摘要
北伐前后,中共在上海曾与虞洽卿等商人有过密切联系,上海三次工人武装暴动即在此背景下展开。在此过程中,虞洽卿曾被视为"资产阶级左派"代表人物,也是工人暴动后在上海建立"临时市政府"的重要合作者。不过,虞与中共的合作主要仍在国民党的框架中进行,当与之有旧谊的蒋介石到上海后,虞便成为蒋重要的财政顾问。尽管虞洽卿的行动,未必能代表上海商界多数商人的倾向,但却反映了某些商人潜在的政治投机心理及对政商关系的刻意经营。由于时势与环境的影响,中共在当时的实际政治斗争中也会弹性运用"阶级分析",来解释其运用虞洽卿等人的政策。但与"资产阶级"合作的失败,却为党内反对派提供了批判依据,甚至影响到后来路线政策的走向。
Over the period spanning the Northern Expedition,the Chinese Communist Party had close contacts with Yu Qiaqing and some other businessmen in Shanghai,and it is against this background that the three armed uprisings of Shanghai work- ers broke out. Throughout this process,Yu Qiaqing was regarded as a representative of ' bourgeois leftists,' and an important partner in building the ' Provisional Municipal Government' in Shanghai after the workers'uprisings. However,the cooperation between Yu Qiaqing and the CCP was still carried out within the Guomindang framework. When his old friend Chiang Kai-shek arrived in Shanghai,Yu Qiaqing became an important financial advisor to Chiang. Though Yu Qiaqing’s behavior perhaps did not represent the inclinations of most businessmen,it reflected the potential for political opportunism in some businessmen’s minds and the deliberate manner with which they managed their relations with the government. Affected by the situation and environment of the time,the CCP also made flexible use of ' class analysis' to explain its policy of using Yu Qiaqing and his ilk. However,the failure of cooperation with the ' bourgeois' provided the opposition within the CCP with a basis for criticism,and even affected the party’s later tendency towards ideologically driven policy.
出处
《近代史研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第5期31-48,共18页
Modern Chinese History Studies
