期刊文献+

窄带成像结肠镜对结肠息肉样病变的诊断价值 被引量:9

Colonoscopy with narrow band imaging in diagnosis of colorectal polypoid lesions
原文传递
导出
摘要 探讨窄带成像(NBI)结肠镜对结肠息肉样病变的病理组织类型的预测能力.方法 125例患者接受结肠镜检查诊断结肠息肉样病变173个,根据腺管开口形态及NBI下血管分型判定该病变为肿瘤性病变(结肠腺瘤、结肠癌)或非肿瘤性病变,并与病理结果对照,判定各种方法的敏感性、特异性及准确率.结果 NBI下血管形态鉴别肿瘤性或非肿瘤性病变的敏感性、特异性及准确率(94.83%、91.23%、93.64%)以及隐窝形态结合血管形态鉴别肿瘤性或非肿瘤性病变的敏感性、特异性及准确率(95.69%、96.49%、95.59%)显著高于常规内镜(80.17%、84.21%、81.50%)(P〈0.05).血管形态鉴别腺瘤与结肠癌的敏感性、特异性、准确率为86.90%、100.00%、87.93%.结论 NBI模式下结肠镜检查对息肉样病变的肿瘤性、非肿瘤性,结肠腺瘤、结肠癌的鉴别优于常规内镜检查,接近病理学检查. Objective To investigate the value of colonoscopy with narrow band imaging (NBI) in predicting the histology of colorectal polypoid lesions. Methods A total of 173 colorectal polypoid lesions from 125 patients were included in the study. The lesions were diagnosed as neoplastic (adenoma or cancer)or non-neoplastic based on pit patterns and/or capillary patterns (CP), which was compared with the results of pathology, and the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of each method were evaluated. Results In differentiation between neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of CP (94. 83% , 91. 23% and 93.64% , respectively), and those of CP combined with pit patterns (95. 69% ,96.49% and 95. 59% , respectively) were significantly higher than those of conventional colonoscopy (80. 17% , 84.21% and 81.50% , respectively, P〈0.05). In differentiation between adenoma and cancer,the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of CP were 86.90% , 100.00% and 87.93% , respectively.Conclusion NBI is superior to conventional colonoscopy in differentiation between neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions, as well as in differentiation between adenoma and carcinoma.
出处 《中华消化内镜杂志》 北大核心 2010年第5期256-258,共3页 Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy
关键词 结肠肿瘤 结肠镜检查 诊断 窄带成像技术 Colorectal neoplasm Colonoscopy Diagnosis Narrow band imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献36

  • 1[1]Morson B.President's address.The polyp-cancer sequence in the large bowel.Proc R Soc Med 1974; 67:451-457
  • 2[2]Winawer SJ,Zauber AG,Ho MN,O'Brien MJ,Gottlieb LS,Sternberg SS,Waye JD,Schapiro M,Bond JH,Panish JF.Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy.The National Polyp Study Workgroup.N Engl J Med 1993; 329:1977-1981
  • 3[3]Kato S,Fujii T,Koba I,Sano Y,Fu KI,Parra-Blanco A,Tajiri H,Yoshida S,Rembacken B.Assessment of colorectal lesions using magnifying colonoscopy and mucosal dye spraying:can significant lesions be distinguished? Endoscopy 2001; 33:306-310
  • 4[4]Kudo S,Hirota S,Nakajima T,Hosobe S,Kusaka H,Kobayashi T,Himori M,Yagyuu A.Colorectal tumours and pit pattern.J Clin Pathol 1994; 47:880-885
  • 5[5]Kudo S,Tamura S,Nakajima T,Yamano H,Kusaka H,Watanabe H.Diagnosis of colorectal tumorous lesions by magnifying endoscopy.Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44:8-14
  • 6[6]Kudo S,Rubio CA,Teixeira CR,Kashida H,Kogure E.Pit pattern in colorectal neoplasia:endoscopic magnifying view.Endoscopy 2001; 33:367-373
  • 7[7]General rules for clinical and pathological studies on cancer of the colon,rectum and anus.Part Ⅰ.Clinical classification.Japanese Research Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum.Jpn J Surg 1983; 13:557-573
  • 8[8]Weston AP,Campbell DR.Diminutive colonic polyps:histopathology,spatial distribution,concomitant significant lesions,and treatment complications.Am J Gastroenterol 1995;90:24-28
  • 9[9]Granqvist S,Gabrielsson N,Sundelin P.Diminutive colonic polyps--clinical significance and management.Endoscopy 1979;11:36-42
  • 10[10]Tedesco FJ,Hendrix JC,Pickens CA,Brady PG,Mills LR.Diminutive polyps:histopathology,spatial distribution,and clinical significance.Gastrointest Endosc 1982; 28:1-5

共引文献85

同被引文献97

引证文献9

二级引证文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部