摘要
一、反倾销报复威胁机制分析:产业视角
分析企业是否对外反倾销申诉,其实质就是比较申诉前后企业所得的总利润的大小。以下模型基于博弈思想.分析企业是否对外发起反倾销申诉的具体行为。
出处
《浙江金融》
北大核心
2010年第4期43-44,共2页
Zhejiang Finance
同被引文献14
-
1唐宇.反倾销保护引发的四种经济效应分析[J].财贸经济,2004,25(11):65-69. 被引量:35
-
2贾西津等.转型时期的行业协会-角色、功能与管理体制.社会科学文献出版社,2003.
-
3Bown, Chad, Bernard Hoekman and Caglar Ozden. The Pattern of U. S. Antidumping: The Path from Initial Filing to WTO Dispute Settlement[ J ]. World Trade Review,2003. 349 -371.
-
4Brander, James and Paul Krugman. "A' Reciprocal Dumping' Model of International Trade," [ J ]. Journal of International Economics, 1983,15(3/4) : 313 -321.
-
5Blonigen, B. and Bown, C. , Antidumping and Retaliation Threats [ J ]. Journal of Interna - tional Economics, 2003. 249 - 27.
-
6Prusa,T. J. Anti-Dumping: A Growing Problem in International Trade[J]. The World Economy, 2005, 28 (5) :683-700.
-
7Prusa, T. J. , Skeath, S. The Economic and Strategic Motives for Antidumping Filings [ R]. NBER Working Paper, No. 8424,2001.
-
8Miyagiwa, K. , Huasheng, S. , Hylke, V. Innovation, Anti-Dumping, and Retaliation [ R 3. CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 7916, 2010.
-
9Blonigen, B. A. , Bown, C. P. Antidumping and Retaliation Threats [ J ]. Journal of International Economics,2003, ( 8 ) : 249 -273.
-
10Prusa,T. J. On the Spread and Impact of Antidumping [J]. Canadian Journal of Economics, 2001, 34 (3) : 591-611.
-
1刘晓辉.用博弈思想化解贸易保护主义[J].中国外汇,2009(7):18-19.
-
2徐少芳.从“囚徒困境”看价格大战[J].长春金融高等专科学校学报,2012(4):28-30.
-
3明悦.把丢失的利润找回来[J].现代工商,2010(5):59-60.
-
4杨文兰.基于博弈论视角的俄欧贸易关系[J].时代经贸(下旬),2007,5(09X):60-62.
-
5师道.是谁撕碎了下属的责任心?[J].中国连锁,2014,0(12):91-91.
-
6余利红,刘海云.我国报复威胁与美国对华反倾销关系实证研究[J].国际经贸探索,2011,27(10):53-61. 被引量:3
-
7肖旭.中小企业应对国际反倾销的挑战与对策[J].商情,2010(15):33-34.
-
8孟慧霞.基于博弈思想的绿色营销实现条件分析[J].生产力研究,2009(22):209-211. 被引量:1
-
9杨仕辉,肖德.反倾销对抗博弈——兼论我国少有对外反倾销申诉的成因分析[J].预测,2000,19(6):28-33. 被引量:24
-
10孔翠娟.基于博弈思想下的拍卖机制[J].才智,2014,0(19):289-289.