期刊文献+

后路椎间打压植骨融合治疗腰椎滑脱症的临床观察 被引量:2

Clinical observation of bone graft impaction on posterior intervertebral body fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨后路椎体间打压植骨融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症的临床疗效。方法 2001年1月-2008年7月,采用后路椎体间打压植骨融合术治疗36例腰椎滑脱患者,观察术前、术后及末次随访时的滑脱角、滑脱率、椎间盘高度指数,计算术后滑脱复位率和融合率;采用日本矫形外科学会(Japanese Orthopaedic Association,JOA)评分和Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry disability index,ODI)进行临床疗效评估。结果所有患者获得13~25个月随访,平均随访16.8个月。术后JOA评分和ODI均优于术前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);末次随访与术后比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后的滑脱角、滑脱率和椎间隙高度指数较术前有明显改善,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);而末次随访与术后比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。将术后与末次随访的JOA好转率和滑脱复位率分别进行比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。所有滑脱节段全部融合,无内固定松动、断裂及神经并发症。结论后路椎体间打压植骨融合术是治疗腰椎滑脱症的有效方法之一。 Objective To investigate the clinical effect of bone graft impaction on posterior intervertebral fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods From January 2001 to July 2008, 36 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis were treated by bone graft impaction on posterior lumbar intervertebral fusion (PLIF) with internal fixation. The clinical outcome were evaluated according to Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores and Oswestry disability index (ODI). X-ray evaluation at pre-operation, post-operation and the last follow-up period were performed with slip angle, slip rate and intervertebral disc height, and then the post-operative reduction rate and fusion rate were calculated. Results All patients were followed up from 13 to 25 months (average 16.8 months). Postoperative JOA scores, ODI, slip angle, slip rate and intervertebral height index improved compared with preoperative data (P 0.05), while there were no statistical differences of the above parameters as well as JOA improvement rate and slip reduction rate between postoperative and the last follow-up period (P 0.05). Bony fusions were observed in all cases without neurological complications or internal fixation loosening and breakage. Conclusion Bone graft impaction on posterior intervertebral fusion was one of the effective methods for the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis.
出处 《中国骨科临床与基础研究杂志》 2010年第3期208-211,共4页 Chinese Orthopaedic Journal of Clinical and Basic Research
关键词 腰椎 椎间盘移位 脊柱融合术 骨移植 Lumbar vertebrae Intervertebral disk displacement Spinal fusion Bone transplantation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献21

  • 1赵铁军,张洪美,陈卫衡,顾力军,张磊,孙钢.椎间融合加椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗退变性腰椎不稳的疗效分析[J].中国骨伤,2004,17(10):602-604. 被引量:3
  • 2杨惠林(整理),马宏庆(整理),王根林(整理),蒋定华(整理),周军(整理),朱若夫(整理).全国腰椎退行性疾患座谈会会议纪要[J].中华骨科杂志,2006,26(10):711-716. 被引量:85
  • 3杨惠林 唐天驷.腰椎不稳与腰椎管狭窄专题研讨会纪要[J].中华骨科杂志,1994,14(1):65-65.
  • 4Wihse LL, Newman PH, Macnab I. Classification of spondylolisis and spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop, 1976, ( 117 ) :23-29.
  • 5Meyerding HW. Spondylolisthesis. Surg Ggynecol Obstet, 1932, 54:3371-3373.
  • 6Michael Vostrejs, Richard Ozuna. The role of instrumentation in the degenerative lumbar spine. Curt Opin Orthop, 1999,10 : 148-153.
  • 7Boxall D, Bradford DS, Winter RB, et al. Management of severe spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1979,61 : 479-495.
  • 8Amundsen T, Weber H, Nordal HJ,et al. Lumbar spinal stenosis:conservative or surgical management? A prospective 10-year study.Spine,2000, 25:1424-1435.
  • 9Booth KC, Bridwell KH, Eisenberg BA. Minimum 5-year results of degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and instrumented posterior fusion. Spine, 1999,24 : 1721-1727.
  • 10Lee CK, Vessa P, Lee JK. Chronic disabling low back pain syndrome caused by internal disc derangements. The results of disc excision and posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine, 1995,20:356-361.

共引文献75

同被引文献23

  • 1窦榆生,郝定均,温世明,贺宝荣.两种后路椎间植骨方法治疗腰椎滑脱的疗效比较研究(英文)[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2006,20(7):743-746. 被引量:4
  • 2Meyerding H.Spondylolisthesis:surgical treatment and results[J].Surg Gynecol Obst,1932,(54):371-377.
  • 3Devkota P, Shrestha SK, Krishnakumar R, et al. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the management of spondylolisthesis [J]. Nepal Med Coil J, 2011, 13(1): 46-49.
  • 4La Rosa G, Conti A, Cacciola E et al. Pedicle screw fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis: does posterior lumbar interbody fusion improve outcome over posterolateral fusion [J]. J Neurosurg, 2003, 99(2 Suppl): 143-150.
  • 5Farrokhi MR, Rahmanian A, Masoudi MS. Posterolateral versus posterior interbody fusion in isthmic spondylolisthesis [J]. J Neurotrauma, 2012, 29(8): 1567-1573.
  • 6Cheng L, Nie L, Zhang L. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a prospective controlled study in the Hart nationality [J]. Int Orthop, 2009, 33(4): 1043-1047.
  • 7范子文,黄文铎,张美超.腰椎单、双枚cage置入加椎弓根钉内固定的三维有限元分析比较[J].广卅『医学院学报,2005,33(5):36-39,57.
  • 8Ekman P, Moller H, Tullberg T, et al. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis [J]. Spine, 2007, 32(20): 2178-2183.
  • 9Musluman AM, Yilmaz A, Cansever T, et al. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posteroiateral fusion with instru- mentation in the treatment of low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis: midterm clinical outcomes [J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2011, 14(4): 488-496.
  • 10Weiner BK, Fraser RD. Spine update lumbar interbody cages [J]. Spine, 1998, 23(5): 634-640.

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部