期刊文献+

XELOX方案与mFOLFOX6方案辅助治疗Ⅲ期胃癌的比较观察 被引量:6

Comparison of XELOX regimen and mFOLFOX6 regimen applying in adjuvant treatment in patients with stage Ⅲ gastric cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:比较XELOX方案及mFOL-FOX6方案在Ⅲ期胃癌患者术后辅助化疗中应用的耐受性,及两组患者3年生存率的差异。方法:分析2004-01-2007-0460例接受术后辅助化疗的Ⅲ期胃癌患者,其中31例患者接受XELOX方案化疗,29例患者接受mFOLFOX6方案化疗,根据NCI-CTC3.0毒性标准来评价化疗的毒性,Kap-lan-Meier法比较两组患者的3年生存率。结果:XELOX组手足综合征发生率明显高于FOLFOX组(51.6%vs13.8%,P<0.05)。两组患者Ⅲ~Ⅳ度毒性发生率均较低,最常见的是恶心呕吐(32.2%vs34.5%)和白细胞下降(12.8%vs17.2%),无治疗相关的死亡。XELOX组和FOLFOX组的3年生存率分别为48.3%和63.0%,差异无统计学意义,P=0.122。XELOX组平均生存期为31.3个月,FOLFOX组为37.4个月,P=0.204。结论:Ⅲ期胃癌患者术后接受XE-LOX方案和FOLFOX方案辅助化疗毒性低、耐受性好、疗效相当,均优于5-FU单药辅助化疗,5-FU联合奥沙利铂的方案将成为胃癌辅助化疗首选方案。 OBJECTIVE:Comparing tolerance and 3-year survival rate of XELOX regimen and mFOLFOX6 regimen applying in adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage Ⅲ gastric cancer.METHODS:Retrospective analyzed consecutive 60 gastric cancer patients with stage Ⅲ gastric cancer from January 2004 to April 2007,among them 31 patients received XELOX regimen,29 received FOLFOX regimen post operatively.NCI-CTC 3.0 criteria was used to evaluate the toxicity.Three year survival rate was compared with Kaplan-Meier survival curves.RESULTS:The adverse events occurrence rate in the two group were not significant different,except the occurrence of hand-foot syndrome was significantly higher in the XELOX group(51.6% vs 13.8%,P0.05).The most common grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ adverse events in both groups were nausea/vomiting (32.2% vs 34.5%) and white blood cell decrease(12.8% vs 17.2%).The 3-year survival rate in XELOX and FOLFOX group was 48.3% and 63.0% respectively (P=0.122).The estimate mean survival time were 31.3 months and 37.4 months respectively (P=0.204).CONCLUSIONS:Both XELOX regimen and mFOLFOX6 regimen are safe and well tolerated when applying in patients with stage Ⅲ gastric cancer.The efficacy of the two regimens is identical.Regimens containing both 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin are superior to 5-fluorouracil alone and should be first choice regimens in adjuvant setting treating stage Ⅲ gastric cancer patients.
出处 《中华肿瘤防治杂志》 CAS 2010年第18期1470-1472,共3页 Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
基金 广东省自然科学基金博士启动项目(94510089010-02630)
关键词 胃肿瘤 辅助化疗 5-氟尿嘧啶 奥沙利铂 药物疗法 联合 gastric neoplasms adjuvant chemotherapy 5-fluorouracil oxaliplatin drug therapy combination
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献22

共引文献14

同被引文献65

  • 1李拥军,邓飞,张雪琴,蔡正斌.XELOX和OLF化疗方案治疗老年晚期结肠癌的疗效及安全性[J].中国老年学杂志,2015,35(1):237-238. 被引量:28
  • 2王肇炎.化疗在胃癌综合治疗中的作用[J].肿瘤研究与临床,2004,16(3):145-146. 被引量:2
  • 3万进,吴泽宇.胃癌的外科治疗现状与问题[J].实用医学杂志,2007,23(18):2793-2795. 被引量:11
  • 4储大同.当代肿瘤内科治疗方案评价[M].北京:北京大学医学出版社,2005:48
  • 5Jeung HC, Rha SY, Noh SH, et al. Adjuvant 5-fluorouracil plus and doxorubiein in D2-3 resected gastric carcinoma: ] 5-year expe- rience at a single institute[J]. Cancer, 2001,91 ( 11 ) : 2016-2025.
  • 6Krook JE, O' Connell MJ, Wieand HS, et al. A prospective ran- domized evaluation of intensive-course 5-fluorouracil plus doxo- rubiein as surgical adjuvant chemotherapy for resected gastric cancer [J]. Cancer, 1991,67(10) :2454-2458.
  • 7Hsu CH,Yeh KH,Chen LT,et al. Weekly 24-hour infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in the treatment of ad- vanced gastric cancers:an effective and low-toxic regimen for pa- tients with poor general condition [J ]. Oncology, 1997,54 (4) 275-280.
  • 8Yeh KH,Cheng AL. Gastric cancer associated with acute dissem- inated intravascular coagulation: successful initial treatment with weekly 24-hour infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil and leucovor- in[J]. Br J Haematol, 1998,100(4) ; 769-772.
  • 9Cen P,Tetzlaff ED, Ajani JA, et al. Contribution of capecitabine for therapy of patients with gastroesophageal cancer: an update of recent phase results[J]. The Clin Risk Manag,2008,4(1) : 137+140.
  • 10Dyar S, Moreno-Aspitia A. Efficacy of bevacizumab-capecitagine in combination for the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer[J]. Breast Cancer,2011,5(3) :239-246.

引证文献6

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部