期刊文献+

瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚靶控输注麻醉在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的麻醉效果观察 被引量:26

Anaesthetic Effect of Remifentanil and Propofol Composite Target-controlled Infusion on Patients in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的观察瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚靶控输注在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的麻醉效果.方法将腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者280例随机分为瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚靶控输注组(TCI组)和异氟烷复合丙泊酚组(对照组)各140例.比较两组各时间节点血流动力学参数的变化、术毕不同时间节点的苏醒情况和镇静评分.结果与对照组比较,TCI组T1时间节点的SBP、DBP、HR差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);TCI组麻醉恢复的自主呼吸恢复时间、苏醒时间、拔管时间,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);TCI组的5 min、10 min OAAS评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),但30 min后,两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚靶控输注麻醉,在麻醉诱导插管时易导致血压下降、心率减慢、术中血流动力学平稳;术毕苏醒迅速、完全,麻醉安全性高、可控性强. Objective To observe the anaesthetic effect of remifentanil and propofol composite TCIon patients in laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC).Methods 280 laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC)patients were randomly divided into 2 groups:remifentanil and propofol composite target-controlled infusion group(TCI group)and isoflurane and propofol composite target-controlled infusion(control group),140 patients in each group.The changes in hemodynamical indexes,degree and sedation score at different time were compared between two groups.Results The SBP,DBP,and HR at T1 node time in TCI group had significant difference with the control group(P〈0.05).The spontaneous respiration recovery time,wake up time,and tube drawing time in TCI group had significant difference with the control group(P〈0.01).The OAAS score at 5 min and 10 min in TCI group had significant difference with the control group(P〈0.01),but at 30min had no significant difference with the control group(P〉0.05).Conclusions Remifentanil and propofol composite target-controlled infusion(TCI)decrease blood pressure and heart rate during anesthesia induction.However,the hemodynamics is stable during operation,patients wake up quickly and completely after operation.Therefore the anaesthetic method has high security and easy controuability.
出处 《昆明医学院学报》 2010年第10期79-82,共4页 Journal of Kunming Medical College
关键词 瑞芬太尼 丙泊酚 TCI LC 麻醉 Remifentanil Propofol TCI LC Anaesthesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献20

  • 1薛昀,吴新民.靶控输注瑞芬太尼或芬太尼对术前病人异丙酚镇静作用的影响[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2005,25(10):729-732. 被引量:21
  • 2Hirvonen EA, Nuutinen LS, Vuolteenaho O. Hormonal responses and cardiac filling pressures in head-up or head-down position and pneumoperitoneum in patients undergoing operative laparoscopy.Br J Anaesth,1997,78(2):128-133.
  • 3Hirvonen EA, Nuutinen LS,Kauko M.Hemodynamic changes due to Trendelenburg positioning and pneumo-peritoneum during laparoscopic hysterectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,1995,39(7):949-955.
  • 4Glass PS, Hardman D, Kamiyama Y, et al. Preliminary pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of an ultra-short-acting opioid:remifentanil (G187094B). Anesth Analg,1993, 77: 1031-1040.
  • 5Glass PS, Gan TJ, Howell S. A review of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. Anesth Analg, 1999, 89 Suppl: s7-s14.
  • 6Jhavefi R, Joshi P, Batenhorst R, et al. Dose comparison of remifentanil and alfentanil for loss of consciousness. Anesthesiology, 1997, 87: 253-259.
  • 7Conway DH, Hasan SK, Simpson ME, et al. Target-contrelled propofol requirements at induction of anaesthesia: effect of remifentanil and midazolam.Eur J Anaestbesiol,2002.19:580-584.
  • 8Mertens MJ.Olofsen E.Enghers FH.et al.Propofol reduces perioperative remifentanil requirements in a synergiastic manner:response surface modeling of perioperative remifentanil-propofol interactions.Anesthesiology,2003.99:347-359.
  • 9Fragen RJ, Randel GI, Librojo ES, et al. The interaction of remifentanil and propofol to prevent response to tracheal intubation and the start of surgery for outpatient knee arthroscopy. Anesthesiology, 1994, 81:A376.
  • 10曲成业.腹腔镜手术对呼吸与循环的影响[J].国外医学(麻醉学与复苏分册),1997,18(2):98-100. 被引量:37

共引文献827

同被引文献136

引证文献26

二级引证文献143

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部