期刊文献+

髓内与髓外固定治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的疗效比较

Marrow the fixed treatment old age thighbone intertrochanteric bone fracture curative effect to compare with the marrow outside
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:分析髓内与髓外固定治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的疗效.方法: 回顾性分析髓内或髓外固定治疗的95例IFF患者(年龄61~86(75.2±5.9)岁)的临床资料,将患者分为髓外固定组和髓内固定组,利用自行设计的调查表和SF-36健康调查表收患者术前一般资料、术中和术后的相关参数,比较髓外和髓内固定两组相关参数异同.结果: 髓外固定组患者切口长度、手术时间、出血量、功能训练时间及骨折愈合时间显著高于髓内固定组(P〈0.05);两组患者术后并发症发生率及术后1年关节功能的优良率无显著性差异(P〉0.05).结论:髓内固定系统具有操作简单、时间短、创伤小、出血少、负重活动早及并发症较少的优点,是老年IFF患者较理想的选择. Objective:In outside analysis marrow and marrow fixed treatment old age thighbone intertrochanterie bone fracture curative effect. Methods: In outside review analysis marrow or marrow fixed treatment 95 example IFF patient (age 61-86(75.2± 5.9) year old) the clinical material,divides into the patient outside the marrow in the fixed group and the marrow the fixed group, after the examination table and the SF-36 healthy examination table which the use independently designs receives in front of the patient technique the common material, the technique neutral technique related parameter, compared with in marrow outside and marrow fixed two group of related parameter similarities and differences. Results: Outside the marrow the fixed group patient margin length,the surgery time, the hemorrhage quantity, the function training time and the bone fracture cicatrization time obviously is higher than in the marrow the fixed group (P〈0.05) ;After two group of patient techniques complication formation rate and technique latter 1 year joint function fine rate non-significance difference (P〉0.05). Conclusion: In the marrow the fixed system has the operation simple, the time short, the wound small, bleeds few, carries a heavy load the activity early and the complication few merits,is the old age IFF patient ideal choice.
作者 乔玉祥
出处 《按摩与康复医学》 2010年第20期104-105,共2页 Chinese Manipulation and Rehabilitation Medicine
关键词 老年 股骨转子间骨折 固定术 疗效 Old age Thighbone intertrochanteric bone fracture Pexia Curative effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Liporaee FA,Egol KA,Tejwani N,et al.Wbats new in hip fractures? Current concepts.Am J Orthop,2005,34(2):66-74.
  • 2刘阳,王建龙,莫炳宏,柏涛,张雄文.3种内固定技术在股骨转子间骨折治疗中的比较[J].云南医药,2008,29(3):267-268. 被引量:5
  • 3杨军,蒋电明.股骨转子间骨折治疗的进展[J].创伤外科杂志,2009,11(4):374-377. 被引量:33
  • 4赵兴举,王琛,张传厚.Gamma钉与DHS内固定治疗股骨转子间骨折疗效比较[J].山东医药,2004,44(24):71-71. 被引量:2
  • 5宋垣赫,杨卫良,薛冰.三种方法治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的临床比较研究[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2010,12(5):437-441. 被引量:52
  • 6Lin PC,Cbang SY.Functional recovery among elderly people one year after hip fracture surgery.J Nurs Res,2004,12(1):72-82.
  • 7Cole PA,Bhandari M.Whatg new in orthopaedic trauma.J Bone Joint Surg(Am),2005,87(12):2823-2838.
  • 8Sadowski C,Lubbeke A,Saudan M,et al.Treatment of reverse oblique and transverse intertroehanteric fractures with use of an intranmeduller nail or 95 degrees screw-plate:a peospective,rendomized study.J Bone Joint Surg(Br),2002,84:372-381.
  • 9Klinger HM,Baums MH,Eckert M,et al.A comparative study of unstable per-and intertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with dynamic hip screw (DHS) and trochanteric butt-press plate vs.proximal femoral nail (PFN).Zentralbl Chir,2005,130(4):301-306.
  • 10Nuber S,Sch?nweiss T,Rüter A.Stabilisation of unstable trochanteric femoral fractures.Dynamic hip screw (DHS) with trochanteric stabilisation plate vs.proximal femur nail (PFN).Unfallchirurg,2003,106(1):39-47.

二级参考文献44

共引文献150

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部