吸收能力对合作创新绩效的影响研究——来自中小电子信息科技企业的证据被引量：10

Research of the Effects of Cooperative innovation and Absorptive Capacity on Innovation Performance——From Small Electronic and Information Technology Enterprises

下载PDF

导出

摘要利用109家中小电子和信息科技企业的数据,采用多层线性模型检验吸收能力对四种合作策略与创新绩效关系的影响,发现:和供应商合作及和顾客合作能够改善创新绩效,和竞争者合作降低创新绩效,和科研院所合作与创新绩效的关系不显著;吸收能力显著提升与供应商合作和与科研院所合作的创新绩效,但对和顾客合作及和竞争者合作的创新绩效影响并不显著。 Using the data of 109 small electronic and information technology companies, the hierarchical linear model is adopted to test the relation of the four cooperative strategies and innovation performance and absorptive eapacity＇s effect on it. Some interesting findings appear. Supplier collaboration and customer collaboration can significantly improve innovation performance; Competitor collaboration reduces innovation performance; The relation of research institute collaboration and innovation performance is insignificant. Absorptive capacity positively affects the impact of supplier collaboration and research collaboration institutions on innovation performance, but it does not significantly improve the relation of customer collaboration , competitor collaboration and innovation performance.

作者任爱莲

机构地区东华大学旭日工商管理学院河南财经学院工商学院

出处《科学管理研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第1期70-73,83,共5页 Scientific Management Research

基金上海科技发展基金软科学项目(086921009)

关键词合作创新创新绩效吸收能力多层线性回归模型 cooperative innovation innovation performance absorptive capacity hierarchical linear regression model

分类号 F270 [经济管理—企业管理] G305 [文化科学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献16

1Kuen-Hung Tsai. Collaborative networks and product innovation performance:toward a contingency perspective [J].Research Policy 2009,14 (3): 201- 211.
2Lane, P.J. , Slak, J. Absorptive capacity, learning, and perforrnanee in international joint ventures[J]. Strategic Management Journal 2001,22 (10) :1139-1161.
3Miotti, L., Sachwald, F. Co-operative R&D: why, and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis[J] . Research Policy 2003,32 (8) : 1481- 1499.
4Faems, D. , Van Looy, B. Inter-organizational collaboration and innovation., toward a portfolio approach. Journal of Product Innovation[J]. Management 22 (3):238- 250.
5Nieto, M.J. , Santamaria, L. The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation[J]. Technovation 2007,27 (3) : 367- 377.
6Sanchez, A.M. Cooperation and the ability to minimize the time and cost of new product development within the Spanish automotive supplier industry[J].Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2003,20 (1): 57 - 69.
7Freel, M.S. Sectoral patterns of small ? rm innovation, networking and prox-imity. Research Policy[J]. 2003, 32 (4) :751-770.
8Ledwith, A., Coughlan, P. Splendid isolation: does networking really increase new product success? [J]. Creativity and Innovation Management 2005,14 (4):366 - 373.
9Belderbos, R.. Co-operative R&D and ? rm performance[J].Researeh Poliey 2004a,33 (10) : 1477- 1492.
10Loof, H. , Heshmati, A. Knowledge capital and performance: a new ? rm level innovation study[J].International Journal of Production Economic 2003, 76 (1): 61-85.

二级参考文献36

1彭卫民,任啸.风险资本投入对技术创新的作用与相关运作分析[J].西南交通大学学报（社会科学版）,2002,3(4):77-81. 被引量：10
2Chesbrough,H.,Open innovation,the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology[M].,Harvard business school press,2003.
3Teece,D.J.Profiting from technological innovation:Implications for integration,collaboration,licensing and public policy[J].Research Policy,1986,15(6):285-305.
4Cohen,W.M.& Levinthal,D.A.,Absorptive Capacity:A Now Perspective on Learning and innovation[J].Administratire Science Quarterly,1990,35:128-152.
5van Hippel,E.,The Sources of Innovation[M].Oxford University Press,Now York,1988.
6Rosenberg,N.Why do firms do basic research (with their own money)[J].Research Policy,1990,19(2):165-174.
7Caloghirou,Y.,Kastelli,I.& Tsakanikas,A.,Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources:complements or substitutes for innovative performance[J].Technovation,2004,24:29-39.
8Mowery,D.C.,Oxley,J.E.,and Silverman,B.S.Strategic alliance and interfirm knowledge transfer[J].Strategic Management Journal,1996,17,77-91.
9Laumen,K.& Salter,A.Open for innovation:The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms[J].Strategic Management Journal,2006,27(2):131-150.
10Laursen,K.& Salter,A.The Paradox of Openness:Appropriability and the Use of External Sources of Knowledge for Innovation[C].Paper presented at the Academy of managemeat Conference,2005,august 5-10.