:1
  • 3李宁秀,刘朝杰,李俊,任晓晖.四川省城乡居民SF-36评价参考值[J].华西医科大学学报,2001,32(1):43-47. 被引量:398
  • 4Fleishman JA, Selim AJ, Kazis LE. Deriving SF-12v2 physical and mental health summary scores t a comparison of different scoring algorithms. Qual Life Res,2010,19(2) :231-241.
  • 5Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care,1996,34(3):220-233.
  • 6Kontodimopoulos N, Pappa E, Niakas D, etal. Validity of SF- 12 summary scores in a Greek general population. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2007 ; 5 : 55.
  • 7Wilson D, Tucker G, Chittleborough C. Rethinking and reseoring the SF-12. So2-Praventivmed,2002;47(3):172-77.
  • 8Lam CLK, Tse EYY, Gandek B. Is the standard SF-12 health survey valid and equivalent for a Chinese population? Qual Life Res,2005 ; 14 (2): 539-547.
  • 9Utah Department of Health. Interpreting the SF-12. 2001 Utah Health Status Survey. USA: Utah Department of Health, 2002:3.
  • 10Avery J, Grande ED, Taylor A. Quality of life in south australia as measured by the SF12 health status questionnaire. Adelaide SA: the South Australian Department of Human Services, 2004:77.

二级参考文献11

共引文献541

同被引文献609

引证文献55

二级引证文献349

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部