期刊文献+

62例亲属活体供者术后围手术期安全的评估 被引量:3

Evaluation of the Peri-operation Safety of Living Relative Donors in Post-operation of 62 Cases
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨亲属活体供者术后围手术期的安全性。方法术前对62例供者的一般状况、重要脏器功能、配型、双肾功能和解剖学进行评估,除外糖尿病、高血压及传染病等。观察术前、术后第1、7天供者的肾功能、术后第1、7天尿常规及发生并发症等情况。结果62例供者术前血肌酐平均为(63.26±13.82)μmol/L,术后第1、7天的血肌酐分别平均为(93.41±25.71)、(85.94±22.63)μmol/L,除3名供者的血肌酐稍高于正常值,余血肌酐均下降至正常范围。62例供者中,术后第1天出现蛋白尿24例,占38.6%;除1例于术后2周时正常外,均于第7天时复查正常。2例术中发生胸膜损伤,经适当处理痊愈。结论亲属活体供肾移植应重视供体安全,术前进行严格的筛选和全面的评估,术中操作规范,术后加强观察和护理,活体供者在围手术期是安全的。 Objective To explore the safety of living relative donors in the peri-operation at post-operation.Methods Pre-operation,sixty-two potential donors were evaluated in such aspects as general condition,major organs function,histocompatibility typing,renal function and anatomy,except diabetes,hypertension and infectious diseases.The results of renal function and the surgical complications of donors were evaluated at pre-operation and post-operation on the first and seventh day.At pre-operation and post-operation.Results 62 donors were identified on the basis of the criteria.Most donors had normal Scr levels,which had a significant increase on the first day of post-operation (93.41± 25.71)μmol/L vs.that pre-operation (63.26±13.82)μmol/L and declined to normal levels ( 85.94± 22.63)μmol/L on the seventh day of post-operation,with the exception of three donors who were found a slight increase of serum creatinine (Scr) exceeding normal range on the first day of post-operation.Proteinuria was observed in 24 cases ( 38.6% ) of 62 cases and the donors recovered on the seventh day.However,there were one donor who recovered in the second week.Two cases of pleural injury were reported and were cured with proper treatment.Conclusion The safety of living donors should be emphasized.It is important that both rigorous selection and preliminary assessment should be performed.Surgical operation is critical for the peri-operation success of living relative kidney transplantation.
出处 《实用临床医学(江西)》 CAS 2010年第3期42-44,共3页 Practical Clinical Medicine
关键词 肾移植 亲属活体供者 围手术期 安全 评估 kidney transplantation living relative donors peri-operation safety evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1彭谦,范淼,黄刚,李子平,叶滨宾.多层CT血管造影在活体肾移植供体术前的应用[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,2008,19(6):402-405. 被引量:20
  • 2Ingelfinger J R.Risks and benefits to the living donor[J].N Engl J Med,2005,353(5):447-449.
  • 3朱兰,曾凡军,刘斌,蒋继贫,张伟杰,陈知水,林正斌,明长生,陈忠华.亲属活体供肾者术后早期的安全性评估[J].中华器官移植杂志,2006,27(5):268-270. 被引量:21
  • 4Ingela F,Fredrik D,Bo B,et al.No evidence of accelerated loss of kidney function in living kidney donors:results from a cross-sectional follow-up[J].Transplantation,2001,72(3):444-449.
  • 5Sahay M,Narayen G,Anuradh A.Risk of live kidney donation:Indian perspective[J].J Assoc Physicians India,2007,55:267-270.
  • 6Grag A X,Muirhead N,Knoll G,et al.Proteinuria and reduced kidney function in living kidney donors:a systematic review,meta-analysis,and meta-regression[J].Kidney Int,2006,70(10):1801-1810.
  • 7Delmonico F,Council of the Transplantation Society.A report of the amsterdam forum on the care of the live kidney donor:data and medical guidelines[J].Transplantation,2005,79(S 6):S53-S66.
  • 8Matas A J,Bartlett S T,Leichtman A B,et al.Morbidity and mortality after living kidney donation,1999-2001:Survey of united states transplant centers[J].Am J Transplant,2003,3(7):830-834.
  • 9Haberal M,Karakayali H,Moray G,et al.Long-term follow-up of 102 living kidney donors[J].Clin Nephrol,1998,50(4):232-235.
  • 10Shokeir A A.Open versus laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy:a focus on the safety of donors and the need for a donor registry[J].J Urol,2007,178(5):1860-1866.

