期刊文献+

西罗莫司对创伤小鼠脾脏树突状细胞诱导T淋巴细胞应答能力的影响 被引量:1

Effect of sirolimus on capacity of splenic dendritic cells from traumatized mice in inducing T cell responses ex vivo
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 了解西罗莫司对创伤小鼠脾脏树突状细胞(DC)诱导异源性T淋巴细胞应答能力的体外调节作用.方法 将24只BALB/c小鼠按随机数字表法分为对照组与创伤组,每组12只.将创伤组麻醉后造成失血合并闭合性骨折,对照组仅麻醉不致伤,24 h后分离2组小鼠脾脏DC.将2组DC分为西罗莫司阴性对照组和创伤组(不用西罗莫司处理),以及西罗莫司阳性对照组和创伤组(用10μg/L西罗莫司处理6 h).检测各组DC自噬活性(用荧光强度值表示)及DC介导的混合淋巴细胞反应(MLR)变化(用吸光度值表示).流式细胞仪检测细胞表面主要组织相容性复合物(MHC)Ⅱ与共刺激分子CD40、CD80、CD86表达.用ELISA法检测LPS刺激后DC中IL-12p40、IL-12p70和IL-10的水平.对数据进行单因素方差分析.结果 (1)西罗莫司阴性创伤组小鼠脾脏DC自噬活性(荧光强度值为13±2)及其介导的MLR强度均较西罗莫司阴性对照组(荧光强度值为22±6)明显减弱(F=212.836,P〈0.05).与西罗莫司阴性对照组和创伤组比较,西罗莫司阳性对照组和创伤组自噬活性(45±8、44±8)均明显增强(F=212.836,P〈0.05或P〈0.01).西罗莫司阳性创伤组MLR强度较西罗莫司阴性创伤组明显增强(F值分别为101.426、86.533,P值均小于0.05).(2)西罗莫司阴性创伤组小鼠脾脏DC表面的MHCⅡ[(60±9)%]及CD40[(4±1)%]表达较西罗莫司阴性对照组[(85±6)%、(8±1)%]明显降低(F值分别为37.918、40.426,P值均小于0.05),西罗莫司阳性创伤组MHCⅡ表达[(78±7)%]较西罗莫司阴性创伤组明显提高(F=37.918,P〈0.05).(3)两罗莫司阴性创伤组小鼠脾脏DC的IL-12p40、IL-12p70表达水平[(120±13)、(10±3)pg/mL]较西罗莫司阴性对照组[(200±25)、(20±6)pg/mL]明显降低(F值分别为218.646、310.253,P值均小于0.05);与西罗莫司阴性对照组和创伤组比较,西罗莫司阳性对照组和创伤组IL-12p40[(560±34)、(540±29)pg/mL]、IL-12p70[(55±8)、(60±11)pg/mL]表达水平均明显提高(F值分别为218.646、310.253,P值均小于0.01),IL-10表达水平降低(F=246.108,P〈0.01).结论 西罗莫司在体外可部分改善创伤小鼠DC功能,并提高其诱导T淋巴细胞的应答能力. Objective To study the ex vivo effect of sirolimus on capacity of splenic dendritic cells ( DC ) from traumatized mice in inducing T cell responses. Methods Twenty-four BALB/c mice were divided into control group and trauma group according to the random number table, with 12 mice in each group. Mice in trauma group were bled followed by closed femor fracture after anaesthesia, while mice in control group were only anaesthetized without injury. Twenty-four hours later DC were isolated from spleens and divided into 4 subgroups: sirolimus devoid control (trauma) groups [consisted of cells from control (trauma) groups, without sirolimus treatment] and sirolimus treated control (trauma) groups [consisted of cells from control (trauma) groups, treated with 10 μg/L sirolimus for 6 hours]. Then their autophagic activity, DC-induced mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) were measured and recorded as fluorescence intensity (FI) value and absorbance value respectively. The expression of major histocompatibility complex class (MHC) Ⅱ and costimulatory molecules CD40, CD80, and CD86 on DC surface were measured with flow cytometry. IL-12p40, IL-12p70 and IL-10 levels in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated DC supernatants were determined by ELISA. Data were processed with one-way analysis of variance. Results (1) Compared with those of sirolimus devoid control group ( FI value = 22 ± 6) , DC autophagic activity ( FI value = 13 ± 2) and DC-induced MLR in mice from sirolimus devoid trauma group were significantly weakened ( F =212.836, P 〈 0.05). Compared with those of sirolimus devoid control (trauma) groups, DC autophagic activity in mice from sirolimus treated control ( trauma) groups ( FI = 45 ± 8, 44 ± 8 respectively) were significantly strengthened ( F =212.836, P 〈0. 05 or P 〈 0. 