摘要
围绕哥本哈根国际法进程而展开的碳政治博弈,因《哥本哈根协议》的无约束力而造成零和博弈的结果,也使未来国际法进程面临"双轨"抑或"三轨"并进的机制选择,同时,气候变化的国际法治理仍将针对"共同但有区别责任"的适用而展开,国际社会如能经由"人类共同关切事项"明确"共同责任"的内涵,通过实质性公平原则而认同"区别责任"的要旨,推动《哥本哈根协议》的落实和发展,将在"霸权缺失"下的"碳政治"博弈中,以"软法"特有的张力和灵活性,维护"共同但有区别的责任"的国际法地位,并弥合各方分歧,促进"为今世后代保护全球气候"的可持续发展目标的实现。
Copenhagen International Legal Process is facing choice between double or three track approach.Non-binding ＂Copenhagen Accord＂ creates political negotiations result of zero-sum game.At the same time,international law governance will continue to focus on the application of ＂common but differentiated responsibility principle＂ to negotiate.The concept of ＂Common Concern of Humankind＂ and the substantive fairness are the meaning of the principle.As soft law,＂the Copenhagen Accord＂ will promote the ＂protection of global climate for present and future generations of mankind＂ to achieve sustainable development goals under the missing hegemony of the carbon political game.
出处
《时代法学》
CSSCI
2010年第5期116-120,F0003,共6页
Presentday Law Science
基金
国家社会科学基金一般项目"限容和创新:气候变化两大挑战的综合研究"(09BGJ008)的阶段性成果
关键词
碳政治博弈
哥本哈根协议
共同但有区别责任
国际法治理
carbon political game
Copenhagen Accord
common but differentiated responsibilities
international law governance
