摘要
人们往往忽视康德对于经验因素的重视和肯定,实际上,作为理性主义哲学家,康德指出了人类理性能力的有限性并在其先验哲学中给予经验论思想某种合法性的地位,这既显示了一种对欧洲启蒙主义运动"绝对理性主义"的反思和纠偏,也为西方经验主义的现代建设和发展提供了空间。但康德的"先验论证"和现代经验主义的"约定主义"方法都未能真正解决经验主义的知识普遍性、必然性问题,也致使经验主义的现代发展陷入困境。现代解释学对此有所突破和发展,提出了另一种可能的方向:走向以理解、对话为基础的意义的普遍性,基于交流与对话的视角处理和解决知识的普遍性问题。
Kant＇s stress and confirmation to empirical element are often neglected, but aetually as a rationalist philosopher, he points out the limitation of human rationality and offers empirical thought a status of certain validity in his transcendental philosophy, which presents a reflection and correction of absolute rationalism in the European enlightenment, and pushes the contemporary construction and development of the western empiricism. The essay aims to explore the relationship of Kant and postKant empiricism, the route and the issue in a broad perspective, and to lead empiricism out of the dilemma of transcendental logic by the proposal of a new probable direction, dif- ferent from Kant＇s transcendental argument and the conventionalism of logical positivism, that is the route of modem hermeneutics leading to universality of significance with understanding and dialogue as the basis.
出处
《安徽大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第3期31-38,共8页
Journal of Anhui University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究基金项目(06JA720001)
关键词
康德
经验主义
逻辑先验性
解释学
Kant
empiricism
transcendental logic
hermeneutic