二级参考文献17

  • 1Working Party of the British Transplantation Society and the Renal Association. United Kingdom Guidelines for living donor kidney transplantation. London: British Transplantation Society, 2000: 1-82.
  • 2Weinstein S, Navarre R, Loening S, et al. Experience with live donor nephrectomy. J Urol, 1980, 124:321-323.
  • 3Janoff D, Davol P, Hazzard J, et al. Computerized tomography with 3-dimenstional reconstruction for the evaluation of renal size and arterial anatomy in the living kidney donor. J Urol, 2004,171:27-30.
  • 4Ingela F, Gilbert TT. Long-term risks after living kidney donation. In: Robert SG, Joans W, eds. Living donor kidney trasplanration. UK: Taylor Francis, 2005. 99-112.
  • 5Ramcharan T, Matas AJ. Long-term (20-37 years) follow-up of living kidney donors. Am J Transplant, 2002, 2:959-964.
  • 6Refaie A, Sobh M, Moustafa F, et al. Living-related-donor kidney transplantation outcome in recipients with primary focal-segmental glomerulosclerosis[J]. Am J Nephrol, 1999, 19(1):55-59.
  • 7和田达雄,监修.脏器移植[M].东京:中山书店,1989.186-199.
  • 8Kawamoto S, Montgomery RA, Lawler LP, et al. Multi-detector row CT evaluation of living renal donors prior to laparoscopic nephrectomy[J]. Radiographics, 2004, 24(2):453-466.
  • 9Tunaci A, Yekeler E. Multidetector row CT of the kidneys[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2004, 52(1):56-66.
  • 10Rajamahanty S, Simon R, Edye M, et al. Accuracy of three-dimensional CT angiography for preoperative vascular evaluation of laparoscopic living renal donors [J]. J Endourol, 2005, 19:339-341.

共引文献39

同被引文献32

  • 1Levey AS. Measurement of renal function in chronic renal disease. Kidney Int. 1990;38:167-184.
  • 2Petersen L J, Petersen JR, Talleruphuus U, et al. Glomerular filtration rate estimated from the uptake phase of 99mTc-DTPA renography in chronic renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transpant. 1999; 14: 1673-1678.
  • 3Rehling M, Nielsen LE, Marqversen J. Protein binding of 99Tom-DTPA compared with other GFR tracers.Nucl Med Commun. 2001 ;22(6):617-623.
  • 4Russeil CD, Rowell K, Scott JW. Quality control of technetium-99m-DTPA : correlation of analytic tests with in vivo protein binding in man. J Nucl Med. 1986; 27(4) : 560-562.
  • 5Granerus G, Moonen M. Effects of extrarenal background subtraction and kidney depth correction in the measurement of GFR by gamma camera renography. Nucl Med Commun.1991; 12(6): 519-527.
  • 6Peters AM, Bell SD, Gordon L, et al. Effective background correction on separate technetium-99m-DTPA renal clearance. J Nucl Med.1991 ;32(2): 362-363.
  • 7Gates GF. Computation of glomerular filtration rate with 99Tcm-DTPA : an in-house computer program. J Nucl Med.1984; 25(5):613-618.
  • 8Peters AM, Gordon I, Evans K, et al. Background in 99Tcm DTPA renography evaluated by the impact of its components on individual kidney glomerular filtration rate.Nucl Med Commun. 1988;9(8):545-552.
  • 9Inoue Y, Yoshikawa K, Suzuki T, et al. Attenuation correction in evaluating renal function in children and adults by a camera-based method. J Nucl Med. 2000; 41(5):823-829.
  • 10Awdeh M, Kouris K, Hassan IM, et al. Factors affecting the Gates measurement of glomerular filtration rate.Am J Physiol Imaging. 1990;5(1 ):36-41.

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部