期刊文献+

SF-36量表在胃食管反流病患者生存质量评价中的应用 被引量:21

Application SF-36 scale to evaluate the quality of life in gastroesophageal reflux disease
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨SF-36量表在胃食管反流病(GERD)患者相关生存质量评价中的应用价值。方法121例门诊GERD患者为对象,以SF-36生活质量调查量表为工具,通过问卷调查的形式分析GERD患者的流行病学情况,分析治疗前后患者生活质量的改善情况。结果SF-36量表有良好的信度,各维度的重测信度良好,分半信度为0.93,内部一致性信度的Cronbach'sα系数均在0.700以上;治疗后SF-36生活质量量表的各个指标均有改善,以生理功能和躯体疼痛改善最为明显,其次为生理职能、总体健康、情感职能、心理健康和社会功能(P<0.05,P<0.01),但是活力因子差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论用SF-36生活质量量表可以较准确地评估GERD患者的生活质量状况。 Objective To investigate the SF-36 quality of life survery scale in evaluating the survival quality of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Methods Totally 121out-patient cases with GERD were enrolled. According to SF-36 quality of life survey scale, through the questionnaire form to analyse of the epidemiological situation in patients with GERD, and depending on treatment of patients, to analyze the quality of life. Results All fields demonstrated excellent reliability in test-retest, split-half reliabiIity( r coefficient ranged-0. 93 ) , and internal consis- tency ( Cronbach' s α values 〉0. 700). The SF-36 before and after treatment in all indicators of quality of life scale were improved, especially in physical function and body pain, followed with physical authority, general health, emo- tional function, mental health and social function ( P 〈0. 05, P 〈 0.01 ) ,while no obviously difference in vitality factor ( P 〉 0. 05 ). Conclusion It suggested that the SF-36 quality of life scale could assess the quality of life in GERD accurately.
出处 《疑难病杂志》 CAS 2010年第3期188-190,共3页 Chinese Journal of Difficult and Complicated Cases
关键词 胃食管反流病 SF-36量表 生存质量 Gastroesophageal reflux disease SF-36 scale Quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献36

  • 1李兆申,徐晓蓉,许国铭,邹多武,孙振兴,王雯,叶萍,陆建萍.反流性食管炎的临床特征分析[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2005,22(5):315-318. 被引量:96
  • 2胡景,杨云生,孙刚,彭丽华,黄启阳,孙国辉,蔡逢春,令狐恩强.反流性食管炎内镜诊断及其相关因素分析[J].胃肠病学和肝病学杂志,2007,16(3):205-208. 被引量:8
  • 3柯美云 潘国宗 等.胃食管反流病.现代胃肠病学(上册,第一版)[M].北京:科学出版社,1994.729-739.
  • 4徐勇勇 宇传华 陈平雁等.诊断和筛查试验的研究设计与分析[A].方积乾 主编.医学统计学与电脑实验:第2版[C].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2001.327-344.
  • 5Buysee DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, et al. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index : a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research[ J]. Psychiatry Res, 1989, 28 (2) : 193-213.
  • 6Rosaida MS, Goh KL. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, reflux oesophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease in a multiracial Asian population: a prospective, endoscopy based study [ J ]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2004, 16(5) :495-501.
  • 7El-Serag HB, Johanson JF. Risk Factors for the Severity of Erosive Esophagitis in Helicobacter pylori-Negative Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease [ J ]. Scand J Gastroenterology, 2002, 37(8) :899-904.
  • 8Dickman R, Shapiro M, Malagon IB, et al. Assessment of 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring should be divided to awake and asleep rather than upright and supine time periods [ J ]. Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2007, 19(9) :709-715.
  • 9Dickman R, Green C, Fass SS, et al. Relationships between sleep quality and pH monitoring findings in persons with gastroesophageal reflux disease [ J ]. Clin Sleep Med, 2007, 3 ( 5 ) :505- 513.
  • 10Okamoto K, Iwakiri R, Mori M, et al. Clinical symptoms in endoscopic reflux esophagitis: evaluation in 8031 adult subjects [J]. Dig Dis Sei, 2003, 48(12) :2237-2241.

共引文献1759

同被引文献221

引证文献21

二级引证文献252

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部