期刊文献+

中国上市公司资本结构调整中的羊群行为研究 被引量:3

A Study of Herd Behavior of Capital Structure Adjustment in Chinese Listed Companies
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 现代资本结构理论继承了新古典经济学中行为人理性的假设,忽视了决策者的行为会受到社会的影响而难以完全做到理性。基于行为金融学中的相关理论,从声誉、报酬理论以及信息外部性等方面考察并证实我国上市公司资本结构调整中确实存在羊群行为,且公司的资本结构不仅有向行业均值靠近的趋势,还有模仿行业领导企业资本结构的倾向。 The modern capital structure theory inherits rational-actor assumptions of the neo-classical economics,and thus ignores the fact that the behavior of decision-makers is hardly to be completely rational as they are influenced by the society.Using the behavioral finance theory,this paper investigates the herd behavior of capital structure adjustment in Chinese listed companies from the perspectives of reputation,rewards,and information externalities theories.The empirical results show that companies not only adjust their capital structures to close the industrial mean value,but also copy the leading companies' behavior to decide their capital structures.In other words,these prove the existence of herd behavior when Chinese listed companies adjust their capital structures.
作者 皮莉莉
出处 《广东商学院学报》 北大核心 2010年第5期34-38,47,共6页 Journal of Guangdong University of Business Studies
关键词 资本结构 羊群行为 上市公司 capital structure herd behavior listed companies
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1DE BONDT W F M,THALER R H. Does the stock market overreact? [ J]. Journal of Finance, 1985,40(3 ) :793-808.
  • 2RUBIN D B. Multiple imputation after 18 * years [ J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1996,91 ( 434 ) :473-489.
  • 3OLSEN A R. Behavioral finance and its implication for stock - price volatility[ J ]. Financial Analysit Journal, 1998, 3 : 10 - 18.
  • 4洪锡熙,沈艺峰.我国上市公司资本结构影响因素的实证分析[J].厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2000,50(3):114-120. 被引量:583
  • 5李涛.混合所有制公司中的国有股权——论国有股减持的理论基础[J].经济研究,2002,37(8):19-27. 被引量:121
  • 6PATEL J, ZECKHAUSER R, HENDRICKS D. The rationality struggle: illustrations from financial markets [ J ]. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 1991,81 (2) :232- 236.
  • 7MAUG E, NAIK N. Herding and delegated portfolio management: the impact of relative performance evaluation on asset allocation [ R]. Working paper ( London Business School, London), 1996.
  • 8HALEBLIAN J, RAJAGOPALAN N. A cognitive model of CEO dismissal:understanding the influence of board perceptions, attribu tions and efficacy beliefs [ J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2006,43 (5) : 1009-1026.
  • 9BANNERJEE A V. A simple model of herd behavior[ J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1992,107 ( 3 ) :797-817.
  • 10连玉君.目标资本结构确定与经理人行为模式[J].南方经济,2006,35(7):54-64. 被引量:13

二级参考文献45

共引文献711

同被引文献25

  • 1赵冬青,朱武祥.上市公司资本结构影响因素经验研究[J].南开管理评论,2006,9(2):11-18. 被引量:46
  • 2陆正飞.企业适度负债的理论分析与实证研究[J].经济研究,1996,31(2):52-58. 被引量:87
  • 3连玉君.目标资本结构确定与经理人行为模式[J].南方经济,2006,35(7):54-64. 被引量:13
  • 4Modigliani, Miller. The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment[ J ]. The American Economic Review, 1958, (48) :261 - 297.
  • 5Kim W S, E H Sorensen. Evidence on the Impact of the Agency Costs of Debt in Corporate Debt Policy[ J]. Journal of Finan- cial and Quantitative Analysis, 1986, (21) :131 -144.
  • 6I Friend, LHP Lang. An empirical test of the impact of managerial self- interest on corporate capital structure[ J]. Journal of Finance, 1988, (43) :271 - 281.
  • 7Hamid Mehran. Executive Incentive Plan, Corporate Control and Capital Structure [ J ]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative A- nalysis,1992, (27) :539 -560.
  • 8Michael Firth. The Impact of Institutional Stockholders and Managerial Interests on the Capital Structure of Finns[J]. Manage- rial and Decision Economics, 1995, (16) :167 -175.
  • 9Berger, G Philip, Ofek, Ell, Yennack, David L. Managerial Entrenchment and Capital Structure Decisions [ J ]. Journal of Fi- nanoe, 1997, (52) :1411 - 1438.
  • 10Kumar, Jayesh. Does Ownership Structure Influence Finn Value -Evidence from India[ R]. India: India Gandhi Institute of Development Research, 2004.

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部