01). MLR in mice from sirolimus treated trauma group was stronger than that from sirolimus devoid trauma group ( with F value respectively 101. 426, 86. 533 , P values all below 0.05). (2) Compared with those of sirolimus devoid control group [MHC Ⅱ (85 ± 6) % , CD40 (8 ±1)% ], the expressions of MHC II [(60±9)%] and CD40 [ (4 ± 1 )% ] on DC surface from sirolimus devoid trauma group were significantly reduced ( with F value respectively 37.918, 40.426, P values all below 0. 05 ). The expression of MHC Ⅱ from sirolimus treated trauma group [(78 ±7)%] was higher than that from sirolimus devoid trauma group ( F =37.918, P 〈0. 05). (3) IL-12p40, IL-12p70 secretion by DC from sirolimus devoid trauma group [ ( 120 ± 13) , (10 ±3) pg/mL] were significantly reduced as compared with those from sirolimus devoid control group [ (200 ± 25) , (20 ± 6) pg/mL, with F value respectively 218. 646, 310. 253 , P values all below 0. 05 ]. Compared with those from sirolimus devoid control (trauma) groups, IL-12p40 [ (560 ±34) , (540 ±29) pg/mL] , IL-12p70 [ (55 ±8) , (60 ± 11 ) pg/mL] secretion by DC from sirolimus treated control (trauma) groups were obviously enhanced (with F value respectively 218.646, 310.253 , P values all below 0. 01) , while IL-10 secretion levels were significantly decreased ( F =246. 108, P 〈0.01). Conclusions Sirolimus can partially ameliorate DC functions ex vivo in traumatized mice, and further enhance the capacity of DC in inducing T cell responses.
出处 《中华烧伤杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第2期90-94,共5页 Chinese Journal of Burns
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划(2005CB522602) 国家自然科学基金(30772253)
关键词 西罗莫司 创伤与损伤 树突细胞 T淋巴细胞应答 Sirolimus Wounds and injuries Dendritic cells T lymphocyte responses
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Kawasaki T,Choudhry MA,Schwacha MG,et al.Effect of inter-leukin-15 on depressed splenic dendritic cell functions following trauma-hemorrhage.Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,2009,296 (1):C124-130.
  • 2郭靖,王震平,梁华平,谭立志.失血合并闭合性骨折致小鼠脾脏树突状细胞抗原递呈功能下降[J].创伤外科杂志,2007,9(3):252-256. 被引量:7
  • 3Munafo DB,Colombo MI.A novel assay to study autophagy:regulation of autophagosome vacuole size by amino acid deprivation.J Cell Sci,2001,114 Pt 20:3619-3629.
  • 4Randolph GJ,Angeli V,Swartz MA.Dendritic-cell trafficking to lymph nodes through lymphatic vessels.Nat Rev Immunol,2005,5(8):617-628.
  • 5Kubach J,Becker C,Schmitt E,et al.Dendritic cells; sentinels of immunity and tolerance.Int J Hematol,2005,81(3):197-203.
  • 6De AK,Laudanski K,Miller-Graziano CL.Failure of monocytes of trauma patients to convert to immature dendritic cells is related to preferential macrophage-colony-stimulating factor-driven macro-phage differentiation.J Immunol,2003,170(12):6355-6362.
  • 7王震平,梁华平.树突状细胞在介导创伤后迟发型超敏反应受抑中的作用[J].中国医学科学院学报,2007,29(4):501-505. 被引量:4
  • 8韩健,梁华平.严重创伤对小鼠体内单核细胞向树突状细胞分化及迁移过程的影响[J].创伤外科杂志,2007,9(1):36-39. 被引量:4
  • 9Deretic V.Autophagy as an immune defense mechanism.Curr Opin Immunol,2006,18(4):375-382.
  • 10Strawbridge AB,Blum JS.Autophagy in MHC class II antigen processing.Curr Opin Immunol,2007,19(1):87-92.

