期刊文献+

经腹腹腔镜与开放肾癌根治术的临床疗效比较 被引量:15

Comparative study of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and open radical nephrectomy
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的比较经腹途径腹腔镜肾癌根治术和开放肾癌根治术的治疗临床效果。方法行经腹腹腔镜肾癌根治术76例(A组),开放肾癌根治术48例(B组),比较两种方法在手术时间、术中出血量、术后肠功能恢复情况、术后下床活动时间、恢复正常工作时间、住院总费用、术后住院总天、术后止痛剂的用量、并发症等指标进行比较。结果 A组在手术中出血量、术后肠功能恢复情况、术后下床活动时间、术后住院总天数、恢复正常工作时间、止痛药用量、并发症方面明显优于B组,差异有显著性(均P<0.01);B组在手术操作时间、住院总费用优于A组,差异有显著性(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜根治性肾切除术具有术中创伤小、术后恢复快、疼痛小的优点,对于T1~T2bN0M0期肾肿瘤,效果优于开放手术。 [Objective] To summary the experience of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and open radical nephrectomy.[Methods]From Jan 2000 to May 2009, we performed 76 (group A) retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and 48 (group B) open radical nephrectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Operating time, amount of bleeding during operation, recovery of intestinal function after operation, ambulation and normal activities after operation , total cost of hospitalization, the hospital stay,analgesics use after operation and complications were compared between group A and group B.[Results]In group A, the amount of bleeding during operation, the recovery of intestinal function after operation, ambulation after operation, the hospital stay, the resume of normal activities after operation,analgesics use after operation and the occurrence of complications were all better than those in group B (P 0.01), while in group B, the operation time, and the total cost of hospitalization were less than group A (P 0.05). Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is superior to open radical nephrectomy with less blood loss, faster recovery and less pain and similar prognosis. [Conclusions]Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy has the advantages of rapid recovery and less pain. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is superior to open nephrectomy for renal tumor of T1~T2bN0M0.
出处 《中国内镜杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2010年第6期622-624,628,共4页 China Journal of Endoscopy
关键词 肾肿瘤 腹腔镜 肾切除术 kidney neoplasms laparoscopy nephrectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1张旭,朱庆国,马鑫,曾晓勇,叶章群,周四维.后腹腔镜肾癌根治术的技术改进及临床效果(附30例报告)[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2002,17(8):402-404. 被引量:128
  • 2CICCO A, SALOMON L, HOZNEK A, et al. Results of retrperitoneal Laparoscopicr adical nephreetomy[J]. J Endourol, 200, 15: 355-359.
  • 3GILL IS, SCHWEIZER D, HOBART MG, et al. Retroperitoneal laparoacopic radical nephrectomy: the Cleveland clinic experience [J]. J Urol, 2000,163: 1665-1670.
  • 4ANDREW JP, YAN Y, JAIME L,et al. Long-tern follow up after, Laparoscopier adieal nephreetomy[J]. J Urol, 2002, 167: 1257-1262.
  • 5JEFFREY A C, ONO Y, RALPH V C, et al. Laparoscopicnephrectomy for renal cell cancer, evaluation of efficacy andsafety: a multicenter experience[J]. Urol, 1998, 52: 773-777.
  • 6ONO Y, KINUKAWA T, HATTORI R, et al. Laparoseopic raclicalnephreetomy for renal cell carcinoma: a five year experience [J]. Urol, 1999, 53: 280-280.

二级参考文献2

共引文献127

同被引文献88

引证文献15

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部