期刊文献+

文拉法辛与西酞普兰治疗躯体形式疼痛障碍对照研究

A control study of venlafaxine vs citalopram in the treatment of somatoform pain
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨文拉法辛与西酞普兰治疗躯体形式疼痛障碍的临床疗效及安全性。方法将63例躯体形式疼痛障碍患者随机分为研究组32例,对照组31例,研究组口服文拉法辛治疗,对照组口服西酞普兰治疗,观察6w。于治疗前及治疗2w、4w、6w末采用疼痛量表评定疼痛状况,汉密顿抑郁量表评定抑郁状况,副反应量表评定不良反应。结果治疗6w末,研究组疼痛缓解率为71.88%,抑郁情绪改善率93.75%;对照组分别为67.74%、90.32%,两组无显著性差异(P〉0.05)。研究组治疗2W末起疼痛量表疼痛严重程度因子分较治疗前显著降低(P〈0.01),对照组治疗4w末较治疗前显著下降(P〈0.01)。对照组治疗2w末起汉密顿抑郁量表认知障碍因子分较治疗前显著下降(P〈0.01),研究组治疗4w末较治疗前显著降低(P〈0.01)。结论文拉法辛与西酞普兰治疗躯体形式疼痛障碍、改善抑郁情绪总体疗效相当,但文拉法辛在缓解疼痛严重程度方面起效较快,而西酞普兰在改善认知障碍方面起效较快。 Objective To explore the clinical efficacy and safety of venlafaxine vs citalopram in the treatment of persistent somatoform pain disorder. Methods 63 patients with somatoform pain disorder were randomly divided into research group(n=32) took orally venlafaxine and control group(n=31) did citalopram for 6 weeks. Before treatment and atthe end of the 2nd,4th and 6th week, pain conditons were assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study Pain Measurement (MOSPM), depression conditions with the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD), and adverse effects with the Treatment Emergent- Symptom Scale (TESS). Results At the end of the 6th week, pain relieving rate and improvement rate of depressed emotion were respectively 71.88% and 93.75% in the research and 67.74% and 90. 32% in the control group, which showed no significant differences(P〉0.05). Compared with pretreatment, scores of pain severity of the MOSPM lowered more significantly since the end of the 2nd week in the research(P〈0.01) and since the end of the 4th week in the control group(P〈0.01). Compared with pretreatment, scores of cognitive disorder of the HAMA lowered more significantly since the end of the 2nd week in the control(P^0.01) and since the end of the 4th week in the research group(P〈0.01). Conclusion Total efficacies of venlafaxine and citalopram are equivalent in treatment of somatoform pain disorder and improvement of depressed emotion,but the former takes effect faster in pain relieving and the latter in improvement of cognitive disorder.
出处 《临床心身疾病杂志》 CAS 2009年第6期485-487,共3页 Journal of Clinical Psychosomatic Diseases
关键词 躯体形式疼痛障碍 文拉法辛 西酞普兰 疼痛量表 汉密顿抑郁量表 Somatoform pain disorder venlafaxine citalopram MOSPM HAMD
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献10

  • 1魏海燕,曹威.万拉法新的临床应用[J].中国民康医学,2005,17(6):304-307. 被引量:3
  • 2赵宝昌 崔秀云.疼痛学[M].沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,2000.531-532.
  • 3伊茂森 李松芝.慢性疼痛与镇痛辅助药功能性和立体定向[J].神经外科杂志,1996,9:79-82.
  • 4中华医学会精神科分会.中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准,第3版(CCMD-3)[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001.75-78.
  • 5张明园.精神科评定量表[M].长沙:湖南科技出版社,1998.17-27.
  • 6Ashburn MA,Staats PS.Management of chronic pain.Lancet,1999,353:1865~1869.
  • 7Priskorn M,Larsen F,Segonzac A,et al.Pharmacokinetic interaction study of citalopram and cimetidine in healthy subjects.Eur J Clin Pharmacol,1997,52:241 ~242.
  • 8Aragona M,Bancheri L,Perinelli D,et al.Randomized double-blind comparison of serotonergic(Citalopram) versus noradrenergic (Reboxetine)reuptake inhibitors in outpatients with somatoform,DSM-Ⅳ-TR pain disorder.Eur J Pain.2005,9:33 ~38.
  • 9Campo JV,Perel J,Lucas A,et al.Citalopram treatment of pediatric recurrent abdominal pain and comorbid internalizing disorders:an exploratory study.J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry.2004,43:1234~ 1242.
  • 10中华医学会精神科分会.CCMD-3中国精神障碍分类与论断标准[S].济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001.

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部