期刊文献+

全数字化乳腺摄影对乳腺癌的诊断价值 被引量:9

Diagnostic value of full-field digital mammography for breast carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价全数字化乳腺摄影(FFDM)对乳腺癌的诊断价值。方法搜集2008年1月至7月间230例女性乳腺疾病患者的临床资料以及乳腺X线片(其中有8例患者为双侧乳腺病变)。术前所有患者均行FFDM检查,常规拍摄双侧乳腺头尾位(CC)和内外斜位(MLO)。3位擅长乳腺影像诊断的放射科医师对乳腺X线片分析,并进行乳腺影像学报告数据系统(BI-RADS)分级。以术后病理结果为金标准,评价FFDM检查诊断乳腺癌的敏感度、特异度和准确率,并分析漏诊和误诊的原因。结果术后病理结果显示,238例手术乳腺标本中,130例为恶性肿瘤,其中最常见为浸润性导管癌(109例);108例为乳腺良性病变,其中最常见为乳腺病(57例)。乳腺恶性肿瘤最常见的X线表现为肿块(40.8%),其次为肿块伴钙化(20.8%)。共发现假阴性12例,假阳性14例。FFDM检查对乳腺癌诊断的敏感度、特异度和准确率分别为90.8%、87.0%和89.1%。漏诊最主要的原因是某些乳腺癌的X线表现正常(5例)或X线表现为局灶性非对称性致密(4例)。误诊最主要的原因是将边缘模糊、毛刺、分叶的肿块误诊为恶性肿瘤(7例)。结论FFDM检查诊断乳腺癌的敏感度、特异度和准确率均较高,具有重要的临床应用价值。 Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of full-field digital mammography for breast cancer. Methods The clinical data and mammograms of 230 patients with breast diseases between January 2008 and July 2008 were collected and reviewed. Craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) view mammograms were performed in all patients before surgery. Three experienced radiologists in breast imaging assessment analyzed and classified all the mammograms according to breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were evaluated according to their pathological diagnosis. The reasons resulting in false-negative and false-positive diagnosis were also analyzed. Results Of the 238 samples, 130 had a malignant breast tumors and 108 cases of benign breast lesions. One hundred and nine of the 130 malignant breast tumors were invasive ductal carcinoma. Fifty-seven of the 108 benign breast lesions were breast adenosis. Masses or masses with microcalcifieation were the most frequently seen signs of the malignant tumors, accounting for 40.8% and 20.8%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of FFDM in detecting breast carcinoma were 90.8%, 87.0% and 89.1%, respectively. The false-negative signs including negative X-ray finding (5 cases) and focal asymmetric densities (4 cases). The false-positive signs were masses with spiculate, indistinctive or lobulated margin leading to misdiagnosing the lesions as malignant tumors. Conclusion Full-field digital mammography (FFDM) is helpful in detection of breast cancers in women, with a higher sensitivity, specificity and accuracy, and has an important clinical application value.
出处 《中华肿瘤杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第11期854-857,共4页 Chinese Journal of Oncology
基金 上海市科委优秀学科带头人项目(07XD14007)
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 乳房X线摄影术 图像处理 计算机辅助 Breast neoplasms Mammography Image analysis, computer-assisted
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1唐瑞英,高文,马丽华,林本耀,徐光炜.348例乳腺良恶性疾病的X线征象描述与诊断[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2000,22(6):523-523. 被引量:5
  • 2张保宁,张慧明.老年人乳腺癌治疗的研究现状与展望[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2008,30(3):161-164. 被引量:19
  • 3Skaane P,Young K,Skjennald A.Population-based mammography screening:comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--Oslo I study.Radiology,2003,229:877-884.
  • 4Yankaskas BC,Taplin SH,lehlkawa L,et al.Association between mammography timing and measures of screening performance in the United States.Radiology,2005,234:363-373.
  • 5Kolb TM,IAchy J,Newhouse JH,et al.Comparison d the performance of screening mammography,physical examination,and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them:an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.Radiology,2002,225:165-175.
  • 6American College of Radiology.Breast imaging reporting and data system,breast imaging atlas.Reston,Va:American College of Radiology,2003:1-336.
  • 7Geller BM,Barlow WE,Ballard-Barbash R,et al.Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS to report on the mammographic evaluation of women with signs and symptoms of breast disease.Radiology,2002,222:536642.
  • 8Frisell J,Eklund G,Hellstrom L,et al.Analysis of interval breast carcinomas in a randomized screening trial in Stockholm.Breast Cancer Res Treat,1987,9:219-225.
  • 9Lewin JM,Dorsi CJ,Hendrick ER,et al.Clinical comparison of fullfield digital mammngraphy and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer.AJR Am J Roentgenol,2002,179:671-677.
  • 10Skaane P,Hofvind S,Skjennald A.Randomized trial of screenfilm versus full-field digital manunography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program:follow-up and final results of Oslo Ⅱ study.Radiology,2007,244:708-717.

二级参考文献25

  • 1赵卫红,徐兵河,李青,张频,孙燕.70岁以上老年女性乳腺癌患者的特点和预后分析[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2006,28(5):385-388. 被引量:70
  • 2Muss HB. Adjuvant treatment of elderly breast cancer patients. Breast, 2003. 12:550-557.
  • 3Bobo JK, Lawson HW, Lee NC, et al. Risk factors for failure to detect a cancer during clinical breast examinations (United States). Cancer Causes Control, 2003, 14:461-468.
  • 4Wyld L, Garg DK, Kumar, et al. Stage and treatment variation with age in postmenopausal women with breast cancer:compliance with guidelines. Br J Cancer, 2004, 90:1486-1491.
  • 5DeMichele A, Putt M, Zhang Y, et al. Older age predicts a decline in adjuvant chemotherapy recommendations for patients with breast carcinoma:evidence from a tertiary care cohort of chemotherapyeligible patients. Cancer, 2003, 97:2150-2159.
  • 6Fentiman IS,Christiaens MR, Paridaens R, et al. Treatment of operable breast cancer in the elderly:a mndomised clinical trial EORTC 10851 comparing tamoxifen alone with modified radical mastectomy. Eur J Cancer, 2003, 39:309-316.
  • 7Fisher B, Aderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-yea.r follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpeetomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med, 2002, 347:1233-1241.
  • 8Arriagada R, Le MG, Conesso G, et al. Predictive factors for local recurrence in 2006 patients with surgically resected small breast cancer. Ann Oncol, 2002, 13:1404-1413.
  • 9Leong C, Boyages J, Jayasinghe UW, et al. Effect of margins on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast conservation therapy for lymph node-negative breast carcinoma. Cancer, 2004, 100: 1823-1832.
  • 10International Breast Cancer Study Group. Randomaized trial comparing axillary clearance versus no axillary clearance in patients with breast cancer: first results of International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial 10-93. J Clin Oncol, 2005, 24:337-344.

共引文献74

同被引文献91

引证文献9

二级引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部