期刊文献+

不同亚型肾细胞癌的微血管密度与临床病理因素的关系 被引量:14

Correlation of microvascular density and clinicopathological factors in different subtypes of renal cell carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨CD34和CD31在不同亚型肾细胞癌(RCC)中的表达,及其标记的微血管密度(MVD)与RCC临床病理因素之间的关系。方法采用免疫组化SP法,检测CD34和CD31在149例RCC组织(肾透明细胞癌76例,肾乳头状癌42例,肾嫌色细胞癌31例)中的表达情况。结果肾透明细胞癌、肾嫌色细胞癌和肾乳头状癌组织中CD34标记的MVD分别为128.04±46.44、48.55±14.09和38.12±10.98,CD31标记的MVD分别为98.35±55.05、30.70±17.72和21.604-9.38,肾透明细胞癌组织中CD34标记的MVD和CD31标记的MVD均明显高于肾非透明细胞癌组织(均P〈0.01)。在肾嫌色细胞癌和肾乳头状癌组织中,CD34标记的MVD均明显高于CD31标记的MVD(均P〈0.01)。CD34和CD31标记的MVD均与肾透明细胞癌的组织学分级呈负相关(rCD34=-0.618,P〈0.01;rCD31=-0.442,P〈0.01),也与临床分期呈负相关(rCD34=-0.283,P〈0.05;rCD31=-0.256,P〈0.05),其中CD34的相关性较强;但与肾非透明细胞癌的组织学分级和临床分期无明显的相关性(均P〉0.05)。结论CD34和CD31均能清晰地、选择性地显示RCC的MVD,但CD34比CD31更敏感。肾透明细胞癌的MVD显著高于肾非透明细胞癌。肾透明细胞癌的MVD与组织学分级和临床分期呈负相关,而肾非透明细胞癌的MVD与组织学分级和临床分期并无相关性。 Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the expressions of CD34, CD31 and microvessel density (MVD) in different subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) as well as the relationship between MVD and clinicopathological factors. Methods Expressions of CD31 and CD34 were detected in 149 patients with RCC using SP immunohistochemical staining. The MVD was studied by Weidner's method. Results The expressions of CD31 and CD34 in the clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) (98.35± 55.05, 128.04±46.44) were significantly higher than those in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC) ( 30.70 ± 17.72, 48.55 ±14.09) and papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) (21.60±9.38, 38.12 ± 10.98) (P 〈0.01 ). The MVD value marked by CD31 (30.70 ±17.72, 21.60±9.38) was much lower than that marked by CD34 (48.55 ± 14.09, 38. 12 ± 10.98) between ChRCC and PRCC (P 〈 0.01). Smaller and immatured microvessels and even single endothelial ceUs could be clearly seen. The MVD values marked by CD31 and CD34 were negatively correlated with the pathological grades (rCD34 = -0. 618, P 〈 0.01 ; rCD31 = -- 0. 442, P 〈 0.01 ) and clinical stages ( reD34 = - 0. 283, P 〈 0.05 ; rCD31 = - 0. 256, P 〈 0.05) in CCRCC. But no association was found in non-CCRCC ( P 〉 0. 05 ). Conclusion MVD is significantly correlated with different types of endothelial labeling. The microvascular endothelial cells could be shown clearly by its related antigen labeling such as CD34 and CD31. CD34 is more sensitive than CD31. The MVD of CCRCC is significantly higher than that in non-CCRCC. The expressions of CD31 and CD34 are not correlated with tumor grade and stage in ChRCC and PRCC, while there is a negative correlation in CCRCC.
出处 《中华肿瘤杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第2期117-122,共6页 Chinese Journal of Oncology
关键词 肾肿瘤 微血管密度 临床病理学 Kidney neoplasms Microvessel density, MVD Clinical pathology
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Sandlund J, Hedberg Y, Bergh A, et al. Evaluation of CD31 (PECAM-1)expression using tissue microarray in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Tumour Biol, 2007, 28:158-164.
  • 2Des Guetz G, Uzzan B, Nicolas P, et al. Microvessel density and VEGF expression are prognostic factors in colorectal cancer: meta- analysis of the literature. Br J Cancer, 2006, 94:1823-1832.
  • 3Sabo E, Boltenko A, Sova Y, et al. Microscopic analysis and significance of vascular architectural complexity in renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res, 2001, 7:533-537.
  • 4Imao T, Egawa M, Takashima H, et al. Inverse correlation of microvessel density with metastasis and prognosis in renal cell carcinoma. Int J Urol, 2004, 11:948-953.
  • 5Weidner N. Intratumor microvessel density as a prognostic factor in cancer. Am J Pathol, 1995, 147:9-19.
  • 6Shchors K, Evan G. Tumor angiogenesis: cause or consequence of cancer? Cancer Res, 2007, 67:7059-7061.
  • 7Maclennan GT, Bostwick DG. Microvessel density in renal cell carcinoma: lack of prognostic significance. Urology, 1995, 46: 27-30.
  • 8Thielemann A, Kopczyflski Z, Filas V, et al. The determination of VEGF and MVD, among patients with primary breast cancer. Pathnl Oncol Res, 2008, 14 : 137-144.
  • 9李捷,宋三泰,江泽飞,刘晓晴,颜玲娣.血管内皮生长因子及微血管密度在乳腺癌中的表达及意义[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2003,25(2):145-147. 被引量:36
  • 10Baldewijns MM, Thijssen VL, Van den Eynden GG, et al. Highgrade clear cell renal cell carcinoma has a higher angiogenic activity than low-grade renal cell carcinoma based on histomorphological quantification and qRT-PCR mRNA expression profile. Br J Cancer, 2007, 96 : 1888-1895.

二级参考文献11

  • 1Weidner N, Folkman J, Pozza F, et al. Tumor angiogenesis: a new significent and independent prognostic indicator in early-stage breast carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1992, 84:1875-1887.
  • 2Augustin HG. Angiogenic tumor therapy: will it work? Trends Pharmacol Sci, 1998, 19:216-222.
  • 3Gospodarowicz D, Ferrara N, Schweigerer L, et al. Structural characterization and biological functions of fibroblast growth factor.Endocr Rev,1987, 8:95-114.
  • 4Van der Zee R, Murohara T, Lao Z, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular permeability factor augments nitric oxide release from quiescent rabbit and human vascular endothelium. Circulation, 1997,95 : 1030-1037.
  • 5Toi M, Hoshina S, Takayanagi T, et al. Association of vascular endothelial growth factor expression with tumor angiogenesis and with early relapse in primary breast cancer. Jpn J Cancer Res, 1994, 85:1045-1049.
  • 6Bosari S, Lee AK, DeLellis RA, et al. Microvessel quantitation and prognosis in invasive breast carcinoma. Hum Pathol, 1992,23:755-761.
  • 7Van Hoef ME, Knox WF, Dhesi SS, et al. Assessment of tumour vascularity as a prognostic fator in lymph node negative invasive breast cancer. Eur J Cancer, 1993,29A:1141-1145.
  • 8Medri L, Nanni O, Volpi A, et al. Tumor microvessel density and prognosis in node-negative breast cancer. Int J Cancer, 2000,89:74-80.
  • 9Fantanini G, Bigini D, Vinnati S, et al. Microvessel count predicts metastatic disease and survival in non-small cell lung cancer. J Pathol,1995,177:57.
  • 10Ohta Y, Shridhar V.Thrombospondin-1 expression and clinical implications in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Cancer, 1999,85:2570-2576.

共引文献37

同被引文献89

引证文献14

二级引证文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部