期刊文献+

3种用药方案治疗胃溃疡的最小成本分析 被引量:3

Cost-minimization Analysis of 3 Kinds of Regimens in the Treatment of Gastric Ulcer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:评价3种不同质子泵抑制剂治疗胃溃疡的疗效和经济学效果。方法:将134例患者按就诊时间分为A、B、C3组,分别给予奥美拉唑+阿莫西林+甲硝唑、雷贝拉唑+阿莫西林+甲硝唑、埃索美拉唑+阿莫西林+甲硝唑,采用最小成本分析法进行评价。结果:3组的痊愈率分别为85.42%、85.71%、86.36%(P>0.05);不良反应发生率分别为6.25%、4.76%、4.54%(P>0.05);药品成本分别为936.32、2011.52、1076.32元。结论:A组方案在临床疗效方面与B、C组无差异,但药品成本优于B、C组方案。 OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and pharmacoeconomic results of 3 kinds of proton-pump inhibitors in the treatment of gastric ulcer.METHODS:134 patients with gastric ulcer were divided into 3 groups according to visiting time order.Group A were given omeprazole,amoxicillin and metronidazole and group B rabeprazole,amoxicillin and metronidazole,group C esomeprazole,amoxicillin metronidazole.Therapeutic efficacies of 3 groups were evaluated using cost minimization analysis.RESULTS:The cure rates of 3 groups were 85.42%,85.71% and 86.36 % respectively(P0.05).The incidence of ADR were 6.25%,4.76% and 4.54% respectively(P0.05).The costs of drug were 936.32,2 011.52 and 1 076.32 yuan respectively.CONCLUSION:Regimen of group A is same to other 2 groups in respect of therapeutic efficacy but better than them in cost of drugs.
出处 《中国药房》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第20期1906-1907,共2页 China Pharmacy
关键词 质子泵抑制剂 胃溃疡 药物经济学 最小成本分析 Proton-pump inhibitor Gastric ulcer Pharmacoeconomics Cost-minimization analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献27

  • 1张林生,刘友林.洛赛克和法莫替丁治疗十二指肠球部溃疡的对比观察[J].中国民间疗法,2005,13(6):24-25. 被引量:1
  • 2王鋆,张钧.药物经济学成本-效果分析[J].药学实践杂志,1995,13(4):193-197. 被引量:462
  • 3Marshall B. Unidentified Curved Bacilli on Gastric Epilthelium in Active Chronic Gastritis[J]. Lancet, 1983,2 : 1273.
  • 4[8]Ji H,Leung M,Zhang Y,et al.Differential structural requirements for specific binding of hon-pep-tide and peptide antagonists to the AT1 angiotensin receptor and identification of amino acidresidves.that determine bringing of the antiby pertensive drug losartan[J].J Biol Clem,1994,26(9):533.
  • 5[9]Timmermans PB.Pharmacological properties of angiotensin-receptor antagonists[J].Can J Cardiol,1999,15(7):26.
  • 6[10]Kloner RA,Weinberger M,Pool JL,et al.Comparative effects of candesartan cilexetil and amlodipine in patients with mild systemil hypertension,comparison of candesartan and amlodipine for safety,tolerability and efficacy (CASTLE) study in vestigations[J].Am J Cardiol,2001,87(6):727.
  • 7.ESC2004年会系列报道[7]:ICTUS研究结果对急性冠脉综合征患者进行早期介入治疗方法提出质疑[C].中国动脉粥样硬化网,.
  • 8The TIMI ⅢB Investigators. Effects of tissue plasminogen activator and a comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: results of the TIMI ⅢB trial [J]. Circulation, 1994, 89:1545-1556.
  • 9Barnett PG, Chen S, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a conservative, ischemia-guided management strategy after non-Q-wave myocardial infarelion: resuhs of a randomized trial [J]. Circulation, 2002, 105:680-684.
  • 10Janzon M, Levin LA, et al. Cost effectiveness of an invasive strategy in unstable coronary artery disease;results from the FRISC Ⅱ invasive trial [J]. Eur Heart J, 2002, 23: 31-40.

共引文献90

同被引文献21

引证文献3

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部