期刊文献+

三维直肠腔内超声诊断肛周感染性疾病的临床应用 被引量:4

Clinical application of three-dimensional transrectal ultrasonography to the diagnosis of perianal infections
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨三维直肠腔内超声在定位肛周感染性疾病中内口、瘘管走形、脓腔位置、隐匿灶的价值。方法应用三维直肠腔内超声检查175例患者,其中肛瘘127例,肛周脓肿48例,根据其声像图特征进行内口定位、瘘管走行追踪及检测脓腔位置、隐匿灶。结果定位内口151例,准确率达86.3%(151/175);定位瘘管一条者90例,瘘管两条者37例;检测到55个脓肿病灶,其中皮下脓肿9例,黏膜下脓肿3例,黏膜皮下脓肿4例;低位肌间脓肿16例,高位肌间脓肿11例,坐骨直肠间隙脓肿3例,盆腔间隙脓肿2例。均经手术证实。结论应用三维直肠腔内超声检查肛周感染性疾病,能够准确定位内口、显示瘘管走行,有效检测脓腔位置及隐匿灶,能为临床治疗方法的选择提供必要的诊断依据。 Objective To evaluate the role of three-dimension transrectal ultrasonography in locating the internal opening,trend of fistulas,pus-filled cavity and occult focus in diagnosing perianal infections. Methods 127 cases of anal fistula and 48 cases of perianal abscess were examined by three-dimensional endoluminal ultrasonography. According to the characters of the sonogram and echogram,it located the internal opening,traced the trend of fistulas,and detected the pus-filled cavity's location and the occult focus. Results In 151 cases the internal opening was located with an accuracy rate of 86. 3% ( 151 /175) ; in 90 cases one fistula was located,and in 37 cases two fistulas were located. 55 cases of abscess were examined,including 9 cases of sub-cutaneous abscess,3 cases of sub-mucosal abscess,4 cases of mucosa subcutaneous abscess,16 cases of low intramuscular abscess,11 cases of high intramuscular abscess,3 cases of ischial rectal space abscess,and 2 cases of pelvic space abscess. All the above were confirmed by surgery. Conclusion Three-dimensional endoluminal ultrasonography in diagnosing perianal infections can accurately locate the internal opening,display the trend of fistulas,and effectually detect the pus-filled cavity's location and the occult focus. And it can provide essential diagnostic criteria for choosing the clinical therapy method.
出处 《山东大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2010年第11期106-108,112,共4页 Journal of Shandong University:Health Sciences
关键词 三维直肠腔内超声 肛瘘 肛周脓肿 内口 Three-dimensional transrectal ultrasonography; Anal fistula; Perianal abscess; Internal opening;
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Halligan S, Bartram C I. MR imaging of fistula in ano: are endoanal coils the gold standard[ J ]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1998, 171 ( 1 ) :407-412.
  • 2Stewart L K, McGee J, Wilson S R. Transperineal and transvaginal sonography of perianal inflammatory disease [J]. ARJ AM J Roentgenol, 2001, 177(3) :627-632.
  • 3Beets-Tan R G, Beets G L, Van der Hoop A G, et al. Preoperative MR imaging of anal fistulas: does it really help the surgeon[ J]. Radiology, 2001, 218 ( 1 ) :75-84.
  • 4Santoro G A, Fortling B. The advantages of volume rendering in three-dimensional endosonography of the anorectum[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2007, 50(3):359-368.
  • 5Ratto C, Grillo E, Parello A, et al. Endoanal ultrasoundguided surgery for anal fistulae [J]. Endoscopy, 2005, 37 (8) :722-728.
  • 6Cho D Y. Endosonographic criteria for an internal opening of fistula-in-ano[ J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 1999, 42 (4) : 515-518.
  • 7Seow-Choen F, Burnett S, Bartran C I, et al. Comparison between anal endosonography and digital examination in the evaluation of anal fistulae[J]. Br J Surg, 1991,78 (4) :445-447.
  • 8Konerding M A, Dzemali O, Gaumann A, et al. Correlation of endoanal sonography with cross-sectional anatomy of the anal sphincter[ J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 1999, 50(6) :804-810.
  • 9Buchanan G N, Bartrarn C I, Williams A B, et al. Value of hydrogen peroxide enhancement of three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound in ? stula in ano[ J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2005, 48(1 ) :141-147.

同被引文献32

  • 1吴国柱,吴长君,刘银龙,王俊峰,李舒,张锋,汪勇.经直肠双平面腔内超声诊断肛周脓肿的应用价值[J].中华医学超声杂志(电子版),2011,8(5):1058-1063. 被引量:26
  • 2江军波,陈浠溪,王磊,郁素云.超声诊断在肛门直肠周围脓肿的应用价值[J].中国超声诊断杂志,2005,6(2):143-145. 被引量:6
  • 3JOYCE M, VENIERO J C, KIRAN R P. Magnetic resonance imaging in the management of anal fistula and anorectal sepsis [J]. Clin Colon Rectal Surg, 2008, 21(3): 213-219.
  • 4MAIER A G, FUNOVICS M A, KREUZER S H, et al. Evaluation ofperianal sepsis: comparison of anal endosonog- raphy and magnetic resonance imaging [J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2001, 14(3): 254-260.
  • 5HENRICHSEN S, CHRISTIANSEN J. Incidence offistu- la-in-ano complicating anorectal sepsis: a prospective study [J]. BrJ Surg, 1986, 73(5):371-372.
  • 6LUNNISS P J, PHILLIPS R K. Surgical assessment of acute anorectal sepsis is a better predictor of fistula than microbio- logical analysis [J]. BrJ Surg, 1994, 81(3):368-369.
  • 7EYKYN S J, GRACE R H. The relevance of microbiology in the management of anorectal sepsis [J]. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 1986, 68(5): 237-239.
  • 8TOYONAGA T, MATSUSHIMA M, TANAKA Y, et al. Microbiological analysis and endoanal ultrasonography for diagnosis of anal fistula in acute anorectal sepsis [J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2007, 22(2): 209-213.
  • 9RATTO C, GRILLO E, PARELLO A, et al. Endoanal ul- trasound guided surgery for anal fistula [J]. Endoscopy, 2005, 37(8): 722-728.
  • 10Etienney I,de Parades V. Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonog- raphy in daily proctological practice [J]. Clin Res Hepatol Gastro- enterol, 2011, 35(4):260-270.

引证文献4

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部