期刊文献+

1:10000比例尺土地利用景观指数的粒度效应分析 被引量:22

Granularity Effect Analysis on Landscape Indices of Land Use at 1:10000 Scale
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究目的:基于鹤峰县1:10000土地利用数据,对土地利用数据的景观指数类型及景观水平的粒度效应进行分析。研究方法:GIS和景观格局分析软件应用。研究结果:在类型水平上,景观指数的粒度效应较明显,随粒度的变粗,景观指数可归为单调下降、不规则变化和基本无变化3类;粒度响应最敏感的景观指数为斑块密度;裸地和水田是对粒度响应最敏感的两种土地覆盖类型。在景观水平上,除斑块密度外,其他景观指数粒度效应不明显,斑块密度和面积加权平均分维数的粒度响应最强烈,丰富度指数则最弱。研究结论:粒度效应与所选粒度的变化范围、数据聚合方式、分析景观类型的多少、比例尺的不同都有很大的关系,更深层次的研究需要考虑更加全面。 The purpose of the paper is to conduct a granularity effect analysis on landscape indices of land use in terms of type and level basing on the land use data of Hefeng County at 1:10000 scale. Method employed is the application of GIS and landscape analysis software. The results indicate: (1)the granularity effects of landscape indices are relatively obvious in terms of type level, i.e., as the granularity turning higher the landscape indices can be divided into three types, including: monotonic decrease, irregular variation and basically no variation;(2)landscape indices with the most sensitive granularity effects are in patch density;(3)bare land and paddy field are the two types of land cover that are most sensitive to granularity effects;(4)in terms of landscape levels the granularity effects of other landscape indices are not obvious except the ones in patch density;(5)the granularity effects of patch density and weighted average score dimensions for the area are most intensive while the richness indices of which are lowest. It is concluded that (1)the granularity effects are deeply influenced by the selected granularities in terms of variation range, data aggregation pattern, numbers of analyzed landscape types, differences of scales; (2)therefore in further researches these issues should be considered comprehensively.
出处 《中国土地科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第11期20-26,共7页 China Land Science
基金 "城市与区域生态国家重点实验室开放基金"资助(SKLURE2010-2-5)
关键词 土地利用 分类 景观指数 粒度效应 1:10000比例尺 land use classification landscape indices granularity effect 1:10000 scale
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1陈文波,肖笃宁,李秀珍.景观指数分类、应用及构建研究[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(1):121-125. 被引量:553
  • 2O'Neill RV, Ritters KH, Wickham J D, et al. Landscape pattern metrics and regional assessment[J]. Ecosystem Health, 1999, 5(4) : 225 - 233.
  • 3Peternson G D. Scaling ecological dynamics: Self-organization hierarchical structure and ecological resilience [J]. Climate Change,2000,(44) : 291 -309.
  • 4Lam N, Quattrochi D A. On the issues of scale, resolution, and fractural analysis in the mapping sciences[J]. Prof Geogr, 1992, (44) : 88 - 987.
  • 5Cao C ,N S. Understanding the scale and resolution effects. In: D. A. Quattrochi and M. F. Goodchile, eds[J]. Scale in Remote Sensing and GIS, 1997 : 57- 72.
  • 6Qi Y.,Wu J. G. Effects of changing spatial resolution on the results of landscape pattern analysis using spatial autocorrelation indices[J]. Landscape Ecology, 1996, 11( 1 ) : 39 -49.
  • 7Wu J, Shen W, Sun W, et al. Empirical patterns of the effects of changing scale on landscape metrics[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2002, (17) : 761 -782.
  • 8Wu J. Effects of change scale on landscape pattern analysis: scaling relations[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2004, 19 : 125- 138.
  • 9国庆喜,肖少英.粒度效应对城—乡过渡区景观格局分析的影响[J].东北林业大学学报,2004,32(2):49-51. 被引量:18
  • 10吕一河,傅伯杰.生态学中的尺度及尺度转换方法[J].生态学报,2001,21(12):2096-2105. 被引量:290

二级参考文献140

共引文献1391

同被引文献293

引证文献22

二级引证文献152

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部