农业企业社会责任动机对财务绩效的影响被引量：11

How Agricultural Corporate Social Responsibility Motivation's Impact on Corporate Financial Performance

下载PDF

导出

摘要运用扎根理论研究方法,对沪深两市中14家农业企业2008年的社会责任表现数据进行分析,构建农业企业社会责任动机与财务绩效的关系模型并进行检验。得出战略动机有助于提高企业财务绩效,而利他动机对财务绩效的影响以负面为主,但不排除因赢得社会声誉提高财务绩效的可能性;产品创新和过程创新的契合度调节了企业社会责任表现对财务绩效的影响,即产品创新、过程创新与企业社会责任表现的协调一致能够有效提高企业财务绩效。 This research attempts to establish a theoretical model for the influence of corporate social responsibility motivation of agricultural firms on financial performance based on grounded theory. Then, this paper examines the model by using the data about corporate social performance of 14 agricultural firms selected from Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets. The result indicates that strategic motivation can improve the financial performance of these firms. Altruistic motivation, for the most part, is found to have a negative effect on financial performance. But it is also impossible for this motivation to promote financial performance if this motivation brought more social reputation for this firm. The production and process innovation have moderating effects on the influence of social responsibility performance on financial performance. In other words,it is more effective to improve financial performance of corporations if production and process innovation comport with their corporate social responsibility performance.

作者姜俊

机构地区华中科技大学管理学院

出处《工业工程与管理》北大核心 2009年第6期72-76,共5页 Industrial Engineering and Management

关键词农业企业社会责任动机财务绩效扎根理论 agricultural firms corporate social responsibility motivation financial performance grounded theory

分类号 F276 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献12

1Clydeirikur H,Rothenberg S. Firm Performance: the Interactions of Corporate Social Performance with Innovation and Industry Differentiation[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2008,29: 781-789.
2Freeman R E. Strategic Management:A Stakeholder Approach [M]. PitmanPublishing Inc. , 1984.
3Williamson O E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism[M]. MacMitlian, New York, 1985.
4Mackey A,Mackey T R,Barney J. Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: investor preferences and corporate strategies[J]. Academy of Management Review ,2007,32(3) :817-835.
5Friedman M. Capitalism and Freedom [ M]. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 19 6 2.
6McWilliams A, Siegel D. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000,21 : 603-609.
7Douglas A, Margaret. A corporate social performance-oorporate finandal performanoe behavioral model for consurners[J]. Academy of Management Review,g006,31(3):540-558.
8Gerwin L, Hans E,Witteloostuijn Arjen. Corporate social and financial performance: An extended stakeholder theory and empirical test with accounting measuresEJ]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2008,79 (3) : 299-310.
9Glaser B G,Strauss A L. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research [M]. New York: Aldine Publishing Company, 1967.
10凯西.卡麦兹,边国英译.建构扎根理论:质性研究实践指南[M].重庆大学出版社,2009.

二级参考文献7

1Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R. E. and Peng, M. W. vip Editor's Introduction: Strategy Research in Emerging Economies: Challenging the Conventional Wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 2005, (42): 1-33.
2徐淑英,刘忠明.中国企业管理的前沿问题研究.北京:北京大学出版社,2004.
3Strauss AL. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
4Strauss,A.,&Corbin,J.著,徐宗国译.质性研究概论.北京:巨流图书公司,1997.
5Goulding, C.. Grounded theory: A Practical Guide for Management, Business and Market Researchers. London: Sage, 2002.
6Suddaby, R. What Grounded Theory Is Not. Academy of Management Journal, 2006,(49):633-642.
7陈向明.扎根理论的思路和方法[J].教育研究与实验,1999(4):58-63. 被引量：1452