摘要
在刑法理论上必须对量刑基准、量刑情节等问题进行研究,才能为量刑程序的改革提供实体上的支持,从而在量刑环节确立争论点,增强控辩对抗,为法官准确量刑提供素材。没有实体法上的支撑,围绕量刑程序的所有美好设计都可能落空。目前流行的关于量刑基准的各种实务理解均存在诸多不足;寻找量刑基准的方法应当是实证分析法;量刑基准的确立,需要检察官、法官、学者的通力合作。量刑情节具有两面性,对量刑情节的判断可能受非理性因素的影响。在多个逆向情节并存的情况下,立足于抵消说的"综合判断说"基本上是合理的。
The issues of sentencing basis and circumstances should be studied within the substantial criminal law field,so that the reform of sentencing procedure could have the support from substantial law,and by this way the arguable points could be found in the stage of sentencing,the controversy between the prosecution and the defense could be strengthened,and the judge could have more materials to sentence accurately.If not,the design of the sentencing procedure might fail.All current understandings on the sentencing basis in the practice have their defects.The method to decide the sentencing basis should be empirical,and the cooperation of prosecutors,judges and scholars is very important to fix the sentencing basis.The sentencing circumstances have two features so that the judgment of sentencing circumstances might be affected irrationally.When there are several different functional circumstances in a case,the multiple judgment theory based on counteracting theory is basically reasonable.
出处
《法学家》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第2期25-35,共11页
The Jurist
关键词
量刑程序
量刑基准
量刑情节
禁止重复评价
Sentencing Procedure
Sentencing Basis
Sentencing Circumstances
Double Jeopardy
