转向以实用性为导向的基础性研究——2000年以来教育研究国际发展趋势分析被引量：4

Towards the Application-Oriented Basic Research:Latest Trends in International Educational Research since 2000

下载PDF

导出

摘要教育总与知识密切相连,但与教育自身相关的知识却并很难通过直接应用于实践来提高教育系统的效益和效果,这是持续困扰国际教育研究界的重大问题。一个国家的教育研究与发展系统可被看作是一种教育类知识管理体系,是国家创新体系的重要构成。改革教育知识管理体系的理念和运行模式同样是提高教育质量的一项重要措施。本文梳理和分析了2000年以来国际教育研究界对教育研发体系的新认识和新举措,即转向以实用性为主导的基础性教育研究,希望能对我国教育研究领域的改革和发展提供参考。 Education is always closely related to knowledge, but it has long been difficult to directly apply knowledge on education itself to enhance efficiency and effectiveness of educational practice. A national educational research and development system can be regarded as a management system of educational knowledge and serves as an important part of national innovation system. It is also an important measure for education quality improvement to innovate and reform the concept and operation mechanism of educational knowledge management system. By reviewing new ideas and policies in educational research and development in the international academic community since 2000, the paper maintains that the main focus has been shifted towards the application-oriented basic research. The study is intended to serve as a reference for the reform and development of educational research in China.

作者钟周史静寰赵琳

机构地区清华大学教育研究院

出处《复旦教育论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第6期15-18,41,共5页 Fudan Education Forum

关键词教育研究实证研究知识管理 Educational research Empirical research Knowledge management

分类号 G40-03 [文化科学—教育学原理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献23

1OECD. Education Research and Development - Trends Issues and Challenges [R]. Paris: OECD, 1995.
2OECD. New Challenges for Educational Research [R]. Paris: OECD, 2003.
3OECD. Evidence in Education Linking Research and Policy [R]. Paris: OECD, 2007.
4McMillan Jim, Schumacher Sally. Research in Education: Evidence Based Inquiry [M]. New York: Allyn & Bacon, 2005.
5Michael W. Apple, Michael. The Rhetoric and Reality of Standards-Based School Reform [J]. Educational Policy, 2001(15).
6HEFCE. Sir Gareth Roberts's Review of Research Assessment [R]. HEFCE, May 2003.
7Schmidt WH (ed). Facing the Consequences: Using TIMSS for a Closer Look at United States Mathematics and Science Education [M]. Dordrecht: Springer, 1999.
8Schmidt WH (ed). Why Schools Matter: A Cross-National Comparison of Curriculum and Learning [M]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2001.
9Lemke Met al. Characteristics of U.S. 15-Year-Old Low Achievers in an International Context: Findings from PISA 2000[R]. US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, 2005.
10Provasnik S et al. U.S. Performance Across International Assessments of Student Achievement: Special Supplement to The Condition of Education 2009 [R]. American Institutes for Research, 2009.