期刊文献+

抽奖促销与赠券促销有效性比较研究:一个促销价值模型 被引量:13

Comparative Research on Promotion Attractiveness between Lucky Draw and Coupon: A Promotion-Value Model
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文依据展望理论发展了一个促销价值模型,提出了决定抽奖促销比现金券促销更有吸引力的边界条件,并通过两个实验研究获得了验证。研究发现,针对抽奖促销与现金券促销:相对吸引力受到促销设计特点的调节作用,中奖率较大的抽奖促销吸引力小于现金券促销,而中奖率很低的抽奖促销却很可能比现金券促销更有吸引力;相对吸引力受到产品特点的调节作用,对于高价产品低中奖率的抽奖促销比现金券促销更有吸引力,对于低价产品两种促销方式的促销吸引力没有显著差异;相对吸引力受到消费者风险态度的调节作用,对于偏好风险的消费者低中奖率的抽奖促销比现金券促销更有吸引力,对于厌恶风险的消费者现金券促销比低中奖率的抽奖促销更有吸引力。 Based on the Prospect Theory, this paper develops a promotion-value model, and identifies the boundary conditions for comparing promotion attractiveness between lucky draw and cash coupon. Two experiments are conducted to verify the model and boundary conditions. Research findings indicate that:(1) the relative attractiveness of lucky draw versus cash coupon is moderated by the characteristics of sales promotion schemes designs, and lucky draw promotion with medium-large winning probabilities is less attractive than cash coupon promotion, while lucky draw promotion with small probabilities can be more attractive than cash coupon protnotion;(2) the relative attractiveness is moderated by the product's characteristics, for high-price products lucky draw promotion is more attractive than cash coupon promotion, while for low-price products there is no significant differences in attractiveness between cash coupon and lucky draw promotions; (3) the relative attractiveness is moderated by consumer risk attitudes, for risk-prone consumers lucky draw promotion is more attractive than cash coupon promotion, while for risk-averse consumers cash coupon promotion is more attractive than lucky draw promotion.
出处 《管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第12期80-85,100,共7页 Management Review
基金 国家自然科学基金项目资助(70772001) 教育部“长江学者和创新团队发展计划”项目资助(IRT0860)
关键词 促销模型 现金券 抽奖 促销吸引力 展望理论 promotion model, cash coupon, lucky draw, promotion attractiveness, prospect theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Yeshin,Tony.Sales Promotion[M].London: Thomson Learning,2006.
  • 2Mela,Carl F,Kamel Jedidi and Douglas Bowman.The Long Term Impact of Promotions on Consumer Stockpiling Behavior[J]. Journal of Marketing Research,1998,35(2):250-262.
  • 3Ailawadi,Kusum L, Scott A Neslin and Karen Gedenk.Pursuing the Value-Conscious Consumer: Store Brands versus National Brand Promotions[J]. Journal of Marketing,2001,65(1):71-89.
  • 4金立印.促销活动效果比较研究——诱因类型、获得时机和条件限制对促销效果的影响[J].管理评论,2008,20(8):34-42. 被引量:43
  • 5Kahneman,Daniel,and Amos Tversky.Prospect theory:an analysis of decision under risk[J]. Econometrica,1979,47:263-290.
  • 6Shi,Yi-Zheng, Ka-Man Cheung, and Gerard Prendergast. Behavioural Response to Sales Promotion Tools: A Hong Kong Study[J]. International Journal of Advertising,2005,24(4):467-486.
  • 7Chandon,Pierre,Brian Wansink,and Gilles Laurent.A Benefit Congruency Framework of Sales Promotion Effectiveness[J]. Journal of Marketing,2000,64(4):65-81.
  • 8Huff, Lenard C,and Dana L Alden. An investigation of consumer response to sales promotions in developing markets: A three-country analysis[J]. Journal of Advertising Researeh,1998,38(3):47-56.
  • 9贾建民.行为经济学和决策制定——2002年度诺贝尔经济科学奖评论之一[J].中外管理导报,2002(10):5-8. 被引量:11
  • 10Kuhberger, Anton.The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1998,75(1):23-55.

二级参考文献34

  • 1韩睿,田志龙.促销类型对消费者感知及行为意向影响的研究[J].管理科学,2005,18(2):85-91. 被引量:102
  • 2Llais M. (1953), Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque, critique des postulats et axiomes de l'ecole americaine, Econometrica, 21:503-546.
  • 3Allais M. (1979), The foundations of a positive theory of choice involving risk and a criticism of the postulates and axioms of the American school, in Allais M. and Hagen O. (ed.), Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox D. Reidel, Holland, 27-145.
  • 4Camerer C. (1995) Individual decision making, in J.H. Kagel and A.E. Roth (eds.), The Handbook of Experimental Economics, Princeton University Press.
  • 5Edwards W. (1954), Behavioral decision theory, Annual Review of Psychology, 12:473-498.
  • 6Kahneman D. and Tversky A..(1979), Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica, 47:263-290.
  • 7Kahneman D. and Tversky A. etc. (2000), Choices, Values, and Frames, Cambridge University Press.
  • 8Savage L.J. (1954), The Foundations of Statistics, Wiley.
  • 9Simon H.A. (1956), Rational choice and the structure of the environment, Psychological Review, 63:120-138.
  • 10The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (2002), Foundations of behavioral and experimental economics:Denial Kahneman and Vernon Smith, Advanced Information on the Prize in Economic Sciences.

共引文献52

同被引文献137

  • 1崔珊珊,陈宏,俆加胜.电商促销井喷需求下的应急商品配送研究[J].中国管理科学,2013,21(S1):141-147. 被引量:14
  • 2韩睿,田志龙.促销类型对消费者感知及行为意向影响的研究[J].管理科学,2005,18(2):85-91. 被引量:102
  • 3韩睿,田志龙.参考价格与消费者的价格感知[J].广东财经职业学院学报,2005,4(3):76-81. 被引量:7
  • 4魏中龙.营销组合理论的发展与评析[J].北京工商大学学报(社会科学版),2006,21(5):57-61. 被引量:19
  • 5林建煌 庄世杰 龚昶元.消费者行为中冲动性购买的前因与后果之模型.商管科技季刊,2005,.
  • 6Kahn B E, McAlister L. Grocery revolution, the new focus on the consumer, reading [M]. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1997.
  • 7Mela C F, Gupta S, Lehmann D R. The long-term impact of promotion and advertising on consumer brand choice [J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1997, 34 (May): 248-61.
  • 8Promotion marketing association of America Inc. Winning with promotion power: The reggie awards winners[M]. Ravenswood, IL.. Dartnell Corp. 1994.
  • 9Godes D, Mayzlin D, Chen Yubo, et al. The firm's management of social interactions [J].Marketing Letters, 2005, 16(3/4): 415-428.
  • 10Zhang Juanjuan. The sound of silence: Observational learning in the U. S. kidney market [J].. Marketing Science, 2010, 29(2): 315-335.

引证文献13

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部