规范性制度对新课程政策实施的影响及其政策意义被引量：18

The Influence of Normative Institutions on New Curriculum Policy Implementation and Its Policy Implications

下载PDF

导出

摘要在新课程政策实施过程中,至少有三套规范性制度对学校教师的行为产生了影响,教师觉得他们应该履行不尽相同甚至存在冲突的三方面社会责任。被教师认为最重要的不是实施新课程政策,新课程政策并未成功完成社会价值的权威分配。进一步推进和完善新课程,就需要政策推动者高度重视并善于对社会规范和价值观进行有创造力的构架。 There are at least three sets of normative institutions influencing teachers' ways of implementing the new curriculum policy.Teachers feel they should comply with three different and even conflicting social obligations.The most important self-perceived social obligation is not implementing the new curriculum.The new curriculum policy has not successfully achieved the authoritative allocation of values.An innovative framework for constructing social value and norms is deadly needed to further advance the new curriculum policy.

作者柯政

机构地区华东师范大学课程与教学研究所

出处《北京大学教育评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第1期101-113,共13页 Peking University Education Review

基金 2009年上海市浦江人才计划

关键词规范性制度新课程政策实施

分类号 G423 [文化科学—课程与教学论]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献25

1Hill, M. & Hupe, P. (2002). Implementing Public Policy : Governance in Theory and in Practice. London: Sage.
2柯政.学校变革困难的新制度主义解释[J].北京大学教育评论,2007,5(1):42-54. 被引量：67
3Hargreaves, A. , & Fullan, M. (1998). What's Worth Fighting for Out There? New York: Teachers College Press, 67.
4Meyer, H.D. & Rowan, B. (2006). The New Institutionalism in Education. New York: State University of New York Press.
5March, J.G. & Olsen, J.P. (2006). Elaborating the "New Institutionalism". R. A. W.Rhodes et al (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, 3-22. New York: Oxford University Press.
6Hudson, J. & Lowe, S. (2004). Understanding the Policy Process. Bristol: Policy Press, 149-150.
7Krasner, S.D. (1988). Sovereignty: An institutional perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 21, 66-94.
8柯政.学校对研究性学习的回应行为分析[J].教育发展研究,2008,28(24):67-70. 被引量：7
9Scott, W.R. (2001). Institutions and Organizations (2nd Ed. ). London: Sage,12.
10柯政.课程改革过程中的教育督导行为分析[J].教育发展研究,2009,29(10):43-48. 被引量：7

二级参考文献55

1崔允漷,王少非.关于新课程的评议:一种视角[J].教育发展研究,2005,25(5):12-17. 被引量：24
2杨四耕.基于常识与理性的判断——上海二期课改观察报告[J].上海教育科研,2005(10):10-14. 被引量：5
3布迪厄,P.华康德,[1992],李猛等,译..实践与反思[M]..北京:中央编译出版社,,2004....
4Eulau, H & Prewitt, K. Labyrinths of Democracy: Adoptions, Linkages, Representations, and Politics in Urban Politics [M]. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1973. 465.
5崔允都.期待突破的“森林之旅”[N].中国教育报,2005-11-13.
6Hay, C. The "Crisis" of Keynesianism and the Rise of Neoliberalism in Britain: An Ideational Institutionalist Approach[A]. In J.L. Campbell & O.K. Pedersen (eds), The Rise of Neoliberalism and Institutional Analysis[C]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.201.
7Scott,W.R.Institutions and Organizations:Theory and Research[M].Thousand Oaks:Sage,2001.
8Wohlstetter,P.The Polities of Legislative Oversight:Monitoring Educational Reform in Six States[J].Policy Studies Review,1989,9(1).
9Ball,S.J.Education Reform:A Critical and Post-structural Approach[M].Buckingham:Open University Press,1994.20.
10DiMaggio,PJ.,Powell,W.W.The Iron Cage Revisited:Institutional Isomorphism and Colleetive Rationality in Organizational Fields[J].American Sociology Review,1983,48.