期刊文献+

单纯前方牵引矫治器矫治骨性Ⅲ类错[牙合]的软硬组织的改变 被引量:4

Changes of hard and soft tissue of skeletal anterior cross bite patients treated with protraction headgear appliance only
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的初步探讨单纯前方牵引矫治器治疗骨性Ⅲ类错[牙合]的软组织、硬组织的改变。方法选择17名骨性前牙反[牙合]的患者,男9名,女8名,年龄7~12岁,平均年龄9.8岁,平均疗程13.4月,未进行扩弓直接应用前方牵引矫治器进行治疗。术前术后拍头颅侧位片,测量17名患者治疗前后软硬组织的改变。头影测量采用Dentalvision软件,记录软硬组织的变化。结果上颌骨前移1.8mm,差别具有显著性差异,上前牙唇倾4.2度,差别有显著性差异,上前牙前移3.4mm,差别有显著性差异。下颌骨后退4.1mm,差别具有显著性差异,下切牙后退3.9mm,差别具有显著性差异。软组织的改变:上唇突、下唇突、面型角、上唇-审美距、下唇-审美距、鼻点-H线、下唇-H线、颏沟点-H线的距离均向正常值靠拢,差别具有显著性差异,提示患者的面型更加协调。结论单纯前方牵引矫治器治疗骨性Ⅲ类错[牙合]也能达到较好的效果,使患者的软硬组织得到明显改善。 Objective To evaluate the change of hard and soft tissue in patients with skeletal anterior cross bite treated with protraction headgear appliance. Method 17 patients aged from 7-12 years(mean 9. 8 years) with skeletal anterior cross bite were selected. Cephalometric amalysis was performed before and after orthodontic therapy. Dental vision software was used to analyze changes. Result Significant differences were found in A-OLp, B-OLp, U1-OLp, L1-OLp, ULP, LLP, FCA, UL-E, LL-E, N-H, Sn-H, LL-H, Si-H. Conclusion Protraction headgear appliance was effective and it could give patients a more harmony profile.
作者 王秀婧 阎燕
出处 《中华口腔正畸学杂志》 2009年第4期211-214,共4页 Chinese Journal of Orthodontics
关键词 单纯前方牵引矫治器 骨性Ⅲ类错[牙合] Protraction headgear appliance Anterior cross bite
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献20

  • 1陈淑玲,闫红窈,张杰.采用FR—Ⅲ型矫治器治疗安氏Ⅲ类错[J].中华口腔正畸学杂志,1997,13(2):77-78. 被引量:25
  • 2[1]Williams M,Sarver D,Sadowsky P,et al.Combined rapid maxillary expansion and protraction facemask in the treatment of class Ⅲ malocclusions in growing children:A prospective long-term study.Semi orthod,1997,4(3):265-274.
  • 3[2]Guyer E,Ellis E,McNamara J,et al.Components of Class Ⅲ Malocclusion in Juveniles and Adolescents.Angle Orthod,1986,56 (1):7-30.
  • 4[3]Kyung-Suk Cha,Skel,et al.Changes of Maxillary Protraction in Patients Exhibiting Skeletal Class Ⅲ Malocclusion:a comparison of 3 skeletal maturation groups.Angle Orthod,2003,73 (1):26-35.
  • 5[4]Baik HS.Clinical results of maxillary protraction in Korean children.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,1995,108(6):583-592.
  • 6[5]Franchi L,Baccetti T,McNamara JA.Postpubertal assessment of treatment timing for maxillary expansion and protraction therapy followed by fixed appliances.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2004,126 (5):555-568.
  • 7[6]Richard Lowy.Maxillary protraction and mandibular retraction.Int J Orthod Dentistry for Children,1934,20 (12):1173-1177.
  • 8[7]Macdonald K,Kapust A,Turley P.Cephalometric effects of combined palatal expansion and facemask therapy on class Ⅲ malocclusion with maxillary expansion/facemask therapy.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,1999,116(1):13-24.
  • 9[8]Franchi L,Baccetti T,McNamara JA,et al.Shape-coordinate analysis of skeletal changes induced by rapid maxillary expansion and facial mask therapy.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,1998,114(4):418-426.
  • 10[9]Kapust AJ,Sinclair PM,Turley PK.Cephalometric effects of face mask/expansion therapy in Class Ⅲ children:A comparison of three age groups.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,1998,113 (2):204-212.

共引文献91

同被引文献34

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部