期刊文献+

某储油库地下水有机污染健康风险评价 被引量:35

The Health Risk Assessment of Groundwater Organic Pollution at a Certain Oil Depot
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文以USEPA推荐使用的污染场地健康风险评价方法为基础,结合污染场地实际情况,分析、评价了某储油库地下水有机污染对场址内暴露人群造成的健康风险。评价结果表明:该储油库地下水有机污染物为1,2-二氯乙烷、苯、三氯甲烷和甲苯。污染场址内的工人和居民受到的非致癌风险均小于1,在可接受范围;而污染对场址内的工人和居民产生的致癌风险较大,分别为1.7×10-4、9.0×10-3,是不可接受的。产生致癌风险的主要污染物为1,2-二氯乙烷,占总致癌风险的99.80%,可致人产生多种形态的肿瘤,并具有潜在的遗传毒性。主要暴露途径是吸入吸收,占总致癌风险比例大于70%,其次为口入吸收。皮肤接触暴露途径产生的致癌风险较小,占总致癌风险比例小于1%。 Based on the evaluation method for health risks of contaminated sites recommended by USEPA,in combination with the actual situation of the contaminated site,the authors analyzed and evaluated the health risk of groundwater organic pollution at a certain oil depot.The result shows that the organic pollutants in groundwater of the oil depot include 1,2-dichloroethane,benzene,chloroform and toluene.The non-carcinogenic risk suffered by the workers and residents in the contaminated site is less than 1,which is in the acceptable range.Nevertheless,the workers and residents in the contaminated site suffered a relatively high cancer risk,being 1.7×10-4 and 9.0×10-3,respectively,which are unacceptable.The 1,2-dichloroethane is a major pollutant of carcinogenic risk,accounting for 99.80% of the total cancer risk.It may cause many forms of cancer,and has the potential genetic toxicity.The main exposure way is the inhalation absorption,which accounts for more than 70% of the total cancer risk,followed by oral absorption.The carcinogenic risk via the dermal pathway is negligible,which is less than 1% of the total cancer risk.
出处 《地球学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第2期258-262,共5页 Acta Geoscientica Sinica
基金 中国地质大调查项目"地下水污染调查技术方法研究与信息系统建设"(编号:1212010634610)资助
关键词 健康风险评价 地下水 有机污染 储油库 health risk assessment groundwater organic pollution oil depot
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1韩冰,何江涛,陈鸿汉,谌宏伟,史敬华.地下水有机污染人体健康风险评价初探[J].地学前缘,2006,13(1):224-229. 被引量:110
  • 2孙冬,王玉才,谢春梅.垃圾焚烧烟气中污染物对人体健康风险评价[J].环境卫生工程,2004,12(3):144-147. 被引量:25
  • 3IARC.2006.Complete List of Agents evaluated and their classification[OL].[2009-10-28],http://www.iarc.fr/.
  • 4U.S.EPA.1989.Exposure Factors handbook.Office of Health and Environmental Assessment[OL].[2009-10-28].http://www.epa.gov.
  • 5U.S.EPA.1992.Guidelines for Exposure Assessment.Risk Assessment Forum and U.S Environmental Protection Agency[OL].EPA/600/Z-92/001.http://www.epa.gov.
  • 6U.S.EPA.1998.Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol for Hazardous Waste Combustion Facilities Volume Ⅱ,Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response and USEPA Region 6 Office[OL].[2009-10-28].http://www.epa.gov.
  • 7U.S.EPA.2002.United States Environmental Protection Agency Region Ⅸ[OL].[2009-10-28].http://www.epa.gov/region09/.
  • 8U.S.EPA.2004.Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume Ⅰ:Human Health Evaluation Manual Part E,Supplemental Guidance for Dermal Risk Assessment[OL].Office of Emergency and Remedial Response,Washington DC,http://www.epa.gov.
  • 9U.S.EPA.2008.Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS)[OL].[2009-10-28].http://www.epa.gov/iris/.
  • 10WHO.2005.Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality,(3rd edition)[OL].[2009-10-28].http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health.

二级参考文献13

共引文献126

同被引文献504

引证文献35

二级引证文献581

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部