二级参考文献17

  • 1Shih Ling HWANG,Nancy Pei-Yee CHUNG,Jacqueline Kwai-Yi CHAN,Chen-Lung Steve LIN.Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) is essential for dendritic cell activation and chemotactic responsiveness to chemokines[J].Cell Research,2005,15(3):167-175. 被引量:12
  • 2Reid SD,Penna G,Adorini L.The control of T cell responses by dendritic cell subsets[J].Curr Opin Immunol,2000,12(1):114-121.
  • 3Kelsall BL,Biron CA,Sharma O.Dendritic cells at the hostpathogen interface[J].Nat Immunol,2002,3(8):699 -702.
  • 4Newman TA,Galea I,van Rooijen N.Blood-derived dendritic cells in an acute brain injury[J].J Neuroimmunol,2005,166 (1-2):167-172.
  • 5Pan SC,Hsieh SM,Wang YH.In vitro maturation potential of monocyte-derived dendritic cells is impaired in patients with spinal cord injury:a case-control study[J].Arch Phys Med Rehabil,2005,86 (5):974-978.
  • 6De AK,Laudanski K,Miller-Graziano CL.Failure of monocytes of trauma patients to convert to immature dendritic cells is related to preferential macrophage-colony-stimulating factor-driven macrophage differentiation[J].J Immunol,2003,170(12):6355-6362.
  • 7Randolph GJ,Inaba K,Robbiani DF.Differentiation of phagocytic monocytes into lymph node dendritic cells in vivo[J].Immunity,1999,11 (6):753-761.
  • 8Banchereau J,Steinman RM.Dendritic cells and the control of immunity[J].Nature,1998,392(6673):245-252.
  • 9Quattroc chi KB,Frank EH,Miller CH,et al.Severe head injury:effect upon cellular immune function[J].Neurol Res,1991,13(1):13-20.
  • 10Messingham KA,Fontanilla CV,Colantoni A,et al.Cellular immunity after ethanol exposure and burn injury:dose and time dependence[J].Alcohol,2000,22 (1):35-44.

共引文献8

同被引文献18

  • 1Gilboa E,Nair SK,Llyerly HK.Immunotherapy of cancer with dendritic cell based vaccines[J].Cancer Immunol Immunother,1998,46:82-87.
  • 2Karsten M,Edgar S,Ura B,et al.Immature,but not inactive:the tolerogenic function of immature dendritic cells[J].Immunol Cell Biol,2002,80:477-483.
  • 3Markiewicz M,Kalicinski P,Teisseyre J,et al.SRLmycin in children after liver transplantation[J].Pediatric Transplantation Supplement,2003,35:2284-2286.
  • 4Stelner D,Brunicki N,Bachar-Lustig E,et al.Overcoming T cell-mediated rejection of bone marrow allografts by T-regulatory cells:synergism with veto cells and Rapamycin[J].Exp Hematol,2006,34:802-808.
  • 5Schrepfer S,Deuse T,Sydow K,Trachealallograft transplantation in rats:the role of diferent immunosuppressant on preservation of respirtary epithelium[J].Transplant Proc,2006,38:741-744.
  • 6Benito AI,Frulong T,Martin PJ,et al.Sirolimus (SRLmycin) for the treatment of steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease[J].Transplantation,2001,72:1924-1929.
  • 7Paolo M,Alessia M,Biagio EL,et al.SRLmycin impairs antigen uptake of human dendritic cells[J].Transplantation,2003,75:137-145.
  • 8Zdichavsky M,Jones JW,Ustuner ET,et al.Scoring of skin rejection in a swine compositetissue allograft model[J].J Surg Res,1999,85:1-8.
  • 9Ferguson TA,Kazama H,Signals from dying cellg tolerance induction by the dendriticcell[J].Immunologic Research,2005,32:99-108.
  • 10Nouri M,Gut E,Direct and indirect cross-tolerance of alio-reactive T cells by dendritic cells retained in the immaturestage[J].Transplantation,2002,74:1035-1044.